Table of Contents

UNITED STATES

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

Washington, D.C. 20549
_______________________

SCHEDULE 14A INFORMATION

Proxy Statement Pursuant to Section 14(a) of the

Securities Exchange Act of 1934
(Amendment (Amendment No. )

_______________________

Filed by the Registrant     ☒

Filed by a Party other than the Registrant     ☐

Check the appropriate box:

Filed by the RegistrantFiled by a party other than the Registrant

CHECK THE APPROPRIATE BOX:
 Preliminary Proxy Statement
Confidential, for Use of the Commission Only (as permitted by Rule 14a-6(e)(2))
Definitive Proxy Statement
 
Definitive Proxy Statement
Additional Materials
Definitive Additional Materials
Soliciting Material Pursuant tounder §240.14a-12

ROYAL CARIBBEAN CRUISES LTD.
Royal Caribbean Cruises Ltd.

(Name of Registrant as Specified In Its Charter)

Payment
(Name of Person(s) Filing Fee (CheckProxy Statement, if other than the appropriate box):Registrant)

PAYMENT OF FILING FEE (CHECK ALL BOXES THAT APPLY):
 No fee required.
required
Fee paid previously with preliminary materials.
materials
Fee computed on table in exhibit required by Item 25(b) per Exchange Act Rules 14a-6(i)(1) and 0-11.0-11



Table of Contents


Table of Contents

 


Table of Contents

Notice of 2022 Annual Meeting
and Proxy Statement

Miami, Florida | June 2, 2022



Table of Contents

Who We Are

We are one of the leadinglargest and most successful cruise companies in the world. We operateworld operating through our three global cruise brands: Royal Caribbean International, Celebrity Cruises and Silversea Cruises, (collectively,and also through our “Global Brands”). We also own a 50% joint venture interest in TUI Cruises GmbH that operates the German brandspartner brands: TUI Cruises and Hapag-Lloyd Cruises, (collectively, our “Partner Brands”).in which we own a 50% stake. Together, our Global Brands and our Partner Brands operatebrands represent a combined total of 6164 ships in the cruise vacation industry with an aggregate capacity of approximately 140,855150,005 berths as of December 31, 2021.2022.





Table of Contents

Letter from the

Chief Executive Officer

WeThe future of our company is bright, and we are focused on elevating innovation, building onwell-positioned to achieve both our record of achievement,near-term goals and growing with purposesucceed for our people, our guests, our shareholders and the communities we serve. Together with our award-winning brands, we remain committed to delivering the best vacation experiences in a responsible way.long-term.

Jason T. Liberty


President and Chief Executive Officer

Dear Fellow Shareholders,fellow shareholders,

As I reflect on this past year, I am tremendously proudOn behalf of everything ourRoyal Caribbean Group’s nearly 100,000 employees and crew members, I want to express how pleased we are with the progress our company has made over the past year. While 2022 had its challenges, it was a transitional year full of many notable achievements, including returning our business to full operations and leadership teams have achieveddelivering memorable vacations to help6 million guests.

We finished the year on a high note, and we will continue to build on that momentum throughout 2023. The normalization of our operations provide the visibility needed for us return to service after 15 months of being shut down due to the COVID-19 pandemic. It was truly an amazing moment in June 2021 to welcome back our first guests in the U.S. and to resume deliveringannual guidance. Additionally, we have developed a strong foundation to achieve our goals on Trifecta, our purpose as an organization –three-year initiative designed to provide the best vacations in the world in a responsible way.

Our Leadership Transitions

In December, my colleague, mentor and friend, Richard Fain, announced he would step down from his role as Chief Executive Officer after 33 years. There is no doubt Richard’s legacy will live on for many years.drive record financial performance. I am incredibly humbledproud of everyone at Royal Caribbean Group for the work they do each day to execute on our mission and honoredfurther strengthen the foundation for our future growth.

Supporting our communities and people

Our environmental, social and governance (ESG) ambitions help inform our strategic and financial decisions on a daily basis, ensuring that we always act responsibly while achieving our long-term profitability goals. In the year ahead, we will:

continue to work toward our target of reducing carbon intensity by double-digits by 2025;
deliver on significant milestones in our decarbonization pathway, including introducing advanced technologies on our new ships, while also continuing investments in energy efficiency programs for our existing fleet to help reduce our emissions;
continue the full operational deployment of our supplier portal, expanding our capabilities to evaluate our supplier partnerships, meet our responsible sourcing targets and improve our ability to build an inclusive network of suppliers; and
continue to foster a supportive culture, committed to diversity, equity and inclusion as well as making the wellbeing of our people a top priority.

Our future

Looking to the rest of 2023 and beyond, we will remain focused on our strategic and operational journey – while never losing sight of our Trifecta goals. We’ll also be hard at work executing on our strategic pillars, which are deepening customer relationships, delivering the best hardware and destinations, and excelling in the core of our business. As we move forward, I want to also acknowledge our unwavering commitment to our people, guests, communities, travel partners and shareholders. Royal Caribbean Group wouldn’t be the company it is without the support of all our stakeholders.

The future of our company is bright, and we are well-positioned to achieve both our near-term goals and succeed for the long-term. I have no doubt that this next President and Chief Executive Officerchapter of the Royal Caribbean Group and to partner with Richard in his role as Chairman of our Board of Directors. Additionally, we welcomed Naftali Holtz to the role of Chief Financial Officer. Naftali is a strong leader and has beenwill be a great partner in strengthening our financial condition as we continue our recovery efforts.

Our Commitment to ESG

In addition to a healthy return to sailing, we are steadfast in our commitment to environmental, social and governance (ESG) practices and the destinations we visit and the communities we serve. And as always, we continue to drive toward innovation, continuous improvement and doing the best we can for all of our stakeholders through a variety of efforts and initiatives. For example, last October, we announced our most exciting destination yet – Destination Net Zero – which outlined our aim to achieve net zero emissions by 2050. This ambitious strategy to cut emissions, protect our oceans and ensure the viability of our destinations builds upon our environmental journey that began 30 years ago with our Save the Waves campaign. We also continue to make progress in other areas of our ESG strategy, specifically in diversity, equity and inclusion and governance.

Our Future

As we continue to navigate the pandemic, we are focused on our full return to service, with our goal to have all of our ships back at sea as soon as possible. We and our award-winning brands, Celebrity Cruises, Royal Caribbean International, Silversea Cruises, TUI Cruises and Hapag-Lloyd Cruises remain committed to delivering the very best vacation experiences.

I believe the coming months and years will be transformational for our company,one, and I am excited about our future. I know expectations are high for our long-term growth and success, as they should be. We arelook forward to all committed to exceeding those expectations every day, and I thank you for your continued support and dedication to Royal Caribbean Group.we will accomplish in the year ahead, together.

Sincerely,



Jason T. Liberty


President and Chief Executive Officer

20222023 Proxy – Letter from the Chief Executive Officer1


Table of Contents

20212022 Performance Highlights

Navigating the Pandemic and Recovering from the Crisis – Key 20212022 Successes

Successful
Return to
Full Operations
   100%     95%     +3.5%     6 M
of fleet in operation since June 2022

Significant ramp-up in load factors, from 57% in first quarter to 95% in the fourth quarter of 2022

Strong demand for our vacation experiences; 3.5% increase in revenue per passenger cruise day versus 2019

6 million vacations delivered during 2022 at high guest satisfaction scores
Enhancing
Platform for
Long-Term
Growth

≈1,000

 

Launched 3 new ships

Strong pipeline capacity of 10 new ships to be delivered in 2023-2026

Destinations visited

Advanced critical port and destination efforts for a diversified port portfolio

Continued investments in private destinations and our digital infrastructure to enhance our guest experience and commercial capabilitiesIn November 2022, the Company introduced the Trifecta program, a new three-year initiative designed to drive superior performance
Strong Liquidity
and Improving
Financial
Performance

> $2.9 B

Year-end liquidityDisciplined cost management and focus on profitability, abating inflationary cost increases of more than 25% since 2019Successfully refinanced $6.9 billion of debt to manage debt maturity profile

Generated approximately $500M of operating cash flow

ESG is Core to
our Business
Opened the first net zero cruise terminal in Galveston, TexasLaunched a new environmental protection initiative – “Blue Green Promise” – aimed at supporting resilient and sustainable ocean communitiesSet a short-term target for Destination Net Zero to reduce carbon intensity by double digits by 2025.

Introduced our “Propelled by People” campaign, a new platform to increase employee engagement.


Leading the
Industry in
2     
a Return to
Service
85% 1.3 M2023 Proxy – 2022 Performance Highlights
Brought back 37K+ employeesFleet capacity operational by 12/31 fastest return in the industryLowest out of service cash burn per berth versus our peers1.3 million guests served in 2021 with only 0.19% COVID-19 positivity rate due to highly effective health and safety protocols
Enhancing
Platform for
Long-Term Growth
350

Launched 2 new ships

Strong pipeline capacity with 12 new ships 2022- 2026

Destinations visited

Advanced critical port and destination efforts for a diversified port portfolio

Introduced frictionless digital commerce – enhancing guest experience and providing tools to increase revenueRecord guest satisfaction scores and strong onboard revenue drove total revenue per passenger cruise day in Q4 up 10% vs record 2019 levels
Journey Back
to Strong
Financial

Results
>$3 B
Year-end liquidityReduced cost of debt funding by over 500bps (vs. 2020)Successfully refinanced $2.3 billion of crisis debt on an unsecured basis at lower costBy 4th Quarter, total cash flows from ships in operation turned positive
ESG is Core to
our Business
7 
Developed a strategic ESG Framework, setting a foundation to guide our decision-making, including adding a new Chief ESG OfficerLaunched Destination Net Zero to chart a course toward achieving net zero cruise ship by 2035 and enterprise net zero by 20507 times recognized as a World’s Most Ethical Company by EthisphereNamed as 2021 Forbes Best Employer for Diversity in recognition of our DEI efforts

2
2022 Proxy – 2021 Performance Highlights


Table of Contents

Proxy Summary

We look forward to welcoming you to our 20222023 Annual Meeting of Shareholders. This important meeting provides the Board of Directors and management with an opportunity to receive collective feedback from you, our shareholders. We place significant value on your opinion, and we have strived to highlight in this summary key information for your consideration. We recommend, however, that you read the entire proxy statement carefully before voting.

   

PROPOSAL 1

Election of Directors

The board recommends a vote “FOR” each nominee.

Director Nominees

  Director Committee
Membership
Name and Primary OccupationAgeSince ACTCCNGCSESH
John F. Brock  IND 
Former Chairman & CEO, Coca-Cola European Partners
732014   
Richard D. Fain
Chairman, Former CEO Royal Caribbean Group
741981     
Stephen R. Howe, Jr.  IND 
Former U.S. Chairman & Managing Partner, Ernst & Young
602018   
William L. Kimsey  LEAD DIRECTOR 
Former CEO, Ernst & Young Global
792003   
Michael O. Leavitt  IND 
Co-Chairman, Health Management Associates and
Chairman, Leavitt Equity Partners
712022    
Jason T. Liberty
President and CEO, Royal Caribbean Group
462022     
Amy McPherson  IND 
Former President & Managing Director, Europe, Marriott
602020    
Maritza G. Montiel  IND 
Former Deputy CEO & Vice Chairman, Deloitte
702015    
Ann S. Moore  IND 
Former Chairman & CEO, Time
712012    
Eyal M. Ofer  IND 
Chairman, Ofer Global and Zodiac Group
711995   
William K. Reilly  IND 
Founding Partner, Aqua International Partners
821998    
Vagn O. Sørensen  IND 
Former President & CEO, Austrian Airlines Group
622011   
Donald Thompson  IND 
Former President & CEO, McDonald’s
592015   
Arne Alexander Wilhelmsen  IND 
Chairman, AWILHELMSEN AS
562003   
                                              
PROPOSAL 1

Election of Directors
The board recommends
a vote
“FOR”
each nominee.

Director Nominees

Committee
Membership

Name and Primary Occupation

Age

Director Since

AC

TCC

NGC

SESH

John F. Brock INDEPENDENT
Former Chairman & CEO, Coca-Cola European Partners
     

74

     

2014

     
Richard D. Fain
Chairman, Former CEO Royal Caribbean Group

75

1981

Stephen R. Howe, Jr. INDEPENDENT
Former U.S. Chairman & Managing Partner, Ernst & Young

61

2018

William L. Kimsey   LEAD DIRECTOR
Former CEO, Ernst & Young Global

80

2003

Michael O. Leavitt   INDEPENDENT
Co-Chairman, Health Management Associates
and Chairman, Leavitt Equity Partners

72

2022

Jason T. Liberty
President and CEO, Royal Caribbean Group

47

2021

Amy McPherson   INDEPENDENT
Former President & Managing Director, Europe, Marriott

61

2020

Maritza G. Montiel   INDEPENDENT
Former Deputy CEO & Vice Chairman, Deloitte

71

2015

Ann S. Moore INDEPENDENT
Former Chairman & CEO, Time

72

2012

Eyal M. Ofer INDEPENDENT
Chairman, Ofer Global and Zodiac Group

72

1995

Vagn O. Sørensen INDEPENDENT
Former President & CEO, Austrian Airlines Group

63

2011

Donald Thompson INDEPENDENT
Former President & CEO, McDonald’s

60

2015

Arne Alexander Wilhelmsen INDEPENDENT
Chairman, AWILHELMSEN AS

57

2003

Rebecca Yeung INDEPENDENT
Corporate Vice President at FedEx Corporation

51

2023

ACAudit CommitteeSESH

SESH

Safety, Environment, Sustainability and Health Committee

Chair

NGC

Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee

TCC

TCC

Talent and Compensation Committee

Member

Member


20222023 Proxy – Proxy Summary3


Table of Contents

Proxy Summary

Board Snapshot

Skills and Experience

Diversity

INDUSTRY

Independence

Tenure

Age


Skills and Experience

INDUSTRY

Experience in industries such as hospitality, travel, tourism and shipping results in a deep understanding of consumer expectations and business strategy

EXECUTIVELEADERSHIP

Valuable in understanding and managing a range of corporate governance, risk management, strategic planning, finance, operational and management and succession planning matters

REGULATEDBUSINESS

Familiarity with highly regulated industries can provide the Board with insight and understanding of effective strategies in managing the complex political and regulatory landscape in which we operate

 

GOVERNMENT /
PUBLIC POLICY

Helpful to oversee management’s interactions with governing authorities while achieving desired business objectives

SUSTAINABILITY /
ENVIRONMENTAL

Strengthens the Board’s oversight and assures that strategic business imperatives and long-term value creation are achieved within a sustainable, environmentally focused model

FINANCE /
ACCOUNTING

Valuable in contributing to and overseeing strong financial planning, reliable financial information, robust controls and financial reporting

 

GLOBALENTERPRISE

Experience with a global enterprise or with international markets aids the Board in understanding diverse business environments, economic conditions, and cultures associated with our global workforce and activities

TECHNOLOGY /
INNOVATION /

CYBERSECURITY

Helps management address emerging risks, innovation and competitiveness in the digital age and technology risks, including cybersecurity risks

CONSUMERBUSINESS

Valuable as the Company seeks to provide all cruising guests with memorable vacation experiences and superior customer service

RISKMANAGEMENT

Enables directors to effectively anticipate and oversee the most significant risks facing the Company


4
20222023 Proxy – Proxy Summary


Table of Contents

Proxy Summary

                                              

PROPOSAL 2



Advisory Vote to Approve the Compensation of Our Named Executive Officers


The board recommends
a vote
“FOR”
this proposal.

 

We place significant focus on the design of our executive compensation programs as we believe their effectiveness is crucial to our success as a company. We assess our programs regularly and strive to continuously make improvements as well as incorporate shareholder feedback.

Executive Compensation Program

Align the interests of our
executives with the interests
of our shareholders

     

Recruit, retain, and
motivate an
elite management team

Reward positive contributions
to both short-and long-term
corporate performance


PRINCIPLES

“Our fundamentalIMPLEMENTATION

Total direct compensation philosophy remains unchanged – we strivelevels should be sufficiently competitive to construct compensation arrangements for our executives that align their interests with those of our shareholders. The pandemic presented unique challenges forattract, motivate and retain the cruise industry in 2021, but we were able to maintain our pay-for-performance focus and effectively motivate management to achieve objectives critical to the Company’s return to financial health and profitability.”highest quality executives.

Vagn O. Sørensen,

Chairman,Our Talent and Compensation Committee seeks to establish target total direct compensation (salary, short-term incentive and long-term incentive) at appropriate levels relative to our Market Comparison Group, providing our executives the opportunity to be competitively rewarded for our financial and operational performance. Total direct compensation opportunity (i.e., maximum achievable compensation) should increase with position and responsibility.

Performance-based and “at-risk” incentive compensation should constitute a substantial portion of total compensation.

We seek to foster a pay-for-performance culture, with a significant portion of total direct compensation being performance-based and/ or “at risk.” Executives with greater responsibilities and the ability to directly impact our strategic and operational goals and long-term results should bear a greater proportion of the risk if these goals and results are not achieved. Therefore, the more senior the executive, the greater the percentage of total compensation in the form of performance-based and/or “at risk” compensation.

Long-term incentive compensation should align executives’ interests with our shareholders’ interests to further the creation of long-term shareholder value.

We focus on ensuring that executive compensation includes a high proportion of long-term performance-based equity compensation. Awards of equity-based compensation encourage executives to focus on our long-term growth and prospects and incentivize executives to manage our company from the perspective of owners with a meaningful stake and to encourage them to remain with us for long and productive careers. Our stock ownership guidelines further enhance the incentive to create long-term shareholder value. Equity-based compensation also subjects our executives to market risk, a risk also borne by our shareholders.


20222023 Proxy – Proxy Summary5


Table of Contents

Proxy Summary

Executive Compensation Program

Compensation Elements

We provide compensation to our executives consisting of three principal elements: base salary, performance-based annual incentive bonus and long-term equity awards. The objectives and key features of each pay element are described below.

Pay Elements

CEO

Other NEOs

Objective

Key Features

  Pay Elements     
          CEOOther NEOsObjectiveKey Features
Provide a base level of steady income in line with expertise, experience, tenure, performance, potential and scope of responsibility

Set annually based on market competitiveness and in linein-line with performance and contributions to the achievement of Company goals

No increases for 2021

Increases, when appropriate, are provided based on market movements, scope of responsibilities, and merit

To focus executives on annual financial and operational performance

To reward executives for performance relative to our short-term goals and initiatives

Target bonus for each NEO is set early in the year and actual value realized will adjustEarned based on Company, brandcompany-wide and, if applicable, brand-specific financial and operational objective metrics and individual performance against previously established strategic goals, including, but not limited to, Adjusted EPS (corporate), adjusted brand operating income, if applicable, and an ESG composite
Payouts range from 0% and 200% based on achievement of results during the year
For our President and CEO, payout is entirely based on corporate performance. For other NEOs, one-third is determined based on individual performance and two-thirds is determined by corporate and, if applicable, brand performance
Structured to align with shareholder interests, reward the achievement of long-term goals and promote stability and corporate loyalty among the executives

Earned only if specified financial performance measures are met

Typically, with a three-year performance measure

2021 Actual payout rangesPSU Awards granted in 2022 for the period ended December 2024 will be earned based on Adjusted EPS, ROIC, leverage and an ESG composite
PSU Awards granted in 2022 for the period ended December 2024 can range from 0% to 200% of target award opportunity amount

● 2021 Awards based on ROIC, Adjusted EPS and leverage ratio performance

Multi-year vesting requirements align our executives’ interests with our shareholders and incentivize retention of our executive talent
Generally, vest in four equal annual installments, startingSet annually based on market competitiveness and in-line with performance and contributions to the first anniversaryachievement of the grant dateCompany goals
Increases, when appropriate, are provided based on market movements, scope of responsibilities, and merit.


6
20222023 Proxy – Proxy Summary


Table of Contents

Proxy Summary

                                              

PROPOSAL 3
Advisory Vote on Frequency of Shareholder Vote on Executive Compensation

The board recommends a vote for the option of “ONE YEAR.”
 
 

Applicable SEC rules require that, at least once every six years, shareholders be given the opportunity to vote on an advisory basis regarding the frequency (i.e., annually, every two years or every three years) of future shareholder advisory “say-on-pay” votes on the compensation of our named executive officers. Our shareholders voted on a similar proposal in 2017, with the majority voting to hold the say-on-pay vote annually. We continue to believe that say-on-pay votes should be conducted every year so that our shareholders may annually express their views on our executive compensation program.

PROPOSAL 4
Ratification of Principal Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm


The board recommends a vote “FOR”this proposal.

 
 
 

Aggregate fees for professional services rendered by PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP for the fiscal years ended December 31, 2022 and 2021 and 2020 were:

  2021  2020 
Audit fees $4,967,736      $5,718,226 
Audit-related fees $193,375  $190,265 
Tax fees $10,902  $14,616 
All other fees $10,000  $10,000 
Total $5,182,013  $5,933,107 
         
     2022     2021
Audit fees(1)$5,090,316$4,967,736
Audit-related fees(2)$212,889$193,375
Tax fees(3)$12,488$10,902
All other fees(4)$10,000$10,000
Total$5,325,693$5,182,013

(1)The audit fees for the fiscal years ended December 31, 2022 and 2021 were for professional services rendered for the integrated audits of the Company’s consolidated financial statements and system of internal control over financial reporting, quarterly reviews, statutory audits required by foreign jurisdictions, consents, issuance of comfort letters, and review of documents filed with the SEC.

PROPOSAL 4

Approval(2)

The audit-related fees for the fiscal years ended December 31, 2022 and 2021 were for the audits of Amendedthe Company’s retirement savings plan and Restated 2008 Equity Incentive Plan

The board recommends a vote “FOR” this proposal.

other attest services.
(3)Tax fees for the fiscal years ended December 31, 2022 and 2021 were for services performed in connection with international tax compliance, and transfer pricing.
(4)All other fees for the fiscal years ended December 31, 2022 and 2021 were for subscription fees for accounting and auditing research software.

We are asking shareholders to approve an amendment and restatement of our 2008 Equity Incentive Plan to, among other things, increase the number of shares of common stock reserved for issuance thereunder by 9.5 million shares. This amendment and restatement of the 2008 Plan (the “Amended Plan”) was recommended by our Talent and Compensation Committee. If approved by our shareholders, the Amended Plan will become effective as of the date of the Annual Meeting.


20222023 Proxy – Proxy Summary7


Table of Contents

Table of Contents

Letter from the Chief Executive Officer1
20212022 Performance Highlights2
Proxy Summary3
Notice of Annual Meeting of Shareholders9
Corporate Governance and Board Matters10
PROPOSAL 1 
Election of Directors10
Our Director Nominees10
Our Board’s Composition2120
Board Selection and Evaluation2322
Corporate Governance2725
Other Governance HighlightsBoard Committees3527
Other Governance Highlights33
Environmental, Social and Governance Overview3836
PROPOSAL 2
Advisory Vote to Approve the Compensation of Our Named Executive Officers4342
Executive Compensation4443
Compensation Discussion and Analysis4745
Executive Summary48
Report of the Talent and Compensation Committee6965
Executive Compensation Tables7066
CEO Pay Ratio75
Pay Versus Performance76
Director Compensation for 202120228180
Audit Committee MattersPROPOSAL 3
Advisory Vote on Frequency of Shareholder Vote on Executive Compensation82
PROPOSAL 3
4
Ratification of Principal Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm8283
Audit Fees8284
Report of the Audit Committee84
PROPOSAL 4
Approval of Amended and Restated 2008 Equity Incentive Plan
85
Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management9486
Principal Shareholders94
Security Ownership of Directors and Executive Officers9587
Equity Compensation Plan Information9688
General Information97
Annex A to Proxy StatementA-189

8
20222023 Proxy – Table of Contents


Table of Contents

Notice of Annual Meeting
of Shareholders

DATE & TIME


Thursday,

June 2, 2022
1, 2023
9:00 A.M., ET

LOCATION


JW Marriott Marquis

Miami, 255 Biscayne

Boulevard Way,

Miami, Florida 33131

RECORD DATE


Persons holding shares of our common stock as of the close of business on April 7, 20226, 2023 are entitled to notice of and to vote at the Annual Meeting or any adjournment thereof.

 

How to Vote

BY INTERNET

www.proxyvote.com

BY TELEPHONE
1-800-690-6903

1-800-690-6903

BY MAIL


Mark, sign and date
your proxy card and
return in the postage-

paidpostage-paid envelope we
have provided.

Items of Business   
1.Election of 14 directors to the Board 
Recommendation:  FOR Page Reference: 10 
2.Say-on-pay: advisory vote to approve the compensation of our named executive officers 
Recommendation:  FOR Page Reference: 4342 
3.Advisory vote on frequency of shareholder vote on executive compensation
Recommendation:  ONE YEAR Page Reference: 82
4.Ratification of the selection of PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP as our independent registered public accounting firm for 20222023 
Recommendation:  FOR Page Reference: 82
4.Approval of Amended and Restated 2008 Equity Incentive Plan
Recommendation:  FOR 83Page Reference: 85 

Shareholders also will transact such other business as may properly come before the Annual Meeting and any adjournment thereof.

We will furnish our proxy materials over the Internet as permitted by the rules of the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission. As a result, we are sending a Notice of Internet Availability of Proxy Materials rather than a full paper set of the proxy materials, unless you previously requested to receive printed copies. The Notice of Internet Availability of Proxy Materials contains instructions on how to access our proxy materials on the Internet, as well as instructions on how shareholders may obtain a paper copy of the proxy materials. This process will reduce the costs associated with printing and distributing our proxy materials.

Internet voting is available to make it easier for you to vote in advance of the Annual Meeting. The instructions on the Notice of Internet Availability of Proxy Materials or your proxy card describe how to use these convenient services.

All shareholders are cordially invited to attend the Annual Meeting in person. Whether or not you expect to attend, you are urged to vote as soon as possible by Internet or mail so that your shares may be voted in accordance with your wishes. Granting a proxy does not affect your right to revoke it later or to vote your shares in the event you attend the Annual Meeting.

 


R. Alexander Lake


Senior Vice President, Chief Legal Officer and Secretary

Royal Caribbean Cruises Ltd.
April 18, 2023

April 19, 2022

IMPORTANT NOTICE REGARDING THE AVAILABILITY OF PROXY MATERIALS FOR
THE SHAREHOLDER MEETING TO BE HELD ON JUNE 2, 2022
1, 2023

On or about April 19, 2022,18, 2023, we mailed a Notice of Internet Availability of Proxy
Materials containing instructions on how to access our proxy statement and 2021 2022
annual report. These materials are available online at proxyvote.com.



20222023 Proxy – Notice of Annual Meeting of Shareholders9


Table of Contents

Corporate Governance and
Board Matters

                                              

PROPOSAL 1

Election of Directors


The board recommends a vote “FOR” this proposal.

 
 

Our Board currently has 14 members, each of whom is standing for re-election to hold office until the next Annual Meeting of Shareholders and until their successors are duly elected and qualified. Each candidate has consented to being named in this proxy statement and serving as a director, if elected. However, if any nominee is not able to serve, the Board can either nominate a different person or reduce the size of the Board. If the Board nominates another individual, the persons named as proxies may vote for that nominee.

The Board unanimously recommends that shareholders vote “FOR” the election of each of the nominees for director named below.

Our Director Nominees

Our Board is made up of a diverse group of leaders with substantial experience in their respective fields. Our director nominees hold and have held senior positions as leaders of various large and complex businesses and organizations and in government, demonstrating their ability to develop and execute significant policy and operational objectives at the highest levels. Our nominees include current and former chief executive officers, chief financial officers, chief operating officers and other members of senior management of large, global businesses. Through these roles, our nominees have developed expertise in, among other things, core business strategy, operations, finance, human capital management and leadership development, compliance, controls and risk management, as well as the skills to respond to rapidly evolving business environments and to foster innovation and business transformation. Additionally, our nominees’ experience serving in government and on other boards brings valuable knowledge and expertise, including in the areas of public policy, governance, succession planning, financial reporting and regulatory compliance. Our Board believes that the combination of the various skills, qualifications and experiences of the director nominees contributes to an effective and well-functioning Board and that, individually and as a whole, the director nominees possess the necessary qualifications to provide effective oversight and strategic guidance.

10
20222023 Proxy – Corporate Governance and Board Matters


Table of Contents

Corporate Governance and Board Matters

We have included below detailed biographical information for each director nominee, including career highlights, other public directorships and select professional and community contributions, along with the top qualifications, experience, skills and expertise we believe each director brings to our Board. Our Board considered all of these attributes when deciding to nominate these individuals to the Board.

Age: 73

Director Since:

February 2014

Committees:

Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee; Talent and Compensation Committee

Other Public Company Boards:

None

 
 
John F. Brock

 
 
BACKGROUND:


Mr. Brock retired as Chief Executive Officer of Coca Cola European Partners in December 2016, having served in that role since the formation of that company in May 2016. Prior to that, Mr. Brock served as Chairman and Chief Executive Officer of Coca Cola Enterprises Inc. since April 2008 and as Chief Executive Officer since April 2006. From February 2003 until December 2005, Mr. Brock was Chief Executive Officer of InBev, S.A., a global brewer, and from March 1999 until December 2002, he was Chief Operating Officer of Cadbury Schweppes plc, an international beverage and confectionery company. From April 2007 to December 2007, Mr. Brock served as a director of Dow Jones & Company, Inc., a publisher and provider of global business and financial news. From 2004 to 2006, he served as a director of the Campbell Soup Company, a global manufacturer and marketer of branded convenience food products. From 2003 to 2005, he served as a director of Interbrew / Inbrew, a beer brewing company. He also served as a director of Reed Elsevier, a publisher, from 1997 to 2003. Mr. Brock is a Trustee of the Georgia Tech Foundation, Director of Horizons Atlanta, a philanthropic organization that enhances education for underserved children, and a member of the Smithsonian National Board. Mr. Brock also is a member of the Advisory Board of BIP Capital, a venture capital firm.

SPECIFIC QUALIFICATIONS, ATTRIBUTES, SKILLS AND EXPERIENCE:


Mr. Brock brings senior leadership and strategic and global expertise from his most recent position as Chairman and Chief Executive Officer of one of the world’s largest independent Coca-Cola bottlers. Prior to his retirement, Mr. Brock demonstrated effective and efficient leadership of a complex, publicly traded company competing in the highly competitive international beverage industry.

Age: 74

Director Since:
February 2014

Committees:
Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee; Talent and Compensation Committee

Other Public Company Boards:
None


20222023 Proxy – Corporate Governance and Board Matters11


Table of Contents

Corporate Governance and Board Matters

Chairman of the Board

Age: 74

Director Since:

January 1981

Committees:

None

Other Public Company Boards:

None

 
 
Richard D. Fain

 
 
BACKGROUND:


Mr. Fain has served as our Chief Executive Officer from 1988 through January 2022. He has been a director of the Company since 1981 and served as our Chairman and Chief Executive Officer from 1988 to 2021.since 1988. Mr. Fain is a recognized industry leader, having participated in shipping for over 4045 years and having held a number of prominent industry positions, such as Chairman of the Cruise Lines International Association (CLIA), the largest cruise industry trade association. He currently serves on the University of Miami Board of Trustees and the UhealthUHealth Board of Directors. He is former chairman of the University of Miami Board of Trustees, the Miami Business Forum, the Greater Miami Convention and Visitors Bureau, the UHealth Board of Directors, and the United Way of Miami Dade.

SPECIFIC QUALIFICATIONS, ATTRIBUTES, SKILLS AND EXPERIENCE:


Mr. Fain’s breadth of experiences, tenure and leadership provide incomparable insights into the history, operations, and strategic vision of the Company as well as the evolution and direction of the cruise industry as a whole. Having served as Chairman & CEO for over 33 years, Mr. Fain helped grow the Company from a one brand Caribbean centric operation with berthing capacity of approximately 5,000 to the second largest cruise company in the world with a portfolio of global and regional brands that operate around the globe with berthing capacity of approximately 140,000.

Chairman of the Board

Age: 75

Director Since:
January 1981

Committees:
None

Other Public Company Boards:
None

                            

Age: 60

Director Since:

December 2018

Committees:

Audit Committee; Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee (Chairman)

Other Public Company Boards:

None

 
 
Stephen R. Howe, Jr.

 
 
BACKGROUND:


Mr. Howe served as U.S. Chairman and Managing Partner and Americas Area Managing Partner of Ernst & Young (“EY”) and was a member of EY’s Global Executive Board from 2006 until his retirement in 2018. In these roles, Mr. Howe directed strategy and operations for EY’s businesses of over 75,000 people, delivering professional services across all industry sectors. While leading EY, Mr. Howe also gained extensive board governance and regulatory experience and was executive sponsor for the firm’s focus on diversity and inclusiveness. He was with EY for over 35 years. Mr. Howe is also a member of the Board of Trustees of Carnegie Hall, the Board of the Peterson Institute for International Economics and the Board of Trustees (Chairman) of the Liberty Science Center. Mr. Howe was previously a member of the boards of Colgate University, the Center for Audit Quality and the Financial Accounting Foundation.

SPECIFIC QUALIFICATIONS, ATTRIBUTES, SKILLS AND EXPERIENCE:


Mr. Howe brings to the Board considerable financial and leadership experience through his service as U.S. Chairman and Managing Partner and Americas Managing Partner of EY. He provides the board with meaningful insight gained from his strategic and operational experience and from his past service as the executive sponsor of EY’s focus on diversity and inclusiveness.

Age: 61

Director Since:
December 2018

Committees:
Audit Committee; Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee (Chair)

Other Public Company Boards:
None


12
20222023 Proxy – Corporate Governance and Board Matters


Table of Contents

Corporate Governance and Board Matters

Lead Director

Age: 79

Director Since:

April 2003

Committees:

Audit Committee (Chairman); Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee

Other Public Company Boards:

None

 
 
William L. Kimsey

 
 
BACKGROUND:


Mr. Kimsey was employed for 32 years through September 2002 with the independent public accounting firm Ernst & Young L.L.P. From 1998 through 2002, Mr. Kimsey served as the Chief Executive Officer of Ernst & Young Global and Global Executive Board member of Ernst & Young and from 1993 through 1998 as the Firm Deputy Chairman and Chief Operating Officer. From 2003 until 2018, Mr. Kimsey served on the board, the compensation committee, and the audit committee (serving as chair from 2011-2018) of Accenture Plc. From 2004 until 2008, he served on the board of NAVTEQ Corporation and was the chairman of its audit committee. From 2003 through 2014, Mr. Kimsey also served on the board and the audit committee of Western Digital Corporation. Mr. Kimsey is a certified public accountant and a member of the American Institute of Certified Public Accountants.

SPECIFIC QUALIFICATIONS, ATTRIBUTES, SKILLS AND EXPERIENCE:


As former Chief Executive Officer of one of the largest public accounting firms in the world, Mr. Kimsey brings substantial accounting and finance knowledge and expertise to the Board as well as experience serving on and chairing the audit committees of a number of other large, well regarded public corporations.

Lead Director

Age: 80

Director Since:
April 2003

Committees:
Audit Committee (Chair); Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee

Other Public Company Boards:
None

                            

Age: 71

Director Since:

February 2022

Committees:

Safety, Environment, Sustainability and Health Committee

Other Public Company Boards:

American Express (New York Stock Exchange)

 
 
 
Michael O. Leavitt

      
 
 
BACKGROUND:


Gov. Leavitt is the Co-Chairman of Health Management Associates, a health care consulting firm, and Chairman of Leavitt Equity Partners, a private equity fund. From 2009 to 2021, he served as the Chairman of Leavitt Partners, LLC, a health care consulting firm. He also previously served as the United States Secretary of Health and Human Services from 2005 to 2009, the Administrator of the Environmental Protection Agency from 2003 to 2009 and the Governor of the State of Utah from 1993 to 2003.

SPECIFIC QUALIFICATIONS, ATTRIBUTES, SKILLS AND EXPERIENCE:


Gov. Leavitt brings to our Board extensive management and leadership experience, including service as the Governor of Utah, a large state with a diverse body of constituents, and service in positions with the U.S. government, where he oversaw and advised on issues of national concern such as healthcare and environmental protection. These experiences were instrumental to his role as Co-Chair of the Healthy Sail Panel in developing recommendations for cruise lines to advance their public health response to COVID-19 and contributes to the Board’s oversight of these issues. Further, his experience at the EPA provides the Board with valuable insight in relation to the Company’s various environmental, social and governance initiatives.

Age: 72

Director Since:
February 2022

Committees:
Safety, Environment, Sustainability and Health Committee (Chair)

Other Public Company Boards:
American Express (New York Stock Exchange)


20222023 Proxy – Corporate Governance and Board Matters13


Table of Contents

Corporate Governance and Board Matters

Age: 46

Director Since:

January 2022

Committees:

None

Other Public Company Boards:

WNS (Holdings) Ltd. (New York Stock Exchange)

 
 

Jason T. Liberty

 
 
BACKGROUND:


Mr. Liberty has served as President and Chief Executive Officer since January 2022. Mr. Liberty has held several roles since joining the Company in 2005, including most recently as Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer since 2017 and, prior to that, as Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer since 2013. Before his role as Chief Financial Officer, Mr. Liberty served as Senior Vice President, Strategy and Finance from 2012 through 2013; as Vice President of Corporate and Revenue Planning from 2010 through 2012; and as Vice President of Corporate and Strategic Planning from 2008 to 2010. Before joining Royal Caribbean Group, Mr. Liberty was a Senior Manager at the international public accounting firm of KPMG LLP.

SPECIFIC QUALIFICATIONS, ATTRIBUTES, SKILLS AND EXPERIENCE:


Mr. Liberty has years of broad-based, diverse senior management experience at the Company, including service as Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer, where he was responsible for finance, strategy, shared service operations, legal, and technology matters, among other areas. His experience and industry knowledge make him a valuable member of our Board.

Age: 47

Director Since:
January 2022

Committees:
None

Other Public Company Boards:
WNS (Holdings) Ltd. (New York Stock Exchange)

                            

 
 
Age:  
Amy McPherson
60

Director Since:

December 2020

Committees:

Talent and Compensation Committee

Other Public Company Boards:

PVH Corporation (New York Stock Exchange)

      Amy McPherson

 
 
BACKGROUND:


Ms. McPherson served in various positions at Marriott International, Inc. for over 30 years. Most recently, from 2009 through 2019, she served as President & Managing Director, Europe. Under her leadership, Marriott launched five new brands in Europe and completed the successful integration of Starwood Hotels in Europe. Since 2017, Ms. McPherson has served as a non-executive member of the board of directors of PVH Corporation and is a member of its Audit and Nominating & Governance Committees.

SPECIFIC QUALIFICATIONS, ATTRIBUTES, SKILLS AND EXPERIENCE:


Ms. McPherson brings to the board considerable experience in overseeing business operations and development in Europe, having overseen multiple brands of hotels for Marriott. She has overseen acquisitions and strategic partnerships and implemented and executed strategies on both a regional and global basis. In addition, Ms. McPherson has experience managing Marriott’s global and field sales, marketing, loyalty program, revenue management, e-commerce, worldwide reservation sales and customer care, and sales channel strategy and analysis.

Age: 61

Director Since:
December 2020

Committees:
Talent and Compensation Committee

Other Public Company Boards:
PVH Corporation (New York Stock Exchange)


14
20222023 Proxy – Corporate Governance and Board Matters


Table of Contents

Corporate Governance and Board Matters

Age: 70

Director Since:

December 2015

Committees:

Audit Committee

Other Public Company Boards:

AptarGroup, Inc. (New York Stock Exchange); Comcast Corporation (Nasdaq Global Select Market); McCormick & Company (New York Stock Exchange)

 
 
Maritza G. Montiel

 
 
BACKGROUND:


Ms. Montiel served as Deputy Chief Executive Officer and Vice Chairman of Deloitte LLP from 2011 through her retirement in May 2014. Prior to these positions, she held numerous senior management roles at Deloitte, including Managing Partner (Leadership Development and Succession, Deloitte University) from 2009 to 2011, and Regional Managing Partner from 2001 to 2009. During Ms. Montiel’s tenure at Deloitte, she was the Advisory Partner for many public company registrants in which Deloitte was the principal auditor.addition to overseeing Deloitte’s risk function. Ms. Montiel is a board member of AptarGroup, Inc. where she chairs the audit committee, a board member of Comcast Corporation, where she is a member of the audit committee, and a board member of McCormick & Company, where she chairs the audit committee.

The Board has concluded that Ms. Montiel’s simultaneous service on four public company audit committees would not impair her ability to serve on the Audit Committee.

SPECIFIC QUALIFICATIONS, ATTRIBUTES, SKILLS AND EXPERIENCE:


Leveraging her more than 35 years of advising companies (including providing attestation services for public companies) across a wide cross section of industries, Ms. Montiel brings to the Board significant financial and advisory experience. The Board also benefits from her deep and broad working knowledge of the strategic and governance challenges faced by today’s large organizations and her experience overseeing risk and compliance in her role as Deputy CEO of Deloitte.

Age: 71

Director Since:
December 2015

Committees:
Audit Committee

Other Public Company Boards:
AptarGroup, Inc. (New York Stock Exchange); Comcast Corporation (Nasdaq Global Select Market); McCormick & Company (New York Stock Exchange)

                            

Age: 71

Director Since:

May 2012

Committees:

Talent2023 Proxy – Corporate Governance and Compensation CommitteeBoard Matters

     15


Table of Contents

Corporate Governance and Board Matters

Other Public Company Boards:

None

 
 
Ann S. Moore

 
 
BACKGROUND:


Ms. Moore served as ChairmanChair and Chief Executive Officer of Time Inc. from July 2002 to September 2010 and served as ChairmanChair through December 2010. Prior to that, Ms. Moore was Executive Vice President of Time Inc., where she had executive responsibilities for a portfolio of magazines including Time, People, InStyle, Teen People, People en Español and Real Simple. Ms. Moore joined Time Inc. in 1978 in Corporate Finance. Since then, she held consumer marketing positions at Sports Illustrated, Fortune, Money and Discover, moving to general management of Sports Illustrated in 1983 and to publisher of People in 1991. From 1993 to May 2014, Ms. Moore served on the Board of Directors of Avon Products Inc. She was also a director of the Wallace Foundation from 2004 through June 2016.

SPECIFIC QUALIFICATIONS, ATTRIBUTES, SKILLS AND EXPERIENCE:


Ms. Moore’s extensive experience in consumer driven publishing and media brings to the Board recognized management and entrepreneurial capabilities. As the leader of one of the largest magazine companies in the United States, Ms. Moore successfully expanded the footprint of many of the company’s flagship brands and oversaw her company’s transition to digital platforms.

 2022 Proxy – Corporate Governance and Board Matters15

Table of Contents

Corporate Governance and Board Matters

Age: 7172

Director Since:
May 2012

May 1995Committees:
Talent and Compensation Committee

Committees:

Safety, Environment, Sustainability and Health Committee; Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee

Other Public Company Boards:
None

None

 

 
 
Eyal M. Ofer

 
 
BACKGROUND:


Mr. Ofer ishas served as a global maritime shipping and real estate business leader and philanthropist. Asdirector of the Company since May 1995. He is Chairman of ahis multi-generational family group, Ofer Global, he leadsleading a private portfolio of international businesses principally focused on maritime shipping, real estate, energy, technology,tech, banking and large public investments. Its interests span Europe, North America, the Near East, Australasia and Southeast Asia. Mr. Ofer heads Ofer Global’s various divisions, includingThese include its shipping division, Zodiac Group, an international shipping enterprise operating a diversified fleet of over 180 vessels worldwide;worldwide, and its real estate arm, Global Holdings Group, a property holding conglomerate with over 10 million square feet of real estate, holding group specializing in large scale iconiclarge-scale office buildings, hotels and luxury residential developments, as well as other investment and development assets. He also leads the group’s O.G. Energy division, which has interests including renewable energy projects focused on wind, solar and forestry, and is a global leader in the provision of FSO and FPSO units through Omni Offshore Terminals. In 2017, Mr. Ofer launched O.G. Tech,Venture Partners, a founder-friendly multi-stage single LP Venture Capital fund focused on investing in early-growth-stage technology startups. Mr. OferHe also chairssits on the Eyal & Marilyn Ofer Family Foundation, a philanthropic foundation established foradvisory board of the charitable giving of his family in support of education and the arts.

Bloomberg New Economy Forum.

SPECIFIC QUALIFICATIONS, ATTRIBUTES, SKILLS AND EXPERIENCE:


Mr. Ofer brings to the Board over 30 years of significant leadership in the international maritime industry, including over 20 years of service on our Board of Directors. Mr. Ofer also provides considerable expertise in both real estate and finance matters, having played a leading role throughout his career in both expanding and diversifying his family’s shipping enterprise into sectors including real estate, cruise lines, hotels and banking.

Age: 72

Director Since:
May 1995

Committees:
Safety, Environment, Sustainability and Health Committee; Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee

Other Public Company Boards:
None


16
20222023 Proxy – Corporate Governance and Board Matters


Table of Contents

Corporate Governance and Board Matters

Age: 82

Director Since:

January 1998

Committees:

Safety, Environment, Sustainability and Health Committee (Chairman)

Other Public Company Boards:

None

 
 
William K. Reilly

BACKGROUND:

Mr. Reilly is the Founding Partner of Aqua International Partners L.P., a private equity fund established in 1997 and dedicated to investing in companies engaged in water-related businesses. From 1989 to 1993, Mr. Reilly served as the Administrator of the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. He has also previously served as the first Payne Visiting Professor at Stanford University, President of the World Wildlife Fund and President of The Conservation Foundation. He is Chairman Emeritus of the World Wildlife Fund and Chairman of the Advisory Committee to the Nicholas Institute for Environmental Policy Solutions at Duke University. He served from 2016 until 2021 as a director of Enviva Partners LP, a publicly traded master limited partnership that aggregates wood fiber and processes it into a transportable form. From 1993 until April 2012, Mr. Reilly served on the Board of Directors of E.I. duPont de Nemours and Company and from 1997 until May 2013, he served on the Board of Directors of ConocoPhillips. In May 2010, President Obama named Mr. Reilly to serve as co-chair of the National Commission on the BP Deepwater Horizon Oil Spill and Offshore Drilling, which released its report on January 11, 2011. In December 2012, the President named Mr. Reilly to the Council for Global Development. In 2017, Mr. Reilly became a director of the Center for Strategic and International Studies, a non-profit research and communication organization in Washington, DC. In 2018, Mr. Reilly became a director of the Union of Concerned Scientists, a non-profit research and communications organization based in Cambridge, MA.

SPECIFIC QUALIFICATIONS, ATTRIBUTES, SKILLS AND EXPERIENCE:

Mr. Reilly brings to the Board his wealth of environmental, safety and regulatory expertise gained through significant leadership roles within a number of distinguished environmental organizations, including the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency and the World Wildlife Fund, and on important environmental projects, including serving as co-chair of the National Commission on the BP Deepwater Horizon Oil Spill and Offshore Drilling.

2022 Proxy – Corporate Governance and Board Matters17

Table of Contents

Corporate Governance and Board Matters

Age: 62

Director Since:

July 2011

Committees:

Audit Committee; Talent and Compensation Committee (Chairman)

Other Public Company Boards:

Air Canada (Toronto Stock Exchange); FLSmidth A/S (Copenhagen Stock Exchange); CNH Industrial (New York Stock Exchange and Milan Stock Exchange)

Vagn O. Sørensen

 
 
BACKGROUND:


Mr. Sørensen brings to the Board over 20 years of experience in the aviation industry, having served as the President and Chief Executive Officer of Austrian Airlines Group from 2001 through 2006. Prior to that, he served in a variety of roles with Scandinavian Airlines Systems, including as Executive Vice President and Deputy CEO. He currently serves as a board member and chairman for a number of corporations throughout Europe and Canada, including Air Canada, FLSmidth A/S,Pantheon Infrastructure Trust, Parques Reunidos SA, CNH Industrial and Scandlines. Mr. Sørensen also previously served on the board of Scandic Hotels AB, SSP Group and DFDS.

SPECIFIC QUALIFICATIONS, ATTRIBUTES, SKILLS AND EXPERIENCE:


Mr. Sørensen’s breadth of experience in the aviation industry and the insurance industry brings useful insight to the Board, especially with respect to matters impacting the travel industry and risk management. He also provides significant experience within the shipping industry gained through his prior service as Deputy Chairman of DFDS A/S, one of the largest short seas operators in Europe. Through his service on a number of other boards in Europe and Canada, Mr. Sørensen also provides the Board with diverse perspectives.

Age: 63

Director Since:
July 2011

Committees:
Audit Committee; Talent and Compensation Committee (Chair)

Other Public Company Boards:
Air Canada (Toronto Stock Exchange); CNH Industrial (New York Stock Exchange and Milan Stock Exchange); Pantheon Infrastructure PLC (London Stock Exchange)


18
20222023 Proxy – Corporate Governance and Board Matters     17


Table of Contents

Corporate Governance and Board Matters

 
 
Age: Donald Thompson59

Director Since:

May 2015

Committees:

Safety, Environment, Sustainability and Health Committee; Talent and Compensation Committee

Other Public Company Boards:

Northern Trust Corporation (Nasdaq Global Select Market)

      Donald Thompson

 
 
BACKGROUND:


Mr. Thompson currently serves as Chief Executive Officer of Cleveland Avenue, LLC, a food, beverage and technology investment company, which he founded in 2015. From 2012 to March 2015, Mr. Thompson served as President and Chief Executive Officer of McDonald’s Corporation. Previously, Mr. Thompson served as President and Chief Operating Officer of McDonald’s Corporation from 2010 to 2012 and President of McDonald’s USA from 2006 to 2010. Prior to joining McDonald’s, Mr. Thompson served six years as an Electrical Engineer for the Northrop Corporation, where he specialized in power supply design and manufacturing for high technology radar systems. Mr. Thompson served as director of McDonald’s Corporation from 2011 to March 2015, a director of Exelon Corporation from 2007 to 2013 and a director of Beyond Meat, Inc. from 2015 to May 2021. He also served as an Advisory Board member of DocuSign, Inc. from 2015 to 2018.2018 and a Trustee of Purdue University from 2009 to 2022. Mr. Thompson has served as a director of Northern Trust Corporation since March 2015 and has been a member of the board of directors of Footprint International HoldCo Inc. since April 2021, and has served as chairman of the board since June 2021. He also serves on numerous civic and philanthropic boards. He is a member of the Commercial and Economic Clubs of Chicago, World Business Chicago and the Arthur M. Brazier Foundation. He serves as a director for Northwestern Memorial HealthCare and a Trustee on the boardsboard of the Cleveland Avenue Foundation for Education, Northwestern Memorial HealthCare and Purdue University.

Education.

SPECIFIC QUALIFICATIONS, ATTRIBUTES, SKILLS AND EXPERIENCE:


Mr. Thompson brings to the Board significant strategic leadership and collaboration skills as well as valuable global business perspective. His 25-year career at McDonald’s, the world’s leading global foodservice retailer, culminated in him leading the company from 2012 through 2015. In his role as President & CEO of McDonald’s, Mr. Thompson directed strategy and operations for over 30,000 restaurants in over 100 countries, working closely with thousands of independent owner/operators, corporate staff and restaurant employees around the world.

Age: 60

Director Since:
May 2015

Committees:
Safety, Environment, Sustainability and Health Committee; Talent and Compensation Committee

Other Public Company Boards:
Northern Trust Corporation (Nasdaq Global Select Market)


18     
20222023 Proxy – Corporate Governance and Board Matters
19


Table of Contents

Corporate Governance and Board Matters

Age: 56

Director Since:

April 2003

Committees:

Safety, Environment, Sustainability and Health Committee; Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee

Other Public Company Boards:

None

 
 
Arne Alexander Wilhelmsen

 
 
BACKGROUND:


Mr. Wilhelmsen is Chairman of the board of directors of AWILHELMSEN AS, the holding company for the AWILHELMSEN group of companies, after having served as the Chairman of the board of directors of AWILHELMSEN Management AS from 2008 through June 2013. He also founded, and has served since 2011 as Chairman of the Board of, AWECO AS, a family office with financial investments, significant philanthropy and social impact activities. Mr. Wilhelmsen was elected Chairman of the Board of AWILHELMSEN HOLDING AS in June 2016 and Aweco Cruise Holding AS in June 2017. He has held a variety of positions within the AWILHELMSEN group of companies since 1995. In addition, Mr. Wilhelmsen serves as Chairman of the board of his wholly-owned company, Pan Sirius AS. From 1996 through 1997, Mr. Wilhelmsen was engaged as a marketing analyst for the Company and from 2001 through 2009 served as a member of the board of directors of Royal Caribbean Cruise Line AS, a wholly-owned subsidiary of Royal Caribbean Cruises Ltd. that was responsible for sales and marketing activities in Europe.

SPECIFIC QUALIFICATIONS, ATTRIBUTES, SKILLS AND EXPERIENCE:


As the leader of an investment company with varied interests across a number of business segments, including shipping, cruise, real estate, retail, offshore oil services, and software development for health services, Mr. Wilhelmsen brings a diverse knowledge base and strategic insight to the Board. As the representative of the Company’s largest shareholder and one of the Company’s original founders, Mr. Wilhelmsen also provides a valuable historical perspective to the Board.

Age: 57

Director Since:
April 2003

Committees:
Safety, Environment, Sustainability and Health Committee; Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee

Other Public Company Boards:
None


20
 2022
 
Rebecca Yeung
 
 
BACKGROUND:
Ms. Yeung serves as Corporate Vice President, Operations Science and Advanced Technology at FedEx Corporation, a global logistics company with a broad portfolio of transportation, e-commerce and business services. In her role, she is responsible for driving critical aspects of FedEx’s innovation and transformation strategy including scaling up robotics and automation technology, autonomous vehicles, decision science, and electromobility. Ms. Yeung joined FedEx in 1998 and has served in various marketing, innovation, and technology roles since then. Prior her current role, she was Vice President – Advanced Technology & Innovation at FedEx Corporation from 2015 to 2021. She has also previously served as a Board of Director for the Mid-South Food Bank between 2013 and 2022.

SPECIFIC QUALIFICATIONS, ATTRIBUTES, SKILLS AND EXPERIENCE:
Ms. Yeung brings to the Board nearly 30 years of global experience in strategy, innovation, technology, global operations, logistics, digitization, and sustainability.

Age: 51

Director Since:
March 2023

Committees:
None

Other Public Company Boards:
Columbus McKinnon (NASDAQ)


2023 Proxy – Corporate Governance and Board Matters     19


Table of Contents

Corporate Governance and Board Matters

Our Board’s Composition

As illustrated by the director biographies above, our Board is made up of a diverse group of leaders with substantial experience in their respective fields. We believe that our directors should possess the highest personal and professional ethics, integrity and values, demonstrate the ability to act candidly, show a willingness and ability to evaluate, challenge and stimulate, have demonstrated leadership ability and a proven record of accomplishment as well as expertise in business, professional, academic, political or community affairs, and be committed to representing the long-term interests of the shareholders. Our Board believes that the combination of the various skills, qualifications and experiences of the director nominees contributes to an effective and well-functioning Board and that, individually and as a whole, the director nominees possess the necessary qualifications to provide effective oversight and insightful strategic guidance.

Board Snapshot

Diversity
   2022IndependenceTenureAge

20     2023 Proxy – Corporate Governance and Board Matters
21


Table of Contents

Corporate Governance and Board Matters

Skills and Experience

Our Board periodically reviews the appropriate skills and expertise required of the Board in order to successfully carry out its responsibilities both in the near term and into the future. This assessment includes issues of diversity (including diversity of race, gender and ethnicity), business experience and expertise – all in the context of an assessment of the perceived needs of the Board at that time and does not discriminate on the basis of ethnicity, sexual orientation, culture or nationality.

Skills and Experience
IndustryINDUSTRY
Executive
Leadership
EXECUTIVE
LEADERSHIP
Regulated
Business
REGULATED
BUSINESS
Government /
Public Policy
GOVERNMENT /
PUBLIC POLICY
Sustainability /
Environmental
SUSTAINABILITY /
ENVIRONMENTAL
Finance /
Accounting
FINANCE /
ACCOUNTING
Global
Enterprise
GLOBAL
ENTERPRISE
Technology /
Innovation /
Cybersecurity
TECHNOLOGY /
INNOVATION /
CYBERSECURITY
Consumer
Business
CONSUMER
BUSINESS
Risk
Management
RISK
MANAGEMENT

22
20222023 Proxy – Corporate Governance and Board Matters     21


Table of Contents

Corporate Governance and Board Matters

Board Selection and Evaluation

Process for Identifying and Adding New Directors

We believe that our directors should possess the highest personal and professional ethics, integrity and values, demonstrate the ability to act candidly, show a willingness and ability to evaluate, challenge and stimulate, have demonstrated leadership ability and a proven record of accomplishment as well as expertise in business, professional, academic, political or community affairs, and be committed to representing the long-term interests of our shareholders.

1Assessment of Potential
Candidates

The Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee assesses potential candidates based on their history of achievement, the breadth of their business experiences, whether they bring specific skills or expertise in areas that the committee has identified as desired and whether they possess personal attributes and experiences that will contribute to the sound functioning of our Board. In addition, the Board self-evaluation process described below is an important determinant for Board refreshment.

2
2Use of a Third-Party
Search Firm

The Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee typically uses a professional search firm to help identify, evaluate and conduct due diligence on potential director candidates. Using a professional search firm supports the committee in conducting a broad search and looking at a diverse pool of potential candidates. In 2022, this third-party search firm identified and recommended Ms. Yeung for appointment to the Board.

The Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee also maintains an ongoing list of potential candidates and considers recommendations made by members of the Board. The Board of Directors met with Michael Leavitt as part of his role as Co-Chair of the Healthy Sail Panel. At a meeting of

3Shareholder Nominations

In addition, the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee considers all shareholder recommendations for director candidates and applies the members discussedsame standards in considering candidates submitted by shareholders as it does in evaluating all other candidates. Shareholders can recommend candidates by writing to the committee in care of the Company’s Corporate Secretary, whose contact information is on page 35.

Shareholders who wish to submit nominees for election at an annual or special meeting of shareholders should follow the procedure described on page 91.

Considering Board Diversity

The Board recognizes the value of having someonediversity and endeavors to have a Board composed of individuals with varying backgrounds (including diversity of race, gender and ethnicity) and experience in health care management as well as environmental, socialbusiness and governancein other areas that may be relevant to the Company’s activities. Our Corporate Governance Principles provide that whenever the Board conducts a search for a new director, the Board will consider at least one woman and one underrepresented minority in the slate of potential candidates.

The Board is currently composed of fourteen directors with diverse skills and Gov. Leavitt was identified as a potential candidate in that context.professional backgrounds, which provide our Board with an effective mix of experiences and perspectives.
Ethnic/gender diversity

36%

5 out of 14 directors are gender/ethnically diverse


322     Shareholder
Nominations

In addition, the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee considers all shareholder recommendations for director candidates and applies the same standards in considering candidates submitted by shareholders as it does in evaluating all other candidates. Shareholders can recommend candidates by writing to the committee in care of the Company’s Corporate Secretary, whose contact information is on page 37.

Shareholders who wish to submit nominees for election at an annual or special meeting of shareholders should follow the procedure described on page 99.

20222023 Proxy – Corporate Governance and Board Matters
23


Table of Contents

Corporate Governance and Board Matters

Considering Board Diversity

The Board recognizes the value of diversity and endeavors to have a Board composed of individuals with varying backgrounds (including diversity of race, gender and ethnicity) and experience in business and in other areas that may be relevant to the Company’s activities. Our Corporate Governance Principles provide that whenever the Board conducts a search for a new director, the Board will consider at least one woman and one underrepresented minority in the slate of potential candidates.

The Board is currently composed of fourteen directors with diverse skills and professional backgrounds, which provide our Board with an effective mix of experiences and perspectives.

Director Onboarding

We maintain a comprehensive director onboarding program to familiarize all new directors with the Company’s business, including its plans, significant financial, accounting and risk management issues, policies and compliance processes, strategic priorities and members of senior management. While some in-person orientation activities were paused during the COVID-19 pandemic, our director onboarding program also has included site and ship tours. Each director’s onboarding is tailored to take into account the individual’s prior experience and background and to ensure the director becomes knowledgeable about the most important issues affecting the Company and its business.

24
2022 Proxy – Corporate Governance and Board Matters

Table of Contents

Corporate Governance and Board Matters

Our Board Evaluation Process

The Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee has oversight responsibility for the annual Board and committee evaluation process and uses feedback from the evaluation to identify director nominees.

Review of the
Process’ Format

The Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee periodically reviews the format of the Board and committee evaluation process to ensure that actionable feedback is solicited on the performance of the Board and the committees.

 The Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee periodically reviews the format of the Board and committee evaluation process to ensure that actionable feedback is solicited on the performance of the Board and the committees.
 
  

Discussions with
Directors utilizing
Utilizing Questionnaire

For the 2022 evaluation process, the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee decided to have the Chair of the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee hold one-on-one discussions with directors utilizing questionnaires. The questionnaires solicited commentary on various topics, including Board and committee composition and performance, meeting materials, access to management, among other matters. Directors were also invited to discuss the performance of other individual Directors.

 For the 2021 evaluation process, the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee decided to have the Chairman of the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee hold one-on-one discussions with directors utilizing questionnaires. The questionnaires solicited commentary on various topics, including Board and committee composition and performance, meeting materials, access to management, among other matters. Directors were also invited to discuss the performance of other individual Directors.
 
  

Use of Results
to Guide Board
Enhancement

The Chairman

The Chair of the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee aggregated the feedback received from individual discussions with directors and presented the findings to the Chair of each Committee as it relates to their respective committee. The data identified any themes or issues that had emerged and included suggestions for areas of improvement. The Chair of the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee also presented the aggregated feedback to the full Board. The Board used these results to review and assess the Board’s and each committee’s composition and required skill sets, responsibilities, structure, processes and effectiveness.

2023 Proxy – Corporate Governance Committee aggregated the feedback received from individual discussions with directors and presented the findings to the full Board. The data identified any themes or issues that had emerged and included suggestions for areas of improvement. The Board used these results to review and assess the Board’s and each committee’s composition and required skill sets, responsibilities, structure, processes and effectiveness.Matters     23


Table of Contents

Corporate Governance and Board Matters

Executive Succession Planning

Succession planning and execution is one of the Board’s most important responsibilities, and the success of the Company’s recent leadership transitions is a testament to the care and diligence that the Board has devoted to this key topic. For many years, the Board has focused attention on this area and has developed programs and procedures designed to address it. These plans became relevant and actionable when Richard Fain, the Company’s long-standing CEO, announced his intention to step down as CEO effective at the beginning of 2022. The resulting transition, which notably included Jason Liberty being promoted to CEO and Naftali Holtz being appointed as CFO, was carried out smoothly and orderly with the oversight of the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee and the Talent and Compensation Committee.

The Board’s succession planning activities are strategic, long-term and supported by the Board’s committees and external consultants. As a result of the Board’s thoughtful approach to executive succession planning, the Board was well-positioned to effectuate the recent leadership transition in the midst of a challenging period in our industry and macroeconomic instability. The Board was intensively involved in evaluating each of these executives prior to their promotions and had opportunities to observe each executive through presentations to the Board as well as through significant informal contact.

2022 Proxy – Corporate Governance and Board Matters25

Table of Contents

Corporate Governance and Board Matters

Succession planning and talent development are important at all levels within the Company. In accordance with our Corporate Governance Principles, our Talent and Compensation Committee has primary responsibility for reviewing our talent development programs and initiatives for senior executives and for periodically reviewing our programs and practices for overseeing the continuity of capable management.

Evaluation
of Potential
Successors

A key responsibility of the Talent and Compensation Committee is the identification and evaluation of potential successors for each business-critical position in the Company. This includes, our CEO, CFO, Brand Presidents and other positions that have been identified as integral to the delivery of our service. Regularly, the Talent and Compensation Committee, in consultation with the CEO and with the assistance of external consultants, as necessary, reviews the skills, experiences and attributes that the Committee believes are required and/or desirable for each position in light of the Company’s then current business strategy, prospects and challenges. For each candidate, the Committee evaluates strengths, contributions, candidate readiness, and areas for development.

 A key responsibility of the Talent and Compensation Committee is the identification and evaluation of potential successors for each business-critical position in the Company. This includes, our CEO, CFO, Brand Presidents and other positions that have been identified as integral to the delivery of our service. Regularly, the Talent and Compensation Committee, in consultation with the CEO and with the assistance of external consultants, as necessary, reviews the skills, experiences and attributes that the Committee believes are required and/or desirable for each position in light of the Company’s then current business strategy, prospects and challenges. For each candidate, the Committee evaluates strengths, contributions, candidate readiness, and areas for development.
 
  

Recommendations
from the CEO

The CEO makes available his recommendations and evaluations of potential successors, along with a review of any development plans recommended for such individuals.

 The CEO makes available his recommendations and evaluations of potential successors, along with a review of any development plans recommended for such individuals.
 
  

CEO
Succession
Planning

In the event of a CEO transition, the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee, in consultation with the CEO, provides oversight of the CEO transition process.

 The Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee, in consultation with the CEO, oversees CEO succession planning, including establishing and executing on succession plans to effectuate a smooth process for CEO transition.
 
  

Ongoing Review
by the Board

The Board routinely engages with the Company’s leadership team on matters of talent and culture, including around the development of the Company’s talent pipeline and advancing diversity and inclusion efforts across the enterprise.

The Board routinely engages with the Company’s leadership team on matters of talent and culture, including around the development of the Company’s talent pipeline and advancing diversity and inclusion efforts across the enterprise.

 
2624     
20222023 Proxy – Corporate Governance and Board Matters


Table of Contents

Corporate Governance and Board Matters

Corporate Governance

Board Leadership Structure

The Board is responsible for broad corporate policy and overall performance of the Company through oversight of management and stewardship of the Company. Consequently, the Board believes that the independent directors should have a strong defined leadership roles. The current leadership structure of the Board consists of:

NameTitle
Richard FainChairmanChair of the Board
William KimseyLead Director, ChairmanChair of Audit Committee
Vagn O. SørensenChairmanChair of Talent and Compensation Committee
Stephen R. Howe, Jr.ChairmanChair of Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee
William ReillyGov. Michael LeavittChairmanChair of Safety, Environment, Sustainability and Health Committee

Separation of ChairmanChair and CEO Position

The Board recognizes that the leadership structure and combination or separation of the CEO and ChairmanChair roles are driven by the needs of the Company. As a result, no static policy exists requiring the combination or separation of leadership roles. The Board regularly reviews Board leadership structure and in connection with Mr. Fain stepping down as our CEO and the appointment of Mr. Liberty as his successor, has concluded that separating the positions of ChairmanChair and CEO is appropriate at this point in time. While Mr. Fain stepped down as CEO effective January 3, 2022, we believe that the Board and the Company are best served by retaining on the Board his 30 years of experience leading our Company as ChairmanChair and CEO through challenging periods in our industry and macroeconomic instability.CEO. Consequently, the Board asked Mr. Fain to continue to serve as the ChairmanChair of our Board. We believe that we will benefit from the strong working relationships and professional trust that Mr. Fain and Mr. Liberty have developed with other members of the Board. Further, the Board believes that the significant leadership roles undertaken by Mr. Kimsey as well as the various independent directors who chair other committees of the Board strike an appropriate balance between effective Board leadership and independent oversight of management.

Lead Independent Director

Regardless of the specific board leadership structure, our Corporate Governance Principles provides for a strong defined leadership role for a lead independent director. Our current lead independent director is Mr. Kimsey who has served in that role since 2013. Mr. Kimsey has significant experience in corporate governance, senior management of a global business and public company board experience.

2022 Proxy – Corporate Governance and Board Matters27

Table of Contents

Corporate Governance and Board Matters

Lead Independent Director

Under our Corporate Governance Principles, the independent directors annually elect an independent director to serve as Lead Independent Director. While the Board has currently separated the positions of ChairmanChair and CEO, the Board believes that a lead independent director continues to bring balance to our Board management.

Key Responsibilities

Calls meetings of the independent directors.

Presides at all meetings of the Board at which the ChairmanChair is not present, including executive sessions of the independent directors.

Facilitates communication between the independent directors, our ChairmanChair and our CEO.

Provides independent Board leadership.

● Approves the agenda for all Board meetings and all Board materials.

 Communicates with shareholders and other key constituents, as appropriate

●  

Engages with our other independent directors to identify matters for discussion at executive sessions of independent directors and advises our ChairmanChair and our CEO of any decisions reached, and suggestions made at the executive sessions.


2023 Proxy – Corporate Governance and Board Matters     25


IndependenceTable of Contents

Corporate Governance and Board Matters

Independence

Under our corporate governance principles, at least two thirds of our directors are required to be independent within the meaning of the NYSE standards of independence for directors. Our Corporate Governance Principles contain guidelines established by the Board to assist it in determining director independence in accordance with these NYSE standards. The Board believes that directors who do not meet the NYSE independence standards also make valuable contributions to the Board and to the Company by reason of their experience and wisdom, and the Board expects that some minority of its Board will not meet the NYSE independence standards.

To be considered independent under the NYSE independence standards, the Board must determine that a director does not have any direct or indirect material relationship with the Company or any of its subsidiaries. The Board has established guidelines to assist it in determining director independence in accordance with those standards, which are available on the corporate governance section on our website at www.rclinvestor.com.

Each director must regularly disclose to the Board whether his or her relationships satisfy these independence tests. Based on these disclosures and other information available to it, the Board has determined that all of the directors are independent with the exception of Mr. Fain and Mr. Liberty due to their past and current service as CEO, respectively.

Meetings

The Board held 135 meetings during 2021.2022. In 2021,2022, each of our directors attended at least 75% of an aggregate of all meetings of the Board and of any committees on which and he or she served during the period the director was on the Board or committee. Our independent directors regularly meet in executive session without management directors present. The Lead Director presides at such meetings.

We do not have a formal policy regarding Board member attendance at the annual shareholders meeting. Two of our Board members were in attendance at our 20212022 shareholders meeting in person.

2826     
20222023 Proxy – Corporate Governance and Board Matters


Table of Contents

Corporate Governance and Board Matters

Board Committees

The Board has established four standing committees: the Audit Committee, the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee, the Safety, Environment, Sustainability and Health Committee, and the Talent and Compensation Committee. Each of the standing committees is composed solely of independent directors. Each standing committee has adopted a written charter, meets periodically throughout the year, reports its actions and recommendations to the Board, receives reports from senior management, annually evaluates its performance and has the authority to retain outside advisors in its discretion. The primary responsibilities of each committee are summarized in the charts below and set forth in more detail in each committee’s written charter, which can be found in the corporate governance section on our website at www.rclinvestor.com.

In addition to these committees, the Board, from time to time, authorizes additional Board committees to assist the Board in executing its responsibilities. Notably, the Board established the ad hoc Strategic and Financial Health Committee that existed from August 2020 to December 2021 to assist in the oversight of management’s responsibility to improve the Company’s financial health, which was adversely impacted by the effect of the COVID-19 pandemic.

Audit Committee

Members:

William L. Kimsey
(Chairman)

(Chair)
Stephen R. Howe, Jr.


Maritza G. Montiel


Vagn O. Sørensen

Meetings Held

During 2021:2022:

7

8

RESPONSIBILITIES:Responsibilities:

Oversight of

the integrity of our financial statements

the qualifications and independence of our principal independent auditor

the performance of our internal audit function and principal independent auditor

our compliance with the legal and regulatory requirements in connection with the foregoing

Review of and discussions with management and the principal independent auditor regarding the annual audited and quarterly financial statements of the Company and related disclosures

Discuss with management the guidelines and policies by which management assesses and manages the Company’s exposure to risk, including a discussion of the Company’s major enterprise risk exposures and the steps management has taken to monitor and mitigate such exposures

Discuss with management policies regarding the Company’s information system and data privacy controls, and cybersecurity
Review of the controls and procedures related to the Company’s environmental, social and governance disclosures

Preparation of Report of the Audit Committee (page 84)85)

Independence and Financial Expertise:

INDEPENDENCE AND FINANCIAL EXPERTISE:

The Board has determined that each member of the Audit Committee is independent within the meaning of the NYSE and SEC standards of independence for directors and audit committee members

The Board has concluded that Mr. Howe, Mr. Kimsey, Ms. Montiel and Mr. Sørensen each qualify as an “audit committee financial expert” within the meaning of SEC rules

The Board has concluded that Ms. Montiel’s simultaneous service on four public company audit committees would not impair her ability to serve on the Audit Committee


20222023 Proxy – Corporate Governance and Board Matters29     27


Table of Contents

Corporate Governance and Board Matters

Nominating

and Corporate

Governance

Committee

Members:

Stephen R. Howe, Jr.
(Chairman)

(Chair)
John F. Brock


William L. Kimsey


Eyal M. Ofer


Arne Alexander
Wilhelmsen

Meetings Held

During 2021:2022:

6

4

RESPONSIBILITIES:Responsibilities:

Identification of individuals qualified to become Board members

Recommendation to the Board of director nominees

Recommendation to the Board of Corporate Governance Principles

Recommendation to the Board of Board committee nominees

Recommendation to the Board of Board committee structure, operations and Board reporting

Oversee evaluation of Board and management performance

Oversee the CEO Succession Planningtransition process in the event of a CEO transition

Independence:

INDEPENDENCE:

The Board has determined that each member of the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee is independent within the meaning of the NYSE standards of independence for directors


Safety,

Environment,

Sustainability

and Health

Committee

Members:

William K. Reilly
(Chairman)
Eyal M. Ofer
Michael O. Leavitt

(Chair)
Eyal M. Ofer
Donald Thompson


Arne Alexander
Wilhelmsen

Meetings Held

During 2021:2022:

4

RESPONSIBILITIES:Responsibilities:

Oversight of our management concerning the implementation and monitoring of our safety (including security), environmental, sustainability and health programs and policies

 Monitor overall safety, environment, sustainability and health compliance and performance

● Review and monitor our overall strategies, policies and programs that impact the safety, environment and health of our guests, crew, the communities where we operate and the ports where our ships call

Monitor our overall development of strategies, policies and practices in the areas of energy consumption, greenhouse gas, and other criteria pollutant emissions, waste disposal and water use

Review of our programs and policies relative to environmental sustainability and our environmental sustainability reporting


3028     
20222023 Proxy – Corporate Governance and Board Matters


Table of Contents

Corporate Governance and Board Matters

Talent and

Compensation

Committee

Members:

Vagn O. Sørensen
(Chairman)

(Chair)
John F. Brock


Amy McPherson


Ann S. Moore

Donald Thompson

Meetings Held

During 2021:2022:

5

RESPONSIBILITIES:Responsibilities:

Overall responsibility for approving and evaluating the executive compensation plans, policies and programs of the Company

Annual determination of CEO compensation levels, taking into account corporate goals and CEO performance against these goals

Annual determination of senior executive compensation levels

Periodic review and recommendations for director compensation

Periodic review of talent development programs, human capital management and succession planning

Preparation of Report of the Talent and Compensation Committee (page 69)65)

Independence:

INDEPENDENCE:

The Board has determined that each member of the Talent and Compensation Committee is independent within the meaning of the NYSE and SEC standards of independence for directors and compensation committee members

Board Risk Oversight

BOARD OVERSIGHT

             

2023 Proxy – Corporate Governance and Board Matters     29


Table of Contents

Corporate Governance and Board Matters

Board Risk Oversight

Board Oversight
The Board oversees the Company’s risk profile and management’s processes for assessing and managing risk, through both the whole Board and its committees. At least annually, the Board reviews strategic risks and opportunities facing the Company and its businesses. Other important categories of risk are assigned to designated Board committees that report back to the full Board.

                 
 

COMMITTEES OF THE BOARD

 
Committees of the Board

Committees of the Board consider and review with management at regularly scheduled committee meetings ongoing financial, strategic, operational, legal and compliance risks inherent in the business activities applicable to each committee’s area of responsibility.

The committee chairs inform the Board of the outcome of these reviews through reports to the Board at the regularly scheduled Board meetings.

Audit Committee

Reviews the Company’s guidelines and policies with respect to risk assessment.
Oversees management of risks relating to financial accounting and compliance matters, including risks associated with financial reporting, internal controls, the internal audit function, the Company’s cybersecurity plans, and the Ethics and Compliance Program.
 

Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee

Oversees risks related to the Company’s overall corporate governance, including its corporate governance principles, Board and committee structure and composition, Board’s self-evaluation process, director nominations, and the Board reporting arrangements of the various committees

Talent and Compensation Committee

Oversees risks that are inherent in the design of the Company’s compensation plans, policies and practices

Safety, Environment, Sustainability and Health Committee Charter

Oversees risks related to the Company’s programs and policies in the areas of safety, environment, sustainability, and health
 
 

MANAGEMENT

Management

Management annually performs a Company-wide enterprise risk assessment under the supervision of the Audit & Advisory Services department. This assessment

is updated at least once during the course of the year;

identifies those risks inherent in our business plans and strategies with the greatest potential to impact the achievement of our business objectives; and

is used to provide us with a risk-based approach to managing our business.

Management reviews and discusses the risk assessment report and updates thereto with the Audit Committee and the Board.


30     
20222023 Proxy – Corporate Governance and Board Matters
31


Table of Contents

Corporate Governance and Board Matters

Oversight of COVID-19 Impact

Our Board and its committees have been actively overseeing the Company’s response to and risk management of the ongoing COVID-19 pandemic, including regular updates from and discussions with Company management. In mid-2020, in response to the unprecedented impact of COVID-19 on the cruise industry and our company, our Board established the ad hoc Strategic and Financial Health Committee to assist in the oversight of management’s responsibility to improve the Company’s financial health. During 2020 and 2021, the Committee met regularly to consider and discuss with management the key strategies, actions and metrics to improve the Company’s liquidity and credit worthiness, its financial performance (e.g. earnings and ROIC) and, its short-term and long-term financial health.

In addition, the Talent and Compensation Committee and the Board, as a whole, have actively monitored a broad range of matters during this crisis, including: protecting the health and safety of our employees; minimizing adverse financial impact on affected employees; evaluating the impact of the pandemic on strategy, operations, liquidity and financial matters; assessing the Company’s compensation programs; minimizing chain disruption; monitoring continued compliance with applicable laws; and supporting the communities in which we operate.

Cybersecurity Risk Oversight

Our Audit Committee and our Board oversee the Company’s management of cybersecurity risk. Cyberattacks have continued to intensify in their sophistication and ability to harness information both from the public domain and by means of data exfiltration across public and private institutions. In order to respond to the threat of security breaches and cyberattacks, we have developed a program, overseen by our Chief Information Officer and our Chief Information Security Officer, that is designed to protect and preserve the confidentiality, integrity and continued availability of all information owned by us or in our care. Using a risk-based prioritization approach, our management team focuses on securing our critical assets, updating our cybersecurity detection and prevention capabilities to the new threats, and maturing our compliance processes to protect our operations and our guests.data. We have taken the following foundational steps to address these risks:

1.Established a global cybersecurity operation center that monitors for cyber threats on a 24-hours a day, year round basis;
2.Invested in new surveillance technologies and services to improve the Company’s cyber defense capabilities;
3.Implemented enterprise-wide cybersecurity training, anti-phishing and awareness programs for its employees;
4.Conducted periodic audits and targeted risk assessments of the Company’s IT security capabilities to proactively identify and strengthen cyber defense operations; and
5.The purchase of a cybersecurity insurance policy to provide financial protections.
1.Established a global cybersecurity operation center that monitors for cyber threats on a 24-hours a day, year round basis;
2.Invested in new surveillance technologies, teams and services to improve the Company’s cyber defense and offense capabilities;
3.Implemented enterprise-wide cybersecurity training, anti-phishing and awareness programs for its employees;
4.Conducted simulations involving various levels of management and members of the Audit Committee; and
5.Conducted periodic audits and targeted risk assessments of the Company’s IT security capabilities to proactively identify and strengthen cyber defense operations.

Our Chief Information Officer and Chief Information Security Officer meet with the Audit Committee on a quarterly basis to review our cybersecurity programs and risks, and the ChairmanChair of the Audit Committee informs the Board of the outcome of these committee reviews through updates presented to the Board at the regularly scheduled Board meetings. The full Board also receives periodic briefings on cyber threats in order to enhance our directors’ literacy on cyber issues.

32
2022 Proxy – Corporate Governance and Board Matters

Table of Contents

Corporate Governance and Board Matters


Executive Compensation Risk Oversight

We monitor the risks associated with our compensation programs and individual executive compensation decisions on an ongoing basis. Each year, management undertakes a review of our various compensation programs to assess the risks arising from our compensation policies and practices in accordance with a screening methodology approved by the Talent and Compensation Committee. In 20212022 management reviewed each plan and program for risk features and presented its findings to the Talent and Compensation Committee. The risk assessments included a review of the primary design features of our compensation plans, the process to determine compensation pools and awards for employees and an analysis of how those features could directly or indirectly encourage or mitigate risk-taking. As part of the risk assessments, it has been noted that the Company’s annual incentive plan allows for discretionary negative adjustments to the ultimate outcomes, which serves to mitigate risk-taking. Moreover, senior management is subject to share ownership and retention policies, and historically a large percentage of senior management compensation has been paid in the form of long-term equity awards. In addition, senior management compensation is paid over a multiple-year cycle, a compensation structure that is intended to align incentives with appropriate risk-taking. The Company’s general risk management controls also serve to preclude decision-makers from taking excessive risk to earn the incentives provided under our compensation plans. Based on this review, management and the Talent and Compensation Committee believe that the nature of our business, and the material risks we face, are such that the compensation plans, policies and programs we have put in place are not reasonably likely to give rise to risks that would have a material adverse effect on our business.


20222023 Proxy – Corporate Governance and Board Matters33     31

Table of Contents

Corporate Governance and Board Matters

Shareholder Engagement

WHY WE ENGAGE

We maintain an ongoing, proactive outreach effort with our shareholders. Throughout the year, members of our investor relations team and members of senior management engage with shareholders in order to:

Provide visibility and transparency into our business, our performance, and our corporate governance, ESG and compensation practices;

Discuss with our shareholders the issues that are important to them and share our views; and

Assess emerging issues that may affect our business, inform our decision-making, enhance our corporate disclosures, and help shape our future practices.

SHAREHOLDER ENGAGEMENT PROCESS

Spring

Summer

SHAREHOLDER ENGAGEMENT PROCESS

Spring

Summer

Fall

Winter

Engage with shareholders to gather feedback on compensation and governance practices ahead of the Annual Meeting of Shareholders.

Review results from the Annual Meeting of Shareholders and conduct targeted responsive engagements with shareholders who did not express support for management proposals.

Fall

Winter

Conduct comprehensive engagement with shareholders to discuss developments in the Company’s business and strategy, corporate governance matters, executive compensation design, and business priorities for the upcoming year.

Review shareholder feedback from Fall engagement and discuss with Board potential changes to executive compensation or governance practices in light of feedback received, as well as recommend enhancements to our public disclosures.


20212022 SHAREHOLDER ENGAGEMENT

Subsequent to our 2021 Annual Meeting,Who we contacted
In 2022, we reached out to all of our top 2050 shareholders, representing approximately 55%65% of our outstanding shares of common stock, asking to engage with them on our executive compensation program and our ESG initiatives.

Who we engaged
Based on this outreach, we scheduled and held meetings with 1015 of our top 2025 investors who held an aggregate 38.4%55% of the outstanding shares of our common stock (or 70%90% of the common stock held by our top 2025 investors).

Who is involved in engagement
Members of our Investor Relations team as well as our CEO, CFO,
CEO;
CFO;
Chief Human Resources Officer, People and Outreach Officer;
Chief ESG Officer,Officer; and relevant
Relevant subject matter experts from the management team participated in these meetings as appropriate.
Topics of engagement
During our meetings with investors, we discusseddiscussed:
The recovery of our responsebusiness;
Our plans to the COVID-19 pandemic and our planscontinue to return to healthy sailing,consistent financial performance, restoring our balance sheet, our commitment to the improvement of our sustainability reporting and related environment, social, and governance initiatives,initiatives; and our
Our executive compensation program.

This engagement outreach was in addition to other meetings and discussions that management and investor relations team had throughout the year with shareholders through quarterly earnings calls, individual meetings, road shows, and investor days.

This engagement outreach was in addition to other meetings and discussions that management and investor relations team had throughout the year with shareholders through quarterly earnings calls, individual meetings, road shows, conferences and investor days.


3432     
20222023 Proxy – Corporate Governance and Board Matters



Table of Contents

Corporate Governance and Board Matters

Other Governance Highlights

We are committed to maintaining strong governance policies and practices, some of which we highlight below:

Board Composition,Refreshment andDiversity

 

14 directors

 2

4 of 12 independent directors joined the Board within the last 5 years

 

The 14 members of our Board represent a range of backgrounds and diversity: four (28%five (36%) of our directors are gender / ethnically diverse; three (21%four (29%) of our directors are women; and two (14%three (21%) of our directors are racially / ethnically diverse

 

4 “audit committee financial experts” on our Audit Committee

Board Independence

 

85% of our directors are independent (12 out of 14). Our Corporate Governance Principles require two thirds of our directors to be independent

 

Lead Independent Director (“Lead Director”) with robust duties and responsibilities

 

All members of our Board Committees are independent

Board Responsibilities and Practices

 

All directors attended at least 75% of Board and applicable Board committee meetings

 

Our independent directors regularly meet in executive session without management present, during which the Lead Director presides

 

On an annual basis, the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee oversees an evaluation of Board and Board committee performance

 

The Board, with the support of the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee and the Talent and Compensation Committee, is actively involved in overseeing CEO succession planning

Rights ofShareholders

 

Annual election of directors

 

Majority of votes cast

 

Shareholders with at least 50% of the outstanding shares can call Special Meetings

 

Annual advisory say-on-pay vote

 

No poison pill

Compensation Accountability

 

Equity ownership guidelines

CEO — 8x6x salary

Other named executive officers— 5xofficers — 3x salary

Board of Directors — 3x annual cash retainer

 $300,000

Prohibited hedging or pledging of company securities for all employees and members of the Board of Directors

 

Equity and annual incentive plans permit recoupment in case of a restatement for material non-compliance with financial reporting requirements

Political ContributionsDisclosure

 

In response to shareholder feedback, updated U.S. Political Contributions and Disclosure Policy

No independent expenditures directly in support of or in opposition to any candidate.

No sponsorships of political action committees.

Permissible contributions must be approved by Senior Vice President, Corporate Affairs (or U.S. subsidiary’s most senior officer).

 

Policy and annual voluntary disclosures posted on RCG’s website


20222023 Proxy – Corporate Governance and Board Matters35     33

Table of Contents

Corporate Governance and Board Matters

Certain Relationships and Related Person Transactions

Review and Approval Related Person Transactions

We have a written Related Person Transaction Policy that requires review of all relationships and transactions in which the Company is a participant and in which a “related person” (including any director, director nominee, executive officer or greater than 5% beneficial owner of the Company or any immediate family member of the foregoing) has a direct or indirect material interest. Under this policy, each director, director nominee and executive officer is required to promptly notify the Corporate Secretary of any such transaction. The Corporate Secretary then presents such transactions to the Audit Committee, which is responsible for reviewing and determining whether to approve or ratify the transactions. The following types of transactions are deemed not to create or involve a material interest on the part of the related person and do not require approval or ratification under the policy, unless the Audit Committee determines that the facts and circumstances of the transaction warrant its review:

transactions involving the purchase or sale of products or services in the ordinary course of business, not exceeding $120,000;
transactions in which the related person’s interest derives solely from his or her service as a director of another corporation or organization that is a party to the transaction;
transactions in which the related person’s interest derives solely from his or her ownership of less than 10% of the equity interest in another person (other than a general partnership interest) which is a party to the transaction;
transactions in which the related person’s interest derives solely from his or her ownership of a class of equity shares of the Company and all holders of that class of equity securities received the same benefit on a pro rata basis;
compensation arrangements of any executive officer, other than an individual who is an immediate family member of a related person; and
non-executive director compensation arrangements.
transactions involving the purchase or sale of products or services in the ordinary course of business, not exceeding $120,000;
transactions in which the related person’s interest derives solely from his or her service as a director of another corporation or organization that is a party to the transaction;
transactions in which the related person’s interest derives solely from his or her ownership of less than 10% of the equity interest in another person (other than a general partnership interest) which is a party to the transaction;
transactions in which the related person’s interest derives solely from his or her ownership of a class of equity shares of the Company and all holders of that class of equity securities received the same benefit on a pro rata basis;
compensation arrangements of any executive officer, other than an individual who is an immediate family member of a related person; and
non-executive director compensation arrangements.

In reviewing transactions submitted to them, the Audit Committee reviews and considers all relevant facts and circumstances to determine whether the transaction is in, or not inconsistent with, the best interests of the Company and its shareholders, including, without limitation:

the commercial reasonableness of the terms;
the benefit and perceived benefit, or lack thereof, to the Company;
opportunity costs of alternative transactions;
the character of the related person’s interest; and
the actual or apparent conflict of interest of the related person.
the commercial reasonableness of the terms;
the benefit and perceived benefit, or lack thereof, to the Company;
opportunity costs of alternative transactions;
the character of the related person’s interest; and
the actual or apparent conflict of interest of the related person.

If after the review described above, the Audit Committee determines not to approve or ratify the transaction, it will be cancelled or unwound as the Audit Committee considers appropriate and practicable.

Related Person TransactionTransactions

Barbara Muckermann, Chief Commercial OfficerThere were no related person transactions during 2022.

34     2023 Proxy – Corporate Governance and Board Matters

Table of Silversea Cruises, is the spouse of Roberto Martinoli, PresidentContents

Corporate Governance and CEO of Silversea Cruises. In 2021, Ms. Muckermann earned in excess of $120,000. Ms. Muckermann’s compensation is commensurate with the compensation of her peers and is established in accordance with RCG’s compensation practices applicable to employees with equivalent qualifications, experience and responsibilities.Board Matters

Delinquent Section 16(a) Reports

Section 16(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (the “Exchange Act”) requires our executive officers and directors and persons who own more than 10% of our common stock to file reports of

36
2022 Proxy – Corporate Governance and Board Matters

Table of Contents

Corporate Governance and Board Matters

ownership and changes in ownership with the SEC. Based on our review of such reports and written representations from our directors and officers, one transaction on June 1, 2022 was not timely reported on Form 4 on behalf of Roberto MartinoliR. Alexander Lake due to administrative error.

Corporate Governance Principles

We have adopted Corporate Governance Principles which, along with our Board committee charters, provide the framework for the governance of the Company. The Corporate Governance Principles address such matters as director qualifications, director independence, director compensation, Board committees and committee evaluations. Copies of these principles and our Board committee charters are posted in the corporate governance section on our website at www.rclinvestor.com.

Code of Ethics

The Board has adopted a Code of Business Conduct and Ethics that applies to all our employees, including our executive officers, and our directors. A copy of the Code of Business Conduct and Ethics is posted in the corporate governance section of our website at www.rclinvestor.com and is available in print, without charge, to shareholders upon written request to our Corporate Secretary at Royal Caribbean Cruises Ltd., 1050 Caribbean Way, Miami, Florida 33132. Any amendments to the code or any waivers from any provisions of the code granted to executive officers or directors that require disclosure under the applicable SEC or NYSE rules will be posted on our website at www.rclinvestor.com.

Trading in Company Securities

Our Securities Trading Policy prohibits hedging transactions in Company securities by officers, directors and employees. In addition, it prohibits officers and directors from holding Company Securities in a margin account or otherwise pledging Company securities as collateral for a loan.

Additionally, we require officers and directors to pre-clear every transaction in Company securities for themselves, their immediate family members, and any family trust with the Corporate Secretary. This includes purchases, sales, gifts, contributions to a trust and any other transfers.

Compensation Committee Interlocks and Insider Participation

During 2021,2022, none of the members of the Talent and Compensation Committee (a) was an officer or employee of the Company or any of its subsidiaries, (b) was a former officer of the Company or any of its subsidiaries or (c) had any related party relationships requiring disclosure under Item 404 of SEC Regulation S K. During 2021,2022, no executive officer of the Company served as a member of the board of directors or on the compensation committee of any other company, one of whose executive officers or directors serve or served as a member of the Board or the Talent and Compensation Committee of the Company.

Contacting Members of the Board

The Board welcomes questions and comments. Interested parties who wish to communicate with non-management members of the Board can address their communications to the attention of our Corporate Secretary at our principal address at 1050 Caribbean Way, Miami, Florida 33132 or via email to corporatesecretary@rccl.com. The Corporate Secretary maintains a record of all such communications and promptly forwards to the Lead Director those communications that the Corporate Secretary believes require immediate attention. The Corporate Secretary periodically provides a summary of all such communications to the Lead Director and he, in turn, notifies the Board or the chairs of the relevant committees of the Board of those matters that he believes are appropriate for further action or discussion.


20222023 Proxy – Corporate Governance and Board Matters37     35


Table of Contents

Environmental, Social and Governance Overview

Board Oversight

Our Board provides oversight and guidance on the Company’s performance and management of environmental, social and governance (“ESG”) issues, including climate change, environmental stewardship, supply chain risk management, human rights, diversity, equity and inclusion and ESG reporting.

Our Board provides oversight and guidance on the Company’s performance and management of environmental, social and governance (“ESG”) issues, including climate change, environmental stewardship, supply chain risk management, human rights, diversity, equity and inclusion and ESG reporting.
Safety, Environment, Sustainability and Health Committee
Reviews and monitors overall strategies, policies and programs that impact the safety, environment, sustainability and health of our guests, crew, the communities where we operate and the ports where our ships call, as well as our overall development of strategies, policies, and practices in the areas of energy consumption, greenhouse gas, physical and transition risks related to climate change and other criteria, pollutant emissions, waste disposal and water use.
Talent and Compensation Committee
Oversees the Company’s human capital management strategies, including initiatives for talent diversity, equity and inclusion, talent management, pay equity, succession planning and corporate culture.
Audit Committee
Discusses with management any potential enterprise risks associated with ESG and the controls and procedures concerning the Company’s environmental, social and governance disclosures.
Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee
Oversees various aspects of corporate governance and reviews and makes recommendations to our Board concerning Board and committee structure and composition, consistent with the Board’s endeavor to be composed of individuals with varying skills and backgrounds (including diversity of race, gender and ethnicity) and experience in business and in other areas that may be relevant to the Company’s activities, including those related to ESG.

36     2023 Proxy – Environmental, Social and Governance Overview


Table of Contents

Environmental, Social and Governance Overview

ESG Principles

ESG is at the core of our business and rests on five key principles:

ESG is at the core of our business and rests on four key principles:
Champion Communities and the Environment
We recognize our responsibility to the guests who travel with us, the people who work for us, the communities and destinations that we visit, and the oceans we traverse.
38
2022 Proxy – Environmental, Social and Governance Overview

Table of Contents

Environmental, Social and Governance Overview

Provide Unforgettable Cruise Experiences
We connect people to the wonders of the world and help them create unforgettable memories.
Foster Human Rights and be an Employer of Choice
We treat our guests, employees, crew, and suppliers with dignity and respect. We act ethically and with integrity so we all can thrive.
Advance Net Zero Innovation
We are committed to decarbonizing our operations through innovation, collaborative partnerships, and an accelerated transition to cleaner fuels, smarter technologies, and improved energy efficiencies.
Govern Responsibly
We believe that good governance and transparency are critical to ESG and help us align corporate decision-making to our ESG strategy and performance. We take an integrated approach to board oversight, risk management and stakeholder engagement and we embed appropriate policies and practices for ethics, compliance, and data security within our operations.

2023 Proxy – Environmental, Social and Governance Overview     37


Table of Contents

Environmental, Social and Governance Overview

2022 Priorities

Throughout 2022, Royal Caribbean’s efforts were concentrated on the critical ESG needs of, and issues for, the cruise industry:

Environmental Stewardship
2021 Priorities
Throughout 2021, Royal Caribbean’s efforts were concentrated on the critical ESG needs of, and issues for, the cruise industry:
Environmental Stewardship
Protecting the environment has been a longstanding core value for us. Thriving, healthy and sustainable oceans are inextricably tied to the health of our business that is why we set ambitious targets in a variety of facets of our business to improve our operations including waste and water management, emission reduction, and sustainable sourcing. AsSince returning to full service in 2022, we relaunched the third phase of March 31, 2021, we had removed over 60%the program to advance our goal of eliminating all single-use plastics from our ships compared toships. By the end of 2022, we had achieved a 2018 baseline and anticipate reducing beyond that as we continue our return to service. We have also equipped 100%waste from landfill diversion rate of our ships to be landfill free and produced91%, while producing over 90% of our freshwater on board while reducing thewith an average guest water consumption byrate of 66 gallons per day. Our advanced wastewater purification systems purify all wastewater and exceed regulations for most cities within the U.S. Treated wastewater is discharged at least three nautical miles away from land in accordance with sustainable practices and international law.
2022 Proxy – Environmental, Social and Governance Overview39

Table of Contents

Environmental, Social and Governance Overview

Decarbonization of Operations
We are committed to decarbonizing our operations through meaningful innovation, partnerships, and action. We have been monitoring and reducing emissions and tracking our energy consumption since 2010. In 2021, we announced our Destination Net Zero strategy which is focused on achieving net zero cruise ship by 2035 and net zero emissions by 2050. In 2022, we added to our strategy a near-term target to reduce our carbon intensity by double digits by 2025, aimed at continuing our advancement in decarbonizing our business. Both our near-term reduction target along with our Destination Net Zero isstrategy are built on a four-pronged approach which includes the modernization of our global brands fleet through the introduction of new energy-efficient and alternatively fueled vessels, continued investment in energy efficiency programs, development of alternative fuel and alternative power solutions, and optimized deployment and integration of strategic shore-based supply chains. To help on our journey, we are forging strong partnerships with maritime experts, shipyards, and industry associations such as Maersk Mc-Kinney Moller Center for Zero Carbon Shipping.
A Healthy Return to Cruising
We have long maintained some of the industry’s most rigorous and thoughtful health and safety protocols. Summer of 20212022 marked the first cruise shipreturn of all our ships to set sail from the U.S after a 15-month suspension of service. It also marked over a year’s worth of efforts, going above and beyond, to create a safe, healthy experience for our guests and employees. Since then,We delivered over a6 million guests have sailed with us,vacations in 2022, putting into practice the robust and multi-layered approach that positions our cruises at the forefront of healthy sailing.

38     2023 Proxy – Environmental, Social and Governance Overview


Table of Contents

Environmental, Social and Governance Overview

Responsible Tourism

At its core, tourism depends on the beauty of the environment. Ensuring the destinations we visit are vibrant and healthy far into the future is critical to the success of our business.

At its core, tourism depends on the beauty of the environment. Ensuring the destinations we visit are vibrant and healthy far into the future is critical to the success of our business.

A Partnership for our Oceans

Five years ago,

In 2016, we joined forces with World Wildlife Fund to help ensure the long-term health of the oceans by setting, and achieving, ambitious sustainability targets to lessen the company’s environmental impact, raise awareness of ocean conservation for our guests and crew, and support ocean conservation projects around the world. We have supported WWF initiatives on wildlife trafficking, commitment to deliver on the promise of the Paris Agreement through the We Are Still In coalition and signed on to the Cascading Materials Vision for a more sustainable supply chain.

Exploring the World Sustainably

We deepened our commitment to responsible tourism in 2016, when we set a goal to offer our guests 1,000 destination tours certified by the Global Sustainable Tourism Council (GSTC) by 2020. By 2021, we had more than doubled our 2020 goal, with 2,000-plus GSTC-certified tours available to guests. GTSC-certified tour operators agree to protect the overall health of destinations, preserve local heritage, maximize social and economic benefits to the community, and reduce negative impacts to the environment from travel-related waste. In 2022, we continued to expand this commitment and have now set a goal to have 60% of all tours offered by RCG certified to the GSTC standard by 2025. For us, GSTC certification enables us to align our sustainability philosophy with the practices of our third-party tour operators.

Sourcing Sustainably

40
2022 Proxy – Environmental, Social and Governance Overview

Table of Contents

Environmental, Social and Governance Overview

Sourcing Sustainably

Our supply chain, through a large and diverse network of suppliers, fuels everything we do. As a result, we collaborate with partners to support the sustainable sourcing movement and the improvement of animal welfare throughout the food supply. Most notably we are working with World Wildlife Fund to source Marine Stewardship Council (MSC) and Aquaculture Stewardship Council (ASC) seafood and supporting fishery improvement projects that boost the overall supply of responsibly produced seafood and ensure the livelihoods of artisanal fishers and their communities. Additionally, we worked with the U.S. Humane Society to set targets aimed at improving the treatment of farm animals raised for consumption in our supply chain.


2023 Proxy – Environmental, Social and Governance Overview     39


Table of Contents

Environmental, Social and Governance Overview

Human Capital Management

Great vacations begin with great employees. Each day, our employees from all around the world go above and beyond to deliver exceptional vacations to our guests. Our leadership team, with oversight from our Board of Directors, strives to maintain a work environment that reinforces collaboration, motivation and innovation, and believes that a strong employee-focused culture is essential to a good business.

 
Human Capital Management
Great vacations begin with great employees. Each day, our employees from all around the world go above and beyond to deliver exceptional vacations to our guests. Our leadership team, with oversight from our Board of Directors, strives to maintain a work environment that reinforces collaboration, motivation and innovation, and believes that a strong employee-focused culture is essential to a good business.

Empowering Women in a Male-Dominated Industry

The maritime world has always been male-driven – in fact, there was a time having a woman on board ranked at the top of a long list of sailors’ superstitions. That’s since changed. In 2015, Celebrity Cruises appointed Captain Kate McCue as the first American female captain, starting an intentional effort by the brand to attract more women to the industry and into leadership roles across our fleet. Now, our Celebrity Cruises brand is taking it further, with ambitions to raise the ratio of women to men on their ships’ bridges.

 

Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion

We have always promoted an inclusive workplace – both on land and at sea – where our employees can contribute fully and bring their diverse perspectives to the workplace. We have sixseven employee resource groups (ERGs) with international participation: Multicultural Organization for Royal Employees, Pride (LGBTQ+), Served (Veterans), Network of Women, Royal Organization for Abilities, African Americans, and Young Professionals. Each ERG provides opportunities for employees to connect, network and develop. They also partner with leadership to provide ongoing feedback and establish a culture of belonging. RCG is proud of our diversity achievements, which include being named as a 2021 Forbes Best Employer for DiversityLatino Equity 100 Organization by Latino Magazine and a 20212022 LGBTQ Workplace Equality Honoree by the Human Rights Campaign Foundation. Our DEI efforts and all human capital metrics are reviewed annually with our Talent and Compensation Committee.

 
2022 Proxy – Environmental, Social and Governance Overview41

Table of Contents

Environmental, Social and Governance Overview

Employee Engagement and Development

We measure employee engagement on a quarterly basis on land and monthly on our ships. Since the start of the pandemic, we’ve increased our listening through surveys and focus groups and dedicated ourselves to act on the feedback we receive. We’ve also increased our wellness programs and improved our employee assistance program.

During 2022, we worked on the development of our “Propelled by People” campaign, a new platform to share the voices and stories of our employees and crew members across the world and increase employee engagement.

Our employee development programs are designed to grow and advance our leaders by developing premier learning, mentorship, coaching and planning programs. We are also focused on succession planning and increasing the readiness of internal talent to take on business-critical roles. Our Talent and Compensation Committee regularly reviews our succession planning process and pipeline talent.


40     2023 Proxy – Environmental, Social and Governance Overview


Table of Contents

Environmental, Social and Governance Overview

ESG Reporting
ESG Reporting
We believe in transparency, accountability and continuous improvement. Our reporting reflects our belief that what gets measured gets better. This is why we have published a comprehensive sustainability report since 2008. To maximize the breadth and depth of our disclosures, we followreference the standards established byguidelines of the Global Reporting Initiative and align with the SustainableSustainability Accounting Standards Board.Board (SASB) Industry Standards for Cruise Lines. We have also reported the details of our climate related performance and governance to the CDP Climate Change (formerly known as the Carbon Disclosure Project) since 2010 and have been recognized for taking coordinated action on climate issues. We also continue to work on the publication of an initial report following the recommendations of the Task Force on Climate Related Financial Disclosures (TCFD), which we plan to release in 2023. Our corporate website provides information about our environmental performance goals and sustainability initiatives.

2023 Proxy – Environmental, Social and Governance Overview     41


Table of Contents

Proposal 2

   
                                              
42
2022 Proxy – Environmental, Social and Governance Overview

Table of Contents

PROPOSAL 2

Advisory Vote to Approve the
Compensation of Our Named
Executive Officers


The board
recommends a vote
“FOR” this proposal.

 
 

In accordance with the requirements of Section 14A of the Exchange Act and the related rules of the SEC, our shareholders have the opportunity to cast an advisory vote to approve the compensation of our NEOs.

As described in detail under the heading “Compensation Discussion and Analysis,” we adhere to a pay-for-performance philosophy and, to this end, our executive compensation programs are designed to align the interests of our executives with the interests of our shareholders, recruit, retain and motivate a talented and high-performing management team and reward our NEOs for their positive contributions to both short-term and long-term corporate performance. Shareholders are urged to read the Compensation Discussion and Analysis, which discusses in detail how our compensation policies and procedures implement our compensation philosophy.

42     
20222023 Proxy – Advisory Vote to Approve the Compensation of Our Named Executive OfficersProposal 2
43


Table of Contents

Executive Compensation

Letter from the Talent and Compensation Committee

Dear Shareholders,

While 2021 was another incredibly challengingIt is incredible to consider that just over one year it marked our return to delivering the very best vacation experiences.

Beginning in the third quarter of 2021, RCG was able to commence broad-based operations following the complete lay up of its ships due to the COVID-19 pandemic. To weather the extreme and disproportionate impact of the pandemic on the cruise industry, RCG relied on its leadership team to develop and implement strategies that would position RCG to return to healthy sailing and profitability and drive its long-term financial value.

The year also represented one of significant leadership change. Richard Fain, the company’s CEO for 33 years, announced his decision to step down as CEO. Mr. Fain, a true industry leader, led the growth ofago, Royal Caribbean Group from five vesselswas in 1988the midst of managing Omicron, still in the process of returning ships to service, and sailing at load factors below 60%. Despite these challenges, we finished 2022 on a global company with over 60 ships, three unique brandshigh note as we returned our business to full operations, normalized occupancy levels, achieved positive operating cash flows, and an employee population of 85,000. The successful transitionalso achieved greater revenue per passenger cruise day as compared to 2019. We are proud of the CEO role to Jason Liberty representedefforts of our entire workforce for executing so well on our mission of delivering the culmination of many years of succession planning by Mr. Fainbest vacation experiences, responsibly, and building the Board and will ensure strong leadershipfoundation for RCG into theour future buildinggrowth.

2022 Compensation Program

As we reflect on the challenges and progress from recent years, we remain committed to maintaining strong foundation left by Mr. Fain.

Withexecutive pay and governance practices in which compensation is tied to performance. The Talent & Compensation Committee structured the events of 2021 in mind,2022 compensation program to ensure our decisionsNEOs were appropriately incentivized and rewarded for the year, as described in the Compensation Discussion and Analysis that follows, were focused on ensuring RCG’s financial strength, making prudent financial and operational decisions, returning to service safely and maintaining continuity of management, while staying true to our fundamental pay-for-performance compensation philosophy. In particular:their achievements:

In 2021,

For our President and CEO, we establishedreturned to the historical practice of using solely quantitative financial and objective operational metrics for determining payouts under the short-term incentive plan.

An ESG composite metric was added to both our 2022 Executive Bonus Plan and the metrics used for the PSUs granted in 2022 for the period ending December 2024.

As described in detail in the Compensation Discussion and Analysis (CD&A) section that follows, we implemented a total of seven key performance indicators for our Executive Bonus Plan designed to incentivize our NEOs to 1) ensure RCG’s financial strength, 2) make prudent financial and operational decisions as the company resumed full operations, and 3) advance certain of our ESG goals related to reduction of fuel consumption, progress on initiatives related to diversity, equity and inclusion, and cybersecurity. These changes further enhance the rigor of the compensation structure and strengthen pay and performance alignment.

PSU Awards granted in 2022 for the period ended December 2024 were granted with target performance levels that were challenging and aligned with Board-approved three-year return on invested capital (ROIC), adjusted earnings per share (EPS), leverage, as well as qualitative metrics, that reflectedESG targets.

No discretionary adjustments were made to payouts for the critical actions neededPSUs granted in 2020 for the period ended December 2022, which fell short of our targets due to successfully restart operations and set the performance levels in-line with the 2021 operating plan adopted by the Strategic Health and Finance Committee of the Board. Specifically, these metrics were designed to incentivize management to:

maintain a strong balance sheet to continue to weather the unpredictableextended negative impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on RCG’s business;
develop cost-effective protocols to return RCG’s employees, ships and guests to healthy sailing; and
position RCG to accelerate financial growth, including positive cash flow once sailing resumed.our organization throughout this period.

By the end of 2021, RCG’s NEOs had successfully met these challenges. Specifically, they had:Shareholder Engagement

achieved over $3 billion in liquidity, despite negative operating cash flow of nearly $2 billion, and lowered the cost of debt funding by more than 500 bps vs. 2020;
achieved the industry’s fastest return to service – returning over 37,000 employees and 50 ships to service (including ships operated by Partner Brands), representing over 85% of RCG’s global capacity;
implemented rigorous safety protocols allowing RCG to deliver a healthy sailing environment and extraordinary vacations to approximately 1.3 million guests;
achieved the highest customer satisfaction / net promoter scores (NPS) in RCG’s history; and
made significant progress in RCG’s dedication to ESG, including announcing its “Destination Net Zero” goals.

Based on these accomplishments, the NEOs achievedWe view engagement with our shareholders as a 117.4% payout on the established metrics. Nevertheless, we exercised negative discretion to reduce these payments to a 100% payout in light of

44
2022 Proxy – Executive compensation

Table of Contents

Executive compensation

the impact of the pandemic on RCG’s financial results. Further information on our approach to the 2021 short-term incentive compensation can be found on page 55.

Consistent with the disclosure in last year’s proxy statement and as discussed with shareholders who understood and concurred with our intended use of discretion, we exercised discretion in determining the payout for the performance-based equity awards (PSUs) for the 2019-2021 performance period. We had initially set two metrics tied to income – EPS and ROIC – to evaluate performance over the three-year period, based on RCG’s performance during 2018 and its long-term growth targets. However, because the pandemic forced RCG to shut down its operations and prevented it from generating earnings, we believed it was appropriate to apply discretion in the evaluation of the 2019-2021 PSU Awards and referred to two objective sets of criteria in determining the appropriate level of discretion to apply:
Performance against the prior-established metrics up to the onset of the pandemic. From January 1, 2019, through March 2020, when we ceased operations, RCG was on track to exceed the targets for the 2019-2021 PSU Awards by 111%; and
Relative market performance against the other two publicly-traded cruise companies, as they were the only other similarly situated companies. In deciding the level of achievement, we took into consideration the commentary of shareholders during the 2021 engagement and considered that the actions taken by the NEOs and the entire management team over the course of the pandemic resulted in RCG outperforming these peers in maintaining the company’s value (as measured by market capitalization) and increasing total enterprise value by $7 billion during the 2019-2021 PSU performance period. Furthermore, as demonstrated below, the actions of the NEOs resulted in RCG’s total shareholder return outperforming RCG’s public company cruising peers for both a one-year and three-year period. Based on these measures, we elected to pay out the awards at 90% of target. Further information on our approach to the 2019-2021 PSU Awards can be found on page 63.
When assessing management performance as part of our pay-for-performance philosophy, we normally focus on share performance compared to the general tourism industry. However, the unique challenges of the cruise industry make such comparisons irrelevant. Instead, we compared the company’s shareholder return to our peers.*
*The stock performance graphs assume for comparison that the value of the Company’s common stock and the average of the publicly-traded peer companies’ stock prices was $100 on December 31, 2020 and 2018, respectively, and that all dividends were reinvested. Past performance is not necessarily an indicator of future results.
As disclosed in last year’s proxy statement and discussed with shareholders who understood and concurred with the need to modify long-term targets set prior to the pandemic, we modified our 2020-2022 PSU Awards to align with the revised targets for 2022 EPS and 2022 ROIC established by the Board’s Strategic Financial Health Committee and added a leverage ratio (Debt/EBITDA) consistent with the continued focus on returning to an unleveraged balance sheet. We set the revised threshold, target and maximum performance levels at levels considered to be challenging and materially above the prior year’s actual results. These decisions reflect our commitment to pay-for-performance based on achievement of long-term financial metrics. As operating conditions associated with the pandemic
2022 Proxy – Executive compensation45

Table of Contents

Executive compensation

further stabilize, the Committee is committed to limiting its exercise of discretion to the furthest extent possible, while maintaining appropriate retention and pay-for-performance incentives. Further information on our approach to the 2020-2022 PSU Awards can be found on page 64.
As disclosed in last year’s proxy statement, we successfully implemented a retention program in connection with our CEO transition by granting special equity awards to three NEOs – Messrs. Liberty and Bayley and Ms. Lutoff-Perlo – each whom we believed were critically important to retain in order to ensure a smooth leadership transition and drive continued enterprise growth. Each of these NEOs has significant tenure with RCG – Mr. Liberty has served since 2008 in a variety of positions of increasing responsibility, Mr. Bayley has been with RCG for 40 years and served as President and CEO of two of RCG’s global cruises brands for a total of 9 years and Ms. Lutoff-Perlo has been with RCG for 35 years and served as the President and CEO of one of RCG’s global cruise brands for 7 years. In addition, they each brought unique knowledge and experience to their positions and to RCG as a whole and, in light of these contributions, we considered the potential challenges RCG would encounter if any of them were to leave RCG prior to, or during the transition following, the selection of the new CEO, as well as the additional time and resources that would be required to fill their key leadership roles. This was especially important as our key executives were in high demand across similar leisure industries that had returned to normal service much more quickly and therefore were not similarly impacted by the pandemic. As disclosed in our 2021 proxy statement, the special equity awards granted to these NEOs consisted of (i) 50% time-based awards and (ii) 50% performance-based awards that could be earned upon the achievement of EPS, ROIC and leverage ratio (Debt/EBITDA) targets in-line with the operating plan adopted by the Strategic Financial Health Committee. As part of our shareholder engagement prior to, and subsequent to the 2021 Annual Meeting of Shareholder, we discussed the purpose and need for these special equity awards and heard from our shareholders that they generally recognized the need for exceptional awards in this situation. Further information on our approach to the special equity awards can be found on page 64.

We are proud of the progress RCG has made during such a challenging year. As a Committee, we are committed to continued shareholder engagement.top priority. During the summer/fall 20212022 engagement season, RCG contacted its top 2050 shareholders, representing approximately 55%65% of its outstanding common stock and held meetings with 1015 of them, collectively holding 38.4%about 55% of itsour outstanding common stock (or 70%90% of the common stock held by the top 2025 investors). During these conversations and meetings, most shareholders understood the Talentrationale for the compensation-related actions taken during 2020 and Compensation Committee’s decision-making2021 in order to continue to reward, incentivize and retain our NEOs during such an unprecedented time. They also supported our plans to return to the use of discretion in these difficult times was discussed. We have taken into accountmore quantitative metrics for our incentive compensation program for 2022 as our operations stabilized, as well as the feedback receivedintroduction of ESG measures. As a result of this engagement, 79% of the votes cast at these meetings when making our executive compensation decisions in 2022.2022 Annual Meeting of Shareholders supported our say-on-pay proposal. We intend to continue to engage with our shareholders to ensure that our actions are in-line with, and responsive, to their expectations. We believe that the dedication of RCG to its guests and all of its employees has successfully positioned it to return to growth in a leadership position in 2022 and beyond.

Sincerely,

 2023 Proxy – Executive Compensation     43


Table of Contents

We look forward to continuing to work with the full Board of Directors and executive team in overseeing and executing on our strategic priorities. We will continue to be responsive to our shareholders as we seek to maintain a highly performance-based executive compensation program that drives long-term value creation for our shareholders.

Sincerely,

                    

Vagn O. Sørensen, ChairChairman

John F. Brock

Amy C.McPherson

Ann S. Moore

Donald Thompson


44     DonaldThompson2023 Proxy
46
2022 Proxy – Executive compensation


Table of Contents

Compensation Discussion
and Analysis

Compensation Discussion and Analysis

RCG’s executive compensation program is designed to align executive compensation with the long-term interests of our shareholders. This Compensation Discussion and Analysis (“CD&A”)&A provides shareholders with information about our business, 20212022 performance, our disciplined approach to compensation and 20212022 compensation decisions for our 20212022 Named Executive Officers (“NEOs”) listed below.

As discussed earlier in this proxy statement, on November 6, 2021, Mr. Fain announced that he would be stepping down from his position as Chief Executive Officer effective January 3, 2022. In connection with this transition, the Board promoted Jason Liberty to serve as President and Chief Executive Officer, transitioning from his former position as EVP and Chief Financial Officer, and promoted Naftali Holtz, our former SVP of Finance, to the role of Chief Financial Officer. As these transitions were effective commencingMr. Fain did not receive any compensation in the 2022 fiscal year, they are not reflected in this CD&A.for his role as Chief Executive Officer.

RCG’s 20212022 Named Executive Officers

Richard Fain

Chairman &
Former Chief Executive
Officer

Jason Liberty

President and Chief Executive Officer (“CEO”) and Former Chief Financial Officer

Naftali Holtz

Jason Liberty
Executive Vice
President and
Chief Financial
Officer (“CFO”)

Michael Bayley

President and
Chief Executive
Officer, Royal
Caribbean
International

Lisa Lutoff-Perlo

President and
Chief Executive
Officer, Celebrity
Cruises

Harri U.
Kulovaara

Executive Vice
President,
Maritime

Table of Contents

Table of Contents
Executive SummaryRCG’s 2022 Performance – Key 2022 Successes4846
RCG’s 2021 PerformanceCompensation Overview4847
How We Make Compensation Decisions5350
20212022 Compensation Elements and 20212022 Decisions5451
Compensation Elements5451
Base Salary5552
Performance-Based Annual Incentive5552
Long-Term Equity Incentive Awards6157
Other Elements of Compensation6561
Compensation Policies and Procedures6662
Clawback Policy6763
Equity Grant Practices6763
Stock Ownership Guidelines6864
Prohibition of Pledging/Hedging6864

20222023 Proxy – Compensation Discussion and Analysis47     45


Table of Contents

Executive SummaryCompensation Discussion and Analysis

RCG’s 2021RCG’S 2022 Performance

Navigating the Pandemic and Recovering from the Crisis – Key 20212022 Successes

Successful
Return to
Full Operations
   100%     95%     +3.5%     6 M
of fleet in operation since June 2022

Significant ramp-up in load factors, from 57% in first quarter to 95% in the fourth quarter of 2022

Strong demand for our vacation experiences; 3.5% increase in revenue per passenger cruise day versus 2019

6 million vacations delivered during 2022 at high guest satisfaction scores
Enhancing
Platform for
Long-Term
Growth

≈1,000

 

Launched 3 new ships

Strong pipeline capacity of 10 new ships to be delivered in 2023-2026

Destinations visited

Advanced critical port and destination efforts for a diversified port portfolio

Continued investments in private destinations and our digital infrastructure to enhance our guest experience and commercial capabilitiesIn November 2022, the Company introduced the Trifecta program, a new three-year initiative designed to drive superior performance
Strong Liquidity
and Improving
Financial
Performance

> $2.9 B

Year-end liquidityDisciplined cost management and focus on profitability, abating inflationary cost increases of more than 25% since 2019Successfully refinanced $6.9 billion of debt to manage debt maturity profile

Generated approximately $500M of operating cash flow

ESG is Core to
our Business
Opened the first net zero cruise terminal in Galveston, TexasLaunched a new environmental protection initiative – “Blue Green Promise” – aimed at supporting resilient and sustainable ocean communitiesSet a short-term target for Destination Net Zero to reduce carbon intensity by double digits by 2025

Introduced our “Propelled by People” campaign, a new platform to increase employee engagement


46     2023 Proxy – Compensation Discussion and Analysis
Leading the
Industry in
a Return to
Service
 85% 1.3 M

Brought back 37K+ employees

Fleet capacity operational by 12/31 fastest return in the industry

Lowest out of service cash burn per berth versus our peers

1.3 million guests served in 2021 with only 0.19% COVID-19 positivity rate due to highly effective health and safety protocols

Enhancing
Platform for
Long-Term Growth
 350  

Launched 2 new ships

Strong pipeline capacity with 12 new ships 2022-2026

Destinations visited

Advanced critical port and destination efforts for a diversified port portfolio

Introduced frictionless digital commerce – enhancing guest experience and providing tools to increase revenue

Record guest satisfaction scores and strong onboard revenue drove total revenue per passenger cruise day in Q4 up 10% vs record 2019 levels

Journey Back to
Strong Financial
Results
> $3 B   

Year-end liquidity

Reduced cost of debt funding by over 500bps (vs. 2020)

Successfully refinanced $2.3 billion of crisis debt on an unsecured basis at lower cost

By 4th Quarter, total cash flows from ships in operation turned positive

ESG is Core to
our Business
  7 

Developed a strategic ESG Framework, setting a foundation to guide our decision-making, including adding a new Chief ESG Officer

Launched Destination Net Zero to chart a course toward achieving net zero cruise ship by 2035 and enterprise net zero by 2050

7 times recognized as a World’s Most Ethical Company by Ethisphere

Named as 2021 Forbes Best Employer for Diversity in recognition of our DEI efforts

48
2022 Proxy – Executive Summary


Table of Contents

Executive SummaryCompensation Discussion and Analysis

2021 Compensation Overview

Aligned Strategy and Pay During the Challenges of 2021

At the beginning of 2021, our Talent and Compensation Committee, in coordination with our Strategic Health and Finance Committee, identified five specific and tangible goals to navigate our recovery. These financial and operational metrics were established as the performance metrics for our annual incentive plan. Specifically, the goals were:

preserve liquidity – ensuring we maintain necessary capital during a prolonged period with suspended operations, decreasing burn rate and minimizing dilution to shareholders;
successfully return our ships to service – operating our ships in an effective and safe manner during their lay-up and preparing the ships to return to service with necessary safeguards to prevent the spread of COVID-19 and treat any illnesses;
develop and implement protocols to ensure that crew and guests return to safe sailing;
ensure continued engagement with our crew and shoreside employees; and
develop programs and engagement tools to reignite our guests’ love of sailing.

At the end of the year, our Talent and Compensation Committee reviewed the company’s performance on each of these metrics and found that the management team’s performance against these metrics was positive.

We ended 2021 with $3.6 billion of Liquidity Preservation (as defined on page 57);
As of December 31, 2021, we were operating 50 of our Global and Partner Brand ships, representing over 85% of our capacity;
As of December 31, 2021, we had brought back over 37,000 crew members;
Our health and safety protocols proved highly effective, giving us and our guests comfort regarding onboard safety
For example, approximately 2,500 COVID positive cases on ships out of the 1.3 million guests served in 2021 (representing a positivity rate of 0.19% far under the positivity rate of the general population); and
We achieved the highest customer satisfaction / net promoter scores (NPS) in our history and all-time high onboard revenue spend per passenger.

2022 Proxy – Executive Summary49

Table of Contents

Executive Summary

MaintainedMaintain Robust Corporate Governance Policies that AlignedAlign Executives’ Interests with Those of our Shareholders

Our Talent and Compensation Committee seeks to align our compensation practices with strong corporate governance practices. As reflected below, we believe that robust corporate governance practices are integrated into our 20212022 executive compensation program.

  
What We Do 
What We Do

  Robust stock ownership guidelines - 8x6x base salary for CEO and 5x3x for other NEOs

  What We Do Not Do
No extensive perquisites – All Other Compensation represented approximately 2% of CEO’s 2022 Total Compensation
No acceleration of vesting of equity awards in connection with terminations, absent a change in control
No pledging or hedging of shares
No tax gross-ups on perquisites or change in control benefits
No pension or supplemental retirement plan benefits
Equity plan does not permit liberal share recycling
No liberal change of control definition in equity plan or employment agreements
Clawback policy that applies to cash and equity incentive compensation

  “Double“Double trigger” change in control provisions in employment agreements

  “Double“Double trigger” change in control provision for acceleration of equity

  Short-TermBoth short-term and long-term incentive awards tied to performance metrics designed to deliver long-termgrowth, and drive shareholder value, and align with our ESG commitments

  Multi-year vesting of all equity awards

  New proposed Equity Plan has arequires minimumone-year vesting for all equity awards.awards

Multi-year vesting of equity awards
Independent compensation consultants, report directly to Talent and Compensation Committee
composed entirely of independentdirectors

  Independent compensation consultant,report directly to Talent andCompensation Committee

  Comprehensive annual assessment ofcompensation risks

What We Do Not Do

  No extensive perquisites – AllAnnual say-on-pay voteOther Compensation represented1.14% of CEO’s 2021 Total Compensation

  No acceleration of vesting ofequity awards in connection withterminations, absent a change incontrol

  No pledging or hedging of shares

  No tax gross-ups on perquisites orchange in control benefits

  No pension or supplemental retirement plan benefits

  No repricing or buy-outs of stockoptions without shareholderapproval

  No stock options granted belowfair market value

  Equity plan does not permit liberalshare recycling

  No liberal change of controldefinition in equity plan oremployment agreements

 
  


50
20222023 Proxy – Executive SummaryCompensation Discussion and Analysis     47


Table of Contents

Executive SummaryCompensation Discussion and Analysis

Designed our Executive Compensation to Be Performance BasedPerformance-Based

Our commitment to performance-based compensation is illustrated by the following charts, which show the mix of each compensation component at target levels for our ChairmanPresident & CEO and for our other NEOs for 2021.

2022 (excluding Mr. Fain who served as NEO for only the first two calendar days of 2022).

(1)President & CEOThe percentages for the other NEOs represent a weighted average of each element of compensation for such officers and does not include the special equity awards granted in March 2021.

Other Named Executives

89% Variable Compensation

81% Variable Compensation

Aligned Strategy and Pay

Our executive compensation program ties a significant portion of our NEOs’ compensation to the operational and financial performance of our company. 2022 was a transitional year for the Company which marked the return to full operations and more normalized occupancy levels. In anticipation of this, the Talent & Compensation Committee returned to using a quantitative performance-based approach for our Executive Bonus Plan, as described below. This quantitative approach aligns with our compensation philosophy and in large part with the structure of our pre-COVID-19 compensation program. This approach is also responsive to the feedback we received from our shareholders during 2022. As such, 100% of our CEO’s payout for the Executive Bonus Plan was based on company-wide performance and no longer includes individual performance. As it relates to the long-term performance-based equity awards, the PSU Awards granted in 2022 for the performance period ending December 31, 2024 were granted with target performance levels that were challenging and in-line with Board-approved three-year ROIC, Adjusted EPS and Leverage targets as well as ESG targets. We’ve also embedded ESG targets as part of both short-term and long-term incentive awards to drive continued improvement in areas such as alternative energy sourcing, employee engagement, cyber maturity ratings, and diversity, equity and inclusion initiatives, among others.

Engaged with Shareholders and Responded to their Comments

We have an active shareholder engagement program.It is our long-standing practice to actively engage with our shareholders throughout the year. We believe it is important to directly engage with our shareholders as a means of soliciting their views on matters such as corporate governance, executive compensation and environmental and social initiatives, among other important topics. We use this feedback to assist RCGmanagement and the Board with matters requiring a broader shareholder perspective. We also take into account the feedback our shareholders provide through the annual say-on-pay advisory votes on our executive compensation.

Historically, our shareholders have overwhelmingly supported our executive compensation program, which has received an average of 93%91% support from 2011 when we held our first say-on-pay vote through our 20202022 Annual Meeting of Shareholders. Last year, ISScertain large proxy advisory firms recommended a vote against our say-on-pay proposal, while Glass Lewis recommended a vote in favorproposal. In light of it. Considering these recommendations, prior to the 20212022 Annual Meeting of Shareholders, we engaged with shareholdersconducted a robust shareholder engagement process to further explain our executive compensation program, and our Talent and Compensation Committee’s decisions regarding our pay-for-performance philosophy and the rationale for certain compensation decisions made during 2020 short-term compensation, our anticipated use of discretion with respect to the 2019-2021 PSU Awards, our modificationand 2021 as a result of the 2020-2022 PSU Awardschallenges created by the pandemic and in connection with our special equity awards (all of which were disclosed in our 2021 Proxy Statement).planned leadership transition. During these conversations and meetings, most shareholders supported theseexpressed understanding of our rationale for the compensation-related actions taken during 2020 and understood the need2021 in order to continue to reward, incentivize and retain our NEOs during such an unprecedented time. They also supported our plans to return to the use of more quantitative metrics for our incentive compensation program for 2022 as our operations stabilized as well as the introduction of ESG measures. As a result of this engagement, and our communication of the reasons and need for the use of discretion, 78%79% of the votes cast at our 20212022 Annual Meeting of Shareholders supported our say-on-pay proposal.

After our 2021 Annual Meeting of Shareholders, we continued our conversations with shareholders and engaged in a targeted outreach effort focused on our executive compensation philosophy and decisions. As part of this effort, we contacted our top 20 shareholders, representing approximately 55% of our outstanding common stock and held meetings with 10 of them, collectively holding 38.4% of our outstanding common stock (or 70% of the common stock held by our top 20 investors). During these meetings, we continued to discuss our prior use of discretion with respect to the compensation decisions and actions taken during March 2021, our anticipated limited use of discretion for the 2019-2021 PSU Awards and our intent to return to the historical financial and operational metrics for measuring company-wide and brand performance commencing in 2022. The Talent and Compensation Committee have taken into account the feedback received at these meetings when making their executive compensation decisions.

48     
20222023 Proxy – Executive SummaryCompensation Discussion and Analysis
51


Table of Contents

Executive SummaryCompensation Discussion and Analysis

The table below describes the feedback we received during this engagementour recent engagements related to our executive compensation program and the revisions that our Talent and Compensation Committee implemented for 2022 in light of these discussions.

What We Heard

Actions Taken

Our shareholders generally viewed our management’s performance as best in classstrong and understood our need during a limited time to utilize more qualitative metrics for a limited period of time and exercise discretion with respect to the 2020 short-term incentive plan butin challenging circumstances. However, our shareholders supported us returning to our historical use of quantitative financial and operational metrics once operations had normalized and using limited discretion in evaluating performance against those pre-determined quantitative metrics.

The Talent and Compensation Committee evaluated RCG’s performance using the metrics set earlier in the year and calculated that those metrics generated a payout to equal 117%. However, it utilized negative discretion to reduce the payout to 100% for the NEOs.

For 2022, the short-term incentive plan for the CEO will returnreturned to theour historical practice of being based solely on financial and objective operational metrics, with the short-term incentive plan for the NEOs also being based primarily on financial and objective operational metrics.

The performance-based long-term incentive awards granted in 2022 for the performance period ending December 2024 are based on quantitative financial and operational metrics.

Generally understood and supported our intent to exercise discretion with respect to
The performance-based long-term incentive awards granted in 2022 for the 2019-2021 PSU Awards and to reset our 2020-2022 PSU Awards in-line with new Board approved budgets in light of the unprecedented and disproportionate impact that the COVID-19 pandemic had on the cruise industry.

The Talent and Compensation Committee approved the 2019-2021 PSU Award payout at below target.

The 2021-2023 PSU Awardsperformance period ending December 2024 were granted with target performance levels that were challenging and in-line with Board-approved three-year ROIC, EPS and leverage ratio targets.

The 2022-2024 PSU Awards were granted with target performance levels that were challenging and in-line with Board-approved three-year ROIC,Adjusted EPS, leverage ratio targets as well as ESG targets.

PSUs granted in 2020 for the period ended December 2022 paid out at 35% of target, with no discretionary adjustments.
Understood

Our shareholders understood the competitive nature of our operational performance metrics but generally wanted more transparency with respect to the difficulty of our financial metrics.

This CD&A includes enhanced disclosure of the financial targets and performance levels of Adjusted EPS, which metric determines 60% of the payout under our Liquidity Preservation metric and forcompany-wide performance component of our non-confidential operational metric, Ships in Service, included in our 2021 Executive Bonus Plan.Plan and 40% of the payout under the PSUs granted in 2020 for the period ending December 2022.
Expressed

Our shareholders expressed support for adding ESG measures to our compensation program.

An ESG measures will becomposite metric was added to both our 2022 Executive Bonus Plan and the metrics used for our 2022-the PSUs granted in 2022 for the period ending December 2024 PSU Awards.(as further described below).

2023 Proxy – Compensation Discussion and Analysis     49


Table of Contents

Compensation Discussion and Analysis

Aligned our Compensation with Our ESG Commitments

Our commitment to meet the environmental, social and governance (ESG) challenges of our time is core to our business strategy. Continuous improvement is the persistent wave that drives our work, the ships we build, the infrastructure we develop in coastal communities, and the ESG targets we aim to achieve. As part of that commitment, commencing in 2022, we have embedded ESG metrics in the annual and long-term metrics upon which we evaluate our NEOs. With respect to our annual Executive Bonus Plan, ESG metrics will beare a component of our corporate and our brand operational performance metrics. With respect to our PSU program, 20% of the performance target will beis based on a composite of ESG metrics. These metrics will take into account performance with respect to our goals on alternative energy sourcing, employee engagement, living wagecyber maturity rating from the National Institute of Standards and payTechnology (NIST), and diversity, equity and other initiatives.

52
2022 Proxy – Executive Summary

Table of Contentsinclusion initiatives, among others.

How We Make Compensation Decisions

How We Make Compensation Decisions

Our Compensation Philosophy and Principles

Our fundamental compensation philosophy remains unchanged: we adhere to a pay-for-performance philosophy. In line with this philosophy, we have designed our compensation programs to support three main goals:

Align the interests of our
executives with the interests of
our shareholders
     

Recruit, retain, and
motivate an
elite management team

     

Reward positive contributions
to both short- andshort-and long-term
corporate performance


PRINCIPLESIMPLEMENTATION
PRINCIPLESIMPLEMENTATION

Total direct compensation levels should be sufficiently competitive to attract, motivate and retain the highest quality executives.

Our Talent and Compensation Committee seeks to establish target total direct compensation (salary, short-term incentive and long-term incentive) at appropriate levels relative to our Market Comparison Group, providing our executives the opportunity to be competitively rewarded for our financial and operational and stock price growth.performance. Total direct compensation opportunity (i.e., maximum achievable compensation) should increase with position and responsibility.

Performance-based and “at-risk” incentive compensation should constitute a substantial portion of total compensation.

We seek to foster a pay-for-performance culture, with a significant portion of total direct compensation being performance-based and/or “at risk.” Executives with greater responsibilities and the ability to directly impact our strategic and operational goals and long-term results should bear a greater proportion of the risk if these goals and results are not achieved. Therefore, the more senior the executive, the greater the percentage of total compensation in the form of performance-based and/or “at risk” compensation.

Long-term incentive compensation should align executives’ interests with our shareholders’ interests to further the creation of long-term shareholder value.

We focus on ensuring that executive compensation includes a high proportion of long-term performance-based equity compensation. Awards of equity-based compensation encourage executives to focus on our long-term growth and prospects and incentivize executives to manage our company from the perspective of owners with a meaningful stake and to encourage them to remain with us for long and productive careers. Our stock ownership guidelines further enhance the incentive to create long-term shareholder value. Equity-based compensation also subjects our executives to market risk, a risk also borne by our shareholders.


50     
20222023 Proxy – How We Make Compensation DecisionsDiscussion and Analysis
53


Table of Contents

2021Compensation Discussion and Analysis

2022 Compensation Elements and 20212022 Decisions

2021 Compensation Elements and 2021 Decisions

Compensation Elements

We provide compensation to our executives consisting of three principal elements: base salary, performance-based annual incentive bonus and long-term equity awards. The objectives and key features of each pay element are described below.

 Pay Elements
 Pay ElementsCEOOther NEOs     Objective     Key Features
 CEOOther NEOsObjectiveKey Features
 
Provide a base level of income in-linein line with expertise, experience, tenure, performance, potential and scope of responsibility

Set annually based on market competitiveness and in-line with performance and contributions to the achievement of Company goals

No increases for 2021

Increases, when appropriate, are provided based on market movements, scope of responsibilities, and merit
 

To focus executives on annual financial and operational performance

To reward executives for performance relative to our short-term goals and initiatives

Earned based on company-wide and, brandif applicable, brand-specific financial and operational objective metrics and individual performance against previously established strategic goals,

including, but not limited to, Adjusted EPS (corporate), adjusted brand operating income, if applicable, and an ESG composite

Payout willPayouts range from 0% and 200% based on achievement of results during the year

For our President and CEO, payout is entirely based on corporate performance. For other NEOs, one-third is determined based on individual performance and two-thirds is determined by corporate and, if applicable, brand performance
 
Structured to align with shareholder interests, reward the achievement of long-term goals and promote stability and corporate loyalty among the executives

Earned only if specified financial performance measures are met

Typically, with a three-year performance measure

2021-2023 PSU Awards granted in 2022 for the period ended December 2024 will be earned based on Adjusted EPS, ROIC, Leverage and leverage ratio performance

an ESG composite

2021-2023 PSU Awards granted in 2022 for the period ended December 2024 can range from 0% to 200%

of target
Multi-year vesting requirements align our executives’ interests with our shareholders and incentivize retention of our executive talent
Set annually based on market competitiveness and in-line with performance and contributions to the achievement of Company goals
Increases, when appropriate, are provided based on market movements, scope of responsibilities, and merit.

2023 Proxy – Compensation Discussion and Analysis     51Generally, vest in four equal annual installments, starting on the first anniversary of the grant date
54
2022 Proxy – 2021 Compensation Elements and 2021 Decisions


Table of Contents

2021 Compensation ElementsDiscussion and 2021 DecisionsAnalysis

Base Salary

Why we pay base salaries. Base salaries comprise, on average, less than 20% of the target total direct compensation for our NEOs. During 2021,2022, base salary represented 8%11% of target total direct compensation for our CEO and an average of 17%19% for our other NEOs. However, base salaries are an important and customary element of pay for attracting and retaining executives. The Talent and Compensation Committee seeks to pay each NEO a level of base salary that competitively reflects their scope of responsibility.

The primary considerations used in setting base salary levels include each NEO’s:

scope of responsibilities;

expertise and experience;

tenure with the organization

competitiveness as measured against the Market Comparison Group; and

performance and potential to further our business objectives

The Talent and Compensation Committee generally reviews salaries in the early part of each year and, if appropriate, adjusts them to reflect changes in the above considerations and to respond to market and competitive pressures.

Our 20212022 Base Salary Decisions. Decisions. The Talent and Compensation Committee approved base salary increases for 2022 for each of Mr. Liberty and Mr. Holtz to account for their increased roles and responsibilities following their respective promotions to Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer in early 2022. The Talent and Compensation Committee also considered compensation benchmarking provided by the Committee’s independent compensation consultant and adjusted the base salary for Mr. Liberty and Mr. Holtz to move them closer to the market median for their respective positions. The Talent and Compensation Committee approved modest base salary increases for the other NEOs in recognition of their strong leadership during the pandemic and the Company’s successful return to service. In February 2021, based onmaking this determination, the ongoing impactTalent and Compensation Committee also considered that none of the pandemic, including suspension of our cruising operations, there were no changes toNEOs received a base salaries.salary increase in 2021.

  Base SalaryBase Salary     Percent
Change
Name       2021     2021     2022
Richard D. Fain     $1,300,000
Jason T. Liberty  $950,000$950,000$1,200,000     26.3%
Naftali Holtz(1)$n/a$675,000n/a
Michael W. Bayley  $1,000,000$1,000,000$1,050,0005.0%
Lisa Lutoff-Perlo  $820,000$820,000$861,0005.0%
Harri U. Kulovaara  $810,000$810,000$850,5005.0%
(1)Mr. Holtz was a NEO for the first time in fiscal 2022.

Performance-Based Annual Incentive

Why we pay annual performance-based compensation. We believe that annual incentive programs focus executives on annual financial and operational performance enabling them to better manage the cyclical nature of our business and to reward executives for performance relative to our annual goals and initiatives. We pay our annual performance-based compensation pursuant to our Executive Short-Term Bonus Plan (the “Executive Bonus Plan”). The Executive Bonus Plan is designed to reward our executives for the achievement of RCG’s annual financial and/or strategic goals and to recognize individual contributions. For 2021,2022, the Executive Bonus Plan represented approximately 19%23% of our CEO’s target total direct compensation and an average of 22% of the other NEOs’ target total direct compensation.

How we measure annual performance. Prior to the pandemic, we measured annual performance-based on (1) company-wide and brand financial and operational results, depending on the NEO’s responsibility and (2) on individual performance against previously established strategic objectives. For 2019, company-wide and brand financial and operational key performance indicators (“KPIs”) represented 100% of the annual bonus opportunity for the CEO and 66.67% for each other NEO while individual performance strategic objectives represented the remaining 33.33% of the bonus opportunity for each other NEO. In 2020, given the complete uncertainty of the economic and operational environment attributable to the COVID-19 pandemic, the Talent and Compensation Committee set nine strategic areas of focus against which it would evaluate the company-wide annual performance for the CEO and each other NEO, representing 80% of the bonus opportunity for the CEO and 50% of the bonus opportunity for each other NEO. Individual performance represented the remaining 20% of the bonus opportunity for the CEO and 50% of the bonus opportunity for each other NEO.

2022 Proxy – 2021 Compensation Elements and 2021 Decisions55

Table of Contents

2021 Compensation Elements and 2021 Decisions

In 2021, the Talent and Compensation Committee elected to return to more normalized annual performance KPIs, such that each NEO was evaluated on company-wide financial and operational performance as well as individual performance. Due to the continuing uncertainties that existed at the beginning of 2021 and the need for extraordinary cross-functional cooperation and support, the Talent and Compensation Committee believed that the financial and operational KPIs should be based on company-wide metrics for all NEOs, rather than a combination of company-wide and brand-wide metrics.

For 2021, the framework of the Executive Bonus Plan was as follows:

      2021 Executive Bonus Plan Framework
Name Company-Wide
Performance
     Individual Performance
Against Strategic
 Objectives
CEO 80% 20%
Other NEOs 66.67% 33.33%

How we determine annual target bonus. Each year, the Talent and Compensation Committee considers the responsibilities of each executive and the competitiveness of our target bonus opportunity compared to our Market Comparison Group. The Talent and Compensation Committee then sets the annual Executive Bonus Plan Targettarget for each NEO, as a percentage of base salary. Based onFor 2022, the market environment, thereTalent and Compensation Committee approved an increase to the Executive Bonus Plan target for Mr. Liberty and Mr. Holtz in connection with the Company’s leadership transition and their respective promotions. There were no changes to the bonus targetstarget percentages for 2021.the other NEOs.

Name     2021 Bonus Target
 (% of base salary)
     2021 Target Payout
Richard D. Fain 225%                 $2,925,000
Jason T. Liberty 145% $1,377,500
Michael W. Bayley 140% $1,400,000
Lisa Lutoff-Perlo 130% $1,066,000
Harri U. Kulovaara(1) 100% $810,000
52     2023 Proxy – Compensation Discussion and Analysis


Table of Contents

Compensation Discussion and Analysis

Name     2022 Bonus Target
(% of base salary)
     2022 Target Amount
Jason T. Liberty200%                 $2,400,000
Naftali Holtz100%$675,000
Michael W. Bayley140%$1,470,000

Lisa Lutoff-Perlo

130%$1,119,300
Harri U. Kulovaara(1)100%$850,500
(1)Based on his unique and focused responsibilities, in addition to his bonus target, Mr. Kulovaara’s employment agreement provides that he is entitled to a bonus of $150,000 for each ship delivered during a fiscal year. During fiscal year 2022, the Company took delivery of two new ships.

2021 Company-Wide Metrics; Weighting and Performance

In establishing the 2021 Executive Bonus Plan company-wide metrics in early 2021,How we measure annual performance. For 2022, the Talent and Compensation Committee believed thatreverted to the mostpre-COVID framework of the Executive Bonus Plan, pursuant to which annual performance is based on: (1) company-wide performance as well as brand performance, depending on the NEO’s areas of responsibility and (2) for NEOs other than the CEO, individual performance against previously established strategic objectives. Company-wide and brand performance is measured 60% based on financial measures (Adjusted earnings (loss) per share for company-wide and adjusted brand-specific operating income for brand performance) and 40% based on a composite of financial, operational, and ESG-related key performance indicators (“KPIs”).

For 2022, the framework of the Executive Bonus Plan was as follows:

2022 Executive Bonus Plan Framework
Name     Company-
Wide
Performance
     Brand
Performance
     Individual Performance
Against Strategic
Objectives
Jason T. Liberty100%
Naftali Holtz66.67%                            33.33%
Michael W. Bayley(1)33.34%          33.33%33.33%
Lisa Lutoff-Perlo(2)33.34%33.33%33.33%
Harri Kulovaara66.67%33.33%
(1)Brand performance for Mr. Bayley was based on Royal Caribbean International
(2)Brand performance for Ms. Lutoff-Perlo was based on Celebrity Cruises

2023 Proxy – Compensation Discussion and Analysis     53


Table of Contents

Compensation Discussion and Analysis

Metrics Comprising the Executive Bonus Plan

Company-Wide PerformanceBrand PerformanceIndividual Performance

60%
Adjusted EPS

60%
Adjusted Brand Operating Income

100%
Evaluation by Talent and
Compensation Committee of
individual performance for NEOs
other than the CEO

40%
Financial, Operational and
ESG-Related KPIs

40%
Financial, Operational and
ESG-Related KPIs

7%Liquidity
7%Adjusted Gross Margin
7%Net Promoter Score/
Guest Satisfaction
7%Safety and Security
6%Employee Engagement
6%ESG Composite Index
7%Percentage Capacity
in Operations
7%Adjusted Gross Margin
7%Net Promoter Score/
Guest Satisfaction
7%Safety and Security
6%Employee Engagement
6%ESG Composite Index

Company-Wide Financial Metric. For 2022, the Talent and Compensation Committee approved using Adjusted EPS as an important financial metric for evaluating annual company-wide metrics would be thoseperformance, reflecting our renewed focus on delivering profitable growth as we resumed operations.

In accordance with the terms of the Executive Bonus Plan, the Talent and Compensation Committee adjusted this number for purposes of 2022 annual bonuses to account for fuel price and interest rate variances from the prices and rates used for the Company’s initial forecast when setting targets, net of hedging impacts. These adjustments avoid penalizing or benefiting our NEOs for significant fluctuations in fuel prices and interest rates that positioned RCGare outside of the initial forecasted range and over which they have no control. In addition, and consistent with the Talent and Compensation Committee’s discretion under the Executive Bonus Plan, the net financial results and interest expense related to begin cruising once permitted by the CDCopportunistic acquisition of the Silver Endeavour vessel were excluded from the Company’s financial results, as the targets for the Executive Bonus Plan were established prior to that acquisition. This adjustment increased Adjusted EPS.

The table below sets forth the targets and other governmental agencies. Consequently, the six equally-weighted, company-wide metrics establishedachieved performance results approved by the Talent and Compensation Committee for 2021this financial metric.

 
Payout
     2022
Approved
Results
     Payout
%
Metric       Weighting       0%       90%       100%       110%       150%       200%
Adjusted EPS ($ Million)60%($17.03)($8.79)($6.54)($4.29)($2.37)$3.95($6.82)98%

2022 KPIs for Company and Brand Performance. In establishing the 2022 Executive Bonus Plan KPIs for both company-wide and brand performance, the Talent and Compensation Committee focused on selecting metrics that would best position the Company to safely and efficiently return to operations, while also incentivizing strong financial performance. Although 2022 represented a unique transitional year, the Talent and Compensation Committee supported the return to the historical practice of using solely quantitative financial and operational metrics as opposed to qualitative measures when measuring annual company-wide and brand performance. The table below sets forth each KPI, the weighing of each KPI and how they were as follows:measured. The target achievement levels for each KPI was set to require significantly challenging, but attainable, results.

54     One financial metric, Liquidity Preservation;2023 Proxy – Compensation Discussion and Analysis


Table of Contents

Compensation Discussion and Analysis

KPIsWeightHow Evaluated
FinancialFour objective operational metrics,

Liquidity(1) Ships

7%

The amount of cash and cash equivalents, undrawn capacity under the Company’s credit facilities and available but undrawn loan commitments as of December 31, 2022, adjusted to exclude transaction costs related to proactive financing actions to address near-term debt maturities and the impact of fuel price increases. This metric was intended to reward NEOs for their cost-management initiatives and their success in Service, driving debt and equity raising activities.

Adjusted Gross Margin

7%

Gross Margin, adjusted for payroll and related fuel, food other operating expenses, depreciation and amortization, and the net financial results and interest expense related to the opportunistic acquisition of the Silver Endeavour vessel. Gross Margin is calculated as total revenues less total cruise operating expenses and depreciation and amortization.

Operational

Percentage Capacity in Operations(2)

7%

Percentage of available passenger cruise days (“APCDs”) in operation during 2022. APCD is our measurement of capacity and represents double occupancy per cabin multiplied by the number of cruise days for the period, which excludes canceled cruise days and cabins not available for sale.

Net Promoter Scores (NPS) /
Guest Satisfaction (3) Employee Engagement

7%

Third party surveys / net promoter scores, measuring customer satisfaction with their most recent cruise, his or her intent to cruise again with us and (4) his or her willingness to recommend that others cruise with us.

Safety and Health;Security

7%

Composite score comprised of safety incident frequency and severity, audit and compliance scores, COVID protocols and other safety, security, environment and health measures, which we believe are key to our extremely high safety and security standards and our goal of being a good steward of the environmental resources we manage.

Employee Engagement

6%

Quarterly pulse surveys, conducted by outside firm, of shoreside and shipboard employees measuring both employee satisfaction and employee engagement, which is defined as the tendency of employees to exert discretionary effort for our benefit.

ESG

One qualitative metric, Return to Service Performance, which reflected a qualitative analysis

ESG Composite Index

6%

Composite of numerous multi-faceted objectivesthe following three equally-weighted quantitative ESG metrics that would contributemeasure our progress with respect to our abilitygoals on (1) improvement of cybersecurity maturity rating from the National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST), (2) programs related to safelydiversity, equity, and efficiently commence operations.inclusion, and (3) reduction of fuel consumption per berth.

(1)This measure was used for purposes of evaluating company-wide performance only.
(2)This measure was used for purposes of evaluating brand performance only.

The Talent and Compensation Committee established a threshold performance levellevels for each metric and performance levels at which executives could earn from a threshold of 50% up to a maximum of 200%, along with performance measures identified at 90%, 100%, 110%, and 200%150%. Although historically the Executive Bonus Plan provided for performance levels that ranged from 0% to 300% for company-wide and brand-wide metrics and 0% to 200% for individual performance, due to the continued uncertainty arising from the impact of the pandemic, for 20212022 the Talent and Compensation Committee capped the maximum performance at 200% for both the company-wide and brand performance metrics and the individual performance metric. Achievement in between these performance levels would be calculated on a linear basis (except for the qualitative metric which was evaluated based on those distinct levels articulated above).basis.


56
20222023 Proxy – 2021 Compensation ElementsDiscussion and 2021 DecisionsAnalysis     55


Table of Contents

2021 Compensation ElementsDiscussion and 2021 DecisionsAnalysis

Company-Wide Financial Metric – For 2021, the Talent and Compensation Committee determined that the most important financial metric was Liquidity Preservation - the amount of cash and cash equivalents and undrawn capacity under the Company’s credit facilities as of December 31, 2021, adjusted to exclude transaction costs from the early partial redemption of certain senior secured notes due 2025 and the impact of fuel price increases. The Talent and Compensation Committee believed that maintaining a strong balance sheet would allow RCG to weather the continued uncertainty facing RCG and the industry due to the pandemic. Furthermore, the Talent and Compensation Committee believed that by measuring Liquidity Preservation as of the fiscal year-end, the NEOs would be rewarded for their cost-management initiatives and debt and equity raising activities, while retaining flexibility to use each of these tools as the executives believed was most appropriate. The table below sets forth the targets and the performance achieved for this financial metric.

    Payout 2021
Results
 Payout
%
Metric     Weighting     0%     90%     100%     110%     200%          
Liquidity Preservation ($ Billion) 16.67% $1.8 $2.6 $3.6 $4.6 $5.4 $3.625 100.2%

Company-Wide Objective Operational Metrics – The Talent and Compensation Committee also set four objective operational company-wide metrics at the corporate level, rather than by brand, which it believed to be most reflective of the actions necessary to successfully return to operations. The table below sets forth each operational metric, the weighting of the metric, how the metric was measured and the percentage achieved. Targets for each of the other operational KPIs were set at levels that the Talent and Compensation Committee anticipated would be challenging but achievable. For example, our Ships in Service threshold was set at 21 ships while target was 40 ships, even though we had no ships operating revenue cruises on January 1, 2021, at the beginning of the performance period. Target performance levels for our Guest Satisfaction (or NPS) were set based on the all-time high levels achieved in 2019, even though no one knew at the time of setting the targets what type of restrictions and limitations would be placed on cruising guests and how this would affect their travel experience.

Objective
Operational Metric
     Weight     How Evaluated     Payout %
Ships in Service 16.67% Number of our Global Brand Ships (RCI, Celebrity and Silversea) operating revenue cruises by December 31, 2021 92%
Guest Satisfaction 16.67% Third party surveys / net promoter scores, measuring customer satisfaction with their most recent cruise, his or her intent to cruise again with us and his or her willingness to recommend that others cruise with us 129.2%
Employee Engagement 16.67% Quarterly pulse surveys, conducted by outside firm, of shoreside and shipboard employees measuring both employee satisfaction and employee engagement, which is defined as the tendency of employees to exert discretionary effort for our benefit 100.9%
Safety and Health 16.67% Composite score comprised of safety incident frequency and severity, audit and compliance scores, COVID protocols and other safety, security, environment and health measures, which we believe are key to our extremely high safety and security standards and our goal of being a good steward of the environmental resources we manage 100.7%

In evaluating the company-wide performance ofunder each of the operational metrics, the Talent and Compensation Committee notedabove KPIs, it is useful to highlight that:

Our Shipsfinancial KPIs (i.e., liquidity and adjusted gross margin) paid out on average at 99% of target, reflecting improvement in Service performance was slightly below target, with 36 Global Brand ships in service at the endour financial results following resumption of the year;operations and our strong liquidity position as of year-end;

Our Guest Satisfaction performance, which is basedoperational KPIs paid out on third-party measured net promoter scores (NPS), materially exceededaverage at 87% of target, and set a Company new all-time high of guest satisfaction, leadingprimarily attributable to record revenue per passenger cruise day in the fourth quarter of 2021;

Our Employee Engagement performance met target, materially exceeding the global benchmark according to third-party data sources; and
Our Safety and Health performance met target, which included the COVID-19 positivity rate among our cruising guests being materially less than the communitybenchmarks for employee engagement and the successful implementation of robust COVID-19 safety and security protocols to ensure the safe return of our ships into service.service; and

2022 Proxy – 2021

Our ESG composite index exceeded target, with an average payout across the three subcomponents of 133% of target. For this component, the Talent and Compensation Elements and 2021 Decisions

57

Table of Contents

2021 Compensation Elements and 2021 Decisions

Company-Wide Qualitative Metric – Our “Return to Service” metric was a reflection of multiple qualitative objectivesCommittee considered that the Talent and Compensation Committee reviewed with respect to the organization as a whole. The weighting for this metric was only 16.67%, and the Talent and Compensation Committee determined that this metric had been met at the 175% performance level. The material factors that the Talent and Compensation Committee cited in evaluating this metric are set forth below.

MetricDescription
LEADERSHIP DURING THEPANDEMICSuccessfully led the company’s (and industry’s) returnCompany successfully delivered on four specific goals related to service following 15 monthspay equity initiatives, development of suspension, launching the first U.S. passenger cruise in the industry with “Celebrity Edge” sailing out of Florida in June 2021executive council on diversity, and the first cruise outexpansion of Alaska in July 2021 after partnering with government officials to ensure a safeemployee resource groups for underrepresented racial and successful return
Leadership in communicationethnic groups. In addition, the Company exceeded targets for NIST cybersecurity maturity rating and collaboration with multiple regulators, other cruise companies and key stakeholders globally to facilitate return to cruising, often representing the industry in addition to the company
Developed a proprietary technology, reinventing the cruise industry’s standard safety drill into a more personal process that promotes higher levels of safety. Successfully worked with international regulators, the U.S. Coast Guard and other maritime and government authorities to achieve the launch of the new technology, meeting all safety requirements
Prioritized long-term success over short-term decision making by keeping fleet more active during layup and restarting faster
Allowed the company to demonstrate to customers and regulators the ability to operate safely and prepare towards 2022/23 cruise seasons
CONTRIBUTION TO LIQUIDITYMethodical and well-timed capital raises for an aggregate of $4.7 billion in debt and equity capital bolstered liquidity and advanced financial health targets
Re-established reliable access to unsecured markets, issuing over $3 billion of unsecured notes with an investment-grade covenant package and lowering the cost of debt funding by over 500bps (vs. 2020)
Achieved and maintained the targeted out of service burn rate for the first six months of 2021 despite increased debt levels
SAFE OPERATION OF VESSELSDeveloped an enterprise-wide playbook to ensure a consistent, safe and quick return to service for the fleet (ship investments, crew return, protocols)
Completed enhancements to Medical Facilities and HVAC system for all ships returning to service and private destinations at favorable costs
GOVERNMENT
RELATIONS
AND CDC
COORDINATION
RCG continued leadership of the Healthy Sail Panel – a group of more than 10 of the world’s leading experts on, among other things, infectious disease, epidemiology, biosecurity and microbiology, including former heads of the HHS, FDA and CDC
Strong collaboration with CDC and key stakeholders to enable resumption of U.S. cruising and transition of the Conditional Sailing Order into a voluntary framework in 2022, and led frequent working sessions on behalf on the industry
Demonstrated to CDC the benefits of the “Healthy Return to Sailing” protocols through multiple “test sailings,” and all ships that applied have been approved for resumption of sailing with no exceptions
HEALTHY RETURN
OF CREW AND
SHORESIDE OFFICES
We returned more than 37,000 crew from various countries and made vaccines available to all returning crew members through partnerships with various world governments. By the end of 2021, we operated 85% of our fleet’s capacity, with 100% vaccinated crew back on board.
Managed the administration of approximately 162,000 crew PCR tests to meet CDC and brand guidance
Successfully reopened the South Florida offices, providing a safe working environment for our employees with frequent free COVID-19 testing provided to employees
ORGANIZATIONAL
EFFECTIVENESS
AND EFFICIENCY/
RESTRUCTURING
Established an organizational efficiency program to facilitate ideation, evaluation and execution of cross functional and brand initiatives
Realized $35 million of benefits in 2021 (in revenue and costs)
Groundwork completed to realize significantly higher benefits in 2022
fuel consumption per berth.

58
2022 Proxy – 2021 Compensation Elements and 2021 Decisions

Table of Contents

2021 Compensation Elements and 2021 Decisions

Individual Performance. The individual performance component of our Executive Bonus Plan awards is intended to reward managerial decision-making, behavioral interaction, and overall contribution. As discussed above, for our CEO, individual performance represented 20% of his bonus opportunity and for each of our other NEOs, individual performance represented 33.33% of the bonus opportunity for each of our NEOs except for Mr. Liberty, as his bonus was based 100% on corporate performance. None of the individual goals are material to understanding the Executive Bonus Program or how annual targets were determined for 2022. The Talent and Compensation Committee approves the final individual achievement and bonus payout for each of the other NEOs based on the CEO’s recommendation.

The Talent and Compensation Committee considered each NEOs achievement of his or her bonus opportunity.individual goals and overall contribution to our successful growth, how each one directed their area of responsibility to meet ongoing challenges of the pandemic during 2022, and the results of specific projects they were responsible for during the year. In evaluating the performance of each NEO during 2022, the Talent and Compensation Committee consideredhighlighted the following achievements for each NEO.2022, among others:

NEOsKey Performance Highlights

Returned our business to full operations and delivered vacation experiences to 6 million guests;

Richard D. Fain
Chairman & Chief
Executive Officer
Achieved the fastest return in the industry by successfully leading RCG back into operations following 15 months of suspension.

Resumed quarterly guidance and launched Trifecta, a new three-year financial performance initiative designed to drive superior performance;

Announced

Successfully raised over $9 billion of capital to refinance debt in a net zero carbon emissions program consisting of comprehensive decarbonization goals that include achieving net zero emissions by 2050.difficult market environment;

Provided ongoing leadership in communication

Delivered Wonder of the Seas and collaborationCelebrity Beyond vessels with multiple regulators, other cruise companies and key stakeholders globally to facilitate return to cruising, often representing the industry in addition to the Company.positive reviews;

Continued leadership

Launched Icon of DEI with the achievementSeas bookings for sale, which was the most successful launch in Company history in terms of over half our U.S. shoreside population being ethnic or racially diverseload factors and over half of our global shoreside population being females. Continued commitment to pay by surpassing “living wage” for all U.S. employees.booked ticket revenues;

Implemented reopening plans for global shoreside offices, prioritizing the health and safety of employees, while reinforcing a collaborative and innovative culture.
Facilitated the Company’s recognition as 2021 Forbes Best Employers for Diversity, 2021 Forbes Best Employers, Human Rights Campaign Foundation — 2021 Corporate Equality Index (CEI) LGBTQ Workplace Equality Honoree, 2022 Glassdoor Best Places to Work — US Companies and named 2022 Glassdoor Top CEO.
Jason T. Liberty
Executive Vice
President, Chief
Financial Officer
Navigated the company financially through the COVID-19 pandemic by achieving liquidity targets to support operations, investments, return to service requirements and obligations.

Achieved financial goals related to raising capital, lowering the costreduction of debt funding,food waste while navigating supply chain and issuing equity while preserving the health of the organization and minimizing dilution to shareholders, as compared with industry peers.food inflation challenges;

Demonstrated care

Implemented additional initiatives related to safety and compassion for crew members, employees,compliance; and the trade partners; provided over $21 million in relief funds through “RCL Cares” across 78 countries to support crew members facing hardship with the industry shut down.

Led organizational restructuring initiative, focused on effectiveness and efficiency, leading to $35 million in realized benefits in 2021 and guided the successful divesture of the Azamara brand from the RCG portfolio.
Provided leadership in connection with the Company’s DEI initiatives in the areas of mentoring, sponsorship and expansion of parental benefits.
2022 Proxy – 2021 Compensation Elements and 2021 Decisions59

Table of Contents

2021 Compensation Elements and 2021 Decisions

Michael W. Bayley
President and Chief
Executive Officer,
Royal Caribbean
International
Represented Royal Caribbean Group in partnering with the CDC and government officials to create a set of recommendations to protect the public health and safety of our guests, crew and communities in which RCG cruise ships call. The recommendations were outlined in the Healthy Sail Panel’s 65- page report which includes 74 detailed best practices.
Achieved 100% approval from the CDC for all “test sailings” in 2021 for Royal Caribbean International, a requirement established to demonstrate successful protocols prior to revenue sailings.
Instrumental in guiding the resumption of 20 Royal Caribbean International ships back to service, returning over 45,000 crew members while achieving exceptional safety onboard for passengers and crew.
RCI became the first cruise line to embark on a return to Alaska in July 2021 after partnering with government officials to ensure a safe and successful return.
Achieved record breaking NPS scores across the fleet since returning to operation, delivering on guest expectations with all available venues onboard open and most excursions operational.
Served as a board member of the Cruise Line Industry Association (“CLIA”) Global Executive Committee and a member of the CLIA global Board of Directors.
Led “Americas Cruise Task Force,” co-chairing a task force of over 20 countries with Prime Minister Mia Mottley of Barbados and cruise industry executives to coordinate and create standard operating health protocols to commence cruising to Caribbean destinations.
Lisa Lutoff-Perlo
President and Chief
Executive Officer,
Celebrity Cruises
Successfully led the return of sailing in North America with “Celebrity Millennium” sailing from Philipsburg, St. Maarten, followed by “Celebrity Edge” as the first cruise ship out of a U.S. port, sailing out of Ft. Lauderdale, Florida in June 2021.
Instrumental in guiding the resumption of 11 Celebrity ships back to service, returning over 15,000 crew members while achieving exceptional safety onboard for passengers and crew; recognized as an industry leader by health experts and media for being the first brand to implement a fully vaccinated protocol onboard.
Achieved record high NPS scores, onboard revenue and growth in direct revenue since the resumption of sailing.
Continued to innovate with the launch of “Isn’t it Time” campaign driving increased growth in specific target markets.
Maintained leadership in diversity and inclusion efforts within the Celebrity organization through promotion and sponsorship of females in officer positions and advancement of bridge officers; was awarded the TPG (The Points Guy) first ever Empowerment Award and was named an International Maritime Hall of Fame Award Honoree.
Harri U. Kulovaara
Executive Vice
President, Maritime
Concluded optimization of newbuilding portfolio scope by revaluating the cost complexity of projects, yielding hundreds of millions in savings or reinvestment opportunities for our brands.
Together with key stakeholders, safeguarded our portfolio by proactively assessing and addressing requirements for future deliveries/options.
Jointly established long-term business approach with our main shipyard partners.
Helped advance

Advanced our Destination Net Zero “journey to carbon free” strategy.

Successfully led deliveries of Odyssey, Wonder, and Dawn vessels under unique circumstances.
Advanced the work related to newbuild projects with scaled ambitions for Beyond, inTUItion, MS7, and Silver Nova vessels.
Facilitated the completion of 41 medical center upgrades across the fleet, exceeding new regulations and bringing a consistent approach to the new facilities.

60

2022 Proxy – 2021 Compensation Elements and 2021 Decisions


Table of Contents

2021 Compensation Elements and 2021 Decisions

2021 Executive Bonus Plan PaymentsPayouts

Based on the achievement levelsabove KPIs and financial performance results, the following table shows the 2022 Executive Bonus Plan payout as a percentage of target for each company-wide metric set forth above,award component and the actual total achievement for the company-wide metricspayout amount.

Payout % per ComponentTotal Payout %
(rounded)
Target
2022 Payout
Actual Total
2022 Payout
Name     Corporate     Brand     Individual               
Jason T. Liberty     97.7%N/A       N/A97.7%   $2,400,000   $2,344,800
Naftali Holtz97.7%N/A120%            105.1%$675,000$709,645
Michael W. Bayley97.7%96.8%130%108.2%$1,470,000$1,590,035
Lisa Lutoff-Perlo97.7%79.1%100%92.3%$1,119,300$1,032,747
Harri U. Kulovaara97.7%N/A105%100.1%$850,500$851,632

In addition to his award under the Executive Bonus Plan, was 117%, but the Talent and Compensation Committee exercised negative discretion and reducedawarded Mr. Kulovaara a special performance bonus of $300,000 for the achievement on company-wide metrics to 100%. As discussed above, eachdelivery of two new ships in 2022: Wonder of the NEOs met theirSeas and Celebrity Beyond. This success also contributed to Mr. Kulovaara’s individual performance strategic objectives at 100%. Consequently, payments under the Executive Bonus Plan for 2021 were equal to 100%component performance.

56     2023 Proxy – Compensation Discussion and Analysis


Table of the respective NEOs target. In addition to the amounts earned under the Executive Bonus Plan, Mr. Kulovaara is entitled to receive a bonus of $150,000 for each ship delivered during a fiscal year. During fiscal year 2021, RCG took delivery of three ships; however, based on the impact of the pandemic, the TalentContents

Compensation Discussion and Compensation Committee exercised negative discretion to reduce the aggregate amount from $450,000 to $300,000. The amounts paid are set forth below in our Summary Compensation Table.Analysis

Long-Term Equity Incentive Awards

Why we pay equity-based compensation. Our long-term incentive award program is the most significant element of our overall compensation program. During 2021,2022, annual long-term incentive awards represented 73%66% of our CEO’s target total direct compensation and an average of 60%58% of target total direct compensation for our other NEOs. The Talent and Compensation Committee’s philosophy is that a majority of an executive’s compensation should be based directly upon the value of long-term incentive compensation in the form of time-based restricted stock units and performanceperformance-based restricted stock units so as to align with shareholder interests, reward the achievement of long-term goals and promote stability and corporate loyalty among the executives. The Talent and Compensation Committee believes that providing executives with the opportunities to acquire significant stakes in our growth and prosperity (through grants of equity-based compensation), while maintaining other components of our compensation program at competitive levels, will incentivize and reward executives for sound business management, develop a high-performance team environment, foster the accomplishment of short-term and long-term strategic and operational objectives and compensate executives for improvement in shareholder value, all of which are essential to our ongoing success.

How equity-based compensation is determined. Annually, the Talent and Compensation Committee evaluates the appropriate form and mix of equity-based compensation that RCG will grant as part of its long-term incentive compensation and approves the dollar value of long-term equity awards that will be granted to each NEO. In the beginning of each year, the Talent and Compensation Committee determines the target equity award value (“LTI Value”) to be delivered to each NEO.

In the beginning of each year, the Talent and Compensation Committee determines the target equity award value (“LTI Value”) to be delivered to each NEO. In determining the appropriate long-term incentive award value, the Talent and Compensation Committee considers:

the compensation paid to comparable executives in the Market Comparison Group;

a review of each of the elements of total direct compensation; and

the NEO’s contribution to the overall results of the Company.

To strike an appropriate balance between performance and retention incentives, we use a combination of time-based restricted stock units/shares, which we refer to as Time-Based RSUs, and performance-based restricted stock units/shares, which we refer to as PSUs.

Time-Based Equity. To promote retention and align our executive’s interests with long-term stock appreciation, the Time-Based RSUs vest in equal annual installments over a four-year period commencing on the first anniversary date of the grant. As Time-Based RSUs are inherently tied to the performance of our common stock, we consider a vesting schedule based on continued service appropriate to incentivize retention and performance.

2022 Proxy – 2021 Compensation Elements and 2021 Decisions61

Table of Contents

2021 Compensation Elements and 2021 Decisions

Performance-Based Equity. Each PSU is expressed as a target number of PSUs, with the actual number that cancould be earned for the grants made in 2022 ranging from 0% to 200% of the target based on our performance results with regards to the predetermined metric or metrics across the measurement period. Annually the Talent and Compensation Committee determines (1) the metrics that will be used for the PSUs, (2) the weighting of each metric and (3) a threshold, target and maximum performance level. Below the threshold level, all PSUs are forfeited. At the target level, 100% of the target number of PSUs are earned and at the maximum level, 200% of the target number of PSUs are earned. The threshold, target and maximum performance levels are set based on prior year performance and our long-term growth targets.


2023 Proxy – Compensation Discussion and Analysis     57


Table of Contents

2021Compensation Discussion and Analysis

2022 Equity Awards

For 2021,2022, the Talent and Compensation Committee approved an increase to the LTI Value for Mr. Liberty (from $3,500,000 to $7,000,000) and Mr. Holtz to reflect their new positions and expanded scope of responsibilities. All other NEOs maintained the same annual LTI Value for eachas 2021 as set forth below.

Name     2021 LTI
Value
     2022 LTI Value
Richard D. Fain $11,250,000
Jason T. Liberty $3,500,000        $7,000,000
Naftali Holtz$1,400,000
Michael W. Bayley $5,000,000$5,000,000
Lisa Lutoff-Perlo $2,750,000$2,750,000
Harri U. Kulovaara $1,500,000$1,500,000

As discussed above, the Talent and Compensation Committee then allocated the total LTI Value between Time-Based RSUs and Performance-Based Awards.PSUs. For the 20212022 compensation program, consistent with prior years, we provided long-term incentive awards for all NEOs allocated as follows.set forth below. The Talent and Compensation Committee believes that the use of both Time-Based RSUs and PSUs is consistent with competitive market practice and that the allocation set forth below effectively and efficiently balances both performance and retention objectives.

For the 2021-2023 PSU Award,Awards granted in 2022 for the period ending December 2024, the Talent and Compensation Committee decided to (1) continue to use Adjusted EPS, ROIC, and ROICLeverage (Net Debt/Adjusted EBITDA) as the applicable performance metrics and (2) added a leverage ratio (Debt/EBITDA)add an ESG composite as a new performance metric to drive the achievement of ESG-related performance goals and further align executive compensation with stakeholder interests.

ROIC is a performance metric that measures how effective the Company is at generating a return for investors who have provided capital (i.e., lenders and shareholders). We define ROIC as “Adjusted Operating Income (Loss)” divided by “Invested Capital.” Adjusted Operating Income (Loss) represents operating income (loss) including income (loss) from equity investments and income taxes but excluding certain items that we believe adjusting for is meaningful when assessing our operating performance on a comparative basis, which for 2022 consisted of: impairment and credit losses, restructuring charges and other initiative expenses, and the amortization of the Silversea Cruises intangible assets resulting from the Silversea Cruises acquisition in 2018. Invested Capital represents the most recent five-quarter average of total debt (i.e., current portion of long-term debt plus long-term debt) plus total shareholders’ equity.


58     2023 Proxy – Compensation Discussion and Analysis


Table of Contents

Compensation Discussion and Analysis

The inclusion of Leverage was intended to incentivize our NEOs to pay down crisis-debt in an effort to return to an investment grade credit profile. Leverage is defined as “Net Debt” divided by “Adjusted EBITDA”, whereby (1) Net Debt represents total debt (i.e., the current portion of long-term debt plus long-term debt) less cash and cash equivalents and (2) Adjusted EBITDA represents EBITDA excluding certain items that we believe adjusting for is meaningful when assessing our profitability, which for 2022 included other income (expense) in our consolidated statements of comprehensive loss, impairment and credit losses, and restructuring charges and other initiatives. EBITDA represents net income (loss) excluding (i) interest income; (ii) interest expense, net of interest capitalized; (iii) depreciation and amortization expenses; and (iv) income tax benefit or expense.

The ESG composite evaluates performance based on the Board’s belief that a primary focusfollowing equally-weighted quantitative measures: five specific energy efficiency goals for our vessels, employee engagement scores, and cybersecurity risk rating from NIST.

The threshold, target, and maximum levels for payouts of the NEOs should be returnPSUs granted in 2022 for the period ended December 2024 were set to an unlevered balance sheetalign with the Company’s long-term targets as soon as possible.established by the Board’s Strategic Financial Health Committee in 2021. The performance metrics werewill be weighted 40%30% for each of the Adjusted EPS metric, 40% for theand ROIC metricmetrics, and 20% for each of the leverage ratioLeverage metric and the ESG composite metric. Similar to prior years,The payout level for the percentage of equity awardedgrants made in the form of PSUs to2022 will be determined by our CEO was higher than that awarded to our other NEOs due to the Talent and Compensation Committee’s belief that the CEO’s compensation should be primarily performance based.

62
2022 Proxy – 2021 Compensation Elements and 2021 Decisions

Table of Contents

2021 Compensation Elements and 2021 Decisions

Payout under 2019 Performance-Based Equity Awards

In February 2022, the Talent and Compensation Committee determined the payout for the PSUs issued to the NEOs in early 2019. Consistent with the disclosure in last year’s proxy statement and as discussed with shareholders who understood and concurred with the intended use of discretion, the Talent and Compensation Committee exercised discretion in determining the payout for the performance-based equity awards (PSUs) subject to the 2019-2021 performance period. For the 2019-2021 performance period, the Talent and Compensation Committee had initially set two metrics tied to income - EPS and ROIC - to evaluate performance over the three-year period. The threshold and target performance levels had been set based on performance during 2018 and our long-term growth targets, with the threshold performance level being set at 20% above the 2018 actual EPS and target performance level at 32% above the 2018 actual EPS. However, because the pandemic forced us to shut down our operations and prevented us from generating earnings, the Talent and Compensation Committee believed it was appropriate to apply discretion in the evaluation of the 2019-2021 PSU2025.

Payout under 2020 Performance-Based Equity Awards and referred to two objective sets of criteria in determining the appropriate level of discretion to apply:

Performance against the prior-established metrics up to the onset of the pandemic. From January 1, 2019, through March 2020, when we ceased operations, RCG was on track to exceed the targets for the 2019-2021 PSU Awards by 111%.
Relative market performance against the other two publicly-traded cruise companies, as they were the only other similarly situated companies. In deciding the level of achievement, the Talent and Compensation Committee took into consideration the commentary of shareholders during the 2021 engagement and considered that the actions taken by the NEOs and the entire management team over the course of the pandemic resulted in RCG outperforming these peers in maintaining the company’s value (as measured by market capitalization) and increasing total enterprise value by $7 billion during the 2019-2021 PSU performance period. Furthermore, as demonstrated below, the actions of the NEOs resulted in RCG’s total shareholder return outperforming RCG’s public company cruising peers for both a one- and three-year period.*

*The stock performance graphs assume for comparison that the value of the Company’s common stock and the average of the public-traded peer companies’ stock prices was $100 on December 31, 2020 and 2018, respectively, and that all dividends were reinvested. Past performance is not necessarily an indicator of future results.

Based on these factors, and in-line with our equity plan documents, the Talent and Compensation Committee took into consideration the achievement of results prior to the COVID-19 pandemic and the shareholder value maintained since the pandemic to exclude the impact of fiscal year 2020 and 2021 on the attainment of the financial metrics during the performance period and utilized discretion in its determination to payout the PSUs at 90% of the original targeted number of shares.

2022 Proxy – 2021 Compensation Elements and 2021 Decisions63

Table of Contents

2021 Compensation Elements and 2021 Decisions

Adjustment of Financial Metrics for the 2020-2022 PSU Awards


Our PSUs for the 2020-2022 performance period were setgranted in February 2020 for the period ended December 2022 were set before the eventual impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on our business was understood. Consistent with prior years, the Talent and Compensation Committee had adopted Adjusted EPS and ROIC as the two financial metrics, with the threshold, target and maximum performance levels being set based on the budgeted long-term growth targets and the 2022 Adjusted EPS and 2022 ROIC targets adopted by the Board. As disclosed in last year’s proxy statement and discussed with shareholders who understood and concurred with the need to modify long-term targets set prior to the pandemic, in March 2021, the Talent and Compensation Committee modified the PSUs granted in March 2021 modified our 2020-2022 PSU AwardsFebruary 2020 for the period ending December 2022 to align with the revised targets for 2022 Adjusted EPS and 2022 ROIC established by the Board’s Strategic Financial Health Committee and added a leverage ratio (Debt/Leverage metric (Net Debt/Adjusted EBITDA) to reflect the continued focus on returning to an unleveraged balance sheet.. The new performance metrics arewere weighted 40% based on our Adjusted EPS performance, 40% based on our ROIC performance and 20% based on our Leverage ratio performance.

The revised threshold, target and maximum performance levels were set at levels considered to be challenging and materially above the prior year’s2020 actual results. These decisions reflectThe targets for Adjusted EPS, ROIC and Leverage metrics were set at $0.20, 3.60%, and 10.80, respectively. In determining the level of performance achieved for each of the three metrics, the Talent and Compensation Committee accounted for variances in fuel prices, interest rates, and foreign exchange rates from the Company’s forecast when setting targets, net of hedging impacts. These adjustments avoid penalizing or benefiting our NEOs for significant fluctuations in fuel prices, foreign exchange rates, and interest rates that are outside of the initial forecasted range and over which they have no control. In addition, for purposes of calculating Adjusted EBITDA for the Leverage metric, the Talent and Compensation Committee excluded equity investment income from our joint ventures that are not consolidated in our financial statements.

2023 Proxy – Compensation Discussion and Analysis     59


Table of Contents

Compensation Discussion and Analysis

In February 2023, the Talent and Compensation Committee determined the payout for the PSUs issued to the NEOs in 2020 for the performance period ended December 2022. Due to the extended negative impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on our organization throughout this period, the resulting amounts approved by the Talent and Compensation Committee for Adjusted EPS, ROIC, and Leverage came in below targets at ($5.52), -1.1%, and 20.66, respectively. The table below sets forth the final payout amounts for each NEO. Given the Committee’s commitment to pay-for-performance, based on achievementthe Committee did not exercise discretion to adjust the final payout amounts for any of long-term financial metrics.the NEOs.

Name     Target Shares     Final Payout %     Shares Earned
Richard D. Fain(1)76,56235%26,797
Jason T. Liberty19,05535%6,669
Naftali Holtz3,37635%1,182
Michael W. Bayley27,22235%9,528
Lisa Lutoff-Perlo14,97235%5,240
Harri U. Kulovaara8,16735%2,858
(1)Although Mr. Fain did not serve as an NEO after January 3, 2022, the performance shares issued to him in 2020 continued to vest. Refer to the section on “Vesting into Retirement Policy” on page 64.

Payout under 2021 Special Equity Awards

The
As described in last year’s proxy statement, the Talent and Compensation Committee successfully implemented a retention program in connection with our CEO transitionstransition in 2022 by granting special equity awards in March 2021 to three NEOs – Messrs. Liberty and Bayley and Ms. Lutoff-Perlo – each of whom it believed were critically important to retain in order to ensure a smooth leadership transition and drive continued enterprise growth. Each of these NEOs has significant tenure with the Company – Mr. Liberty has served since 2008 in a variety of positions of increasing responsibility, Mr. Bayley has been with RCG for 40 years and served as President and CEO of two of RCG’s global cruises brands for a total of 9 years and Ms. Lutoff-Perlo has been with RCG for 35 years and served as the President and CEO of one of RCG’s global cruise brands for 7 years. In addition, they each brought unique knowledge and experience to their positions and to RCG as a whole and, in light of these contributions, the Talent and Compensation Committee considered the potential challenges the Company would encounter if any of themThe awards were to leave RCG prior to, or during the transition following, the selection of the new CEO, as well as the additional time and resources that would be required to fill their key leadership roles. This was especially important as our key executives were in high demand across similar leisure industries that had returned to normal service much more quickly and therefore were not similarly impacted by the pandemic.

Based on these considerations, the Talent and Compensation Committee approved special equity awards to each of Mr. Liberty, Mr. Bayley and Ms. Lutoff-Perlo equal to two times each executive’s normal annual equity award.

The Talent and Compensation Committee structured these awards with the goal of (i) reinforcing our continued emphasis on the return to normal financial health and (ii) ensuring that these NEO’s continued focus was on returning to service as quickly as practicable. Therefore, each of these awards was (i) 50% in the form of Time-Based RSUs and (ii) 50% in the form of PSUs. The Time-Based RSUs vest 50% on the second anniversary of the grant date and the 50% on the third anniversary of the grant date. The PSUs are earned (1) 50% on a two-year performance period, January 1, 2021 through December 31, 2022 (“First Tranche”) and (2) 50% on a three-year performance period from January 1, 2021 through December 31, 2023.2023 (“Second Tranche”). The financial metrics upon which the PSUPSUs can be earned are Adjusted EPS, ROIC and leverage ratio (Debt/Leverage (Net Debt/Adjusted EBITDA), the same as those utilized for the 2021-2023 PSU Awards.Awards granted in 2021 for the period ending December 2023. The target performance level was set by the Talent and Compensation Committee in-line with the operating plan adopted by the Strategic Financial Health Committee, while the threshold was set slightly below the budget and the maximum was set at a level that was deemed to be significantly challenging. As the purpose of these awards were continued active engagement of our NEOs, these special equity awards

64
2022 Proxy – 2021 Compensation Elements and 2021 Decisions

Table of Contents

2021 Compensation Elements and 2021 Decisions

were not subject to the “Vesting Into Retirement Policy” described on page 6864 and are subject to forfeiture if any of the NEOs leftleave the Company prior to the respective vesting dates.

Consistent with the payout percentage for the PSUs granted in 2020 for the performance period ended December 2022, the First Tranche of the PSU component of the special equity awards vested at 35% of target. The table below sets forth the final payout for the First Tranche. The Talent and Compensation Committee did not exercise discretion to adjust the final payout results noted below.

Name     Target Shares for First Tranche     Final Payout %     Shares Earned
Jason T. Liberty20,63035%7,220
Michael Bayley29,47135%10,315
Lisa Lutoff-Perlo16,20935%5,673

60     2023 Proxy – Compensation Discussion and Analysis


Table of Contents

Compensation Discussion and Analysis

Other Elements of Compensation

In an effort to offer our employees a competitive remuneration package, we provide them with certain retirement, medical and welfare benefits, including a qualified non-contributory profit-sharing retirement plan. The NEOs are eligible to participate and/or receive such benefits on a basis commensurate with that of other employees.

Since January 1, 2009, as a result of Section 457A of the U.S. Internal Revenue Code, in lieu of contributions to the Royal Caribbean Cruises Ltd. Supplemental Executive Retirement Plan (the “SERP”), each NEO receives, on an annual basis, a lump-sum cash payment of the benefits that would have been accrued under the SERP for services in a given year but for a change in tax laws. Amounts earned in 20212022 in lieu of the SERP benefit are disclosed in the Summary Compensation Table — All Other Compensation column, as further detailed in the “2021“2022 All Other Compensation Table.”

We also offer the NEOs certain perquisites which include: Company paid automobile leases, annual executive physicals, and life insurance coverage equal to five times their annual base salary. In addition, our executives who have been on international assignments are also eligible to receive tax equalization and preparation assistance. NEOs also receive free and discounted Company cruises, and, annual executive physicals. In addition, from time to time, family members may accompany our NEOs on business travel, either on chartered aircraft or on cruises, all of which is provided at little or no incremental cost to the Company. Our executives who have been on international assignments are also eligible to receive tax equalization and preparation assistance. Our NEOs also receive life insurance coverage equal to five times their annual base salary.cost.


20222023 Proxy – 2021 Compensation ElementsDiscussion and 2021 DecisionsAnalysis65     61


Table of Contents

Compensation PoliciesDiscussion and ProceduresAnalysis

Compensation Policies and Procedures

Roles and Responsibilities

TALENT ANDCOMPENSATION COMMITTEE

Our executive compensation program is overseen by the Talent and Compensation Committee. Talent and Compensation Committee
Our executive compensation program is overseen by the Talent and Compensation Committee. Talent and Compensation Committee members are appointed by our Board and meet the independence and other requirements of the NYSE and other applicable laws and regulations. Talent and Compensation Committee members are selected based on a variety of factors, including their knowledge and experience in compensation matters.
CEO
For each NEO other than the CEO, the Talent and Compensation Committee consults with and receives the recommendation of the CEO, but the Talent and Compensation Committee is ultimately responsible for determining whether to accept such recommendations. For the compensation related to the CEO, the Talent and Compensation Committee meets in executive session and considers the opinion of its compensation consultant(s) as well as other criteria identified in this Compensation Discussion & Analysis.

CEO

Compensation Consultant
As provided for in its charter, the Talent and Compensation Committee has sole discretion to retain a compensation consultant and is directly responsible for the appointment, compensation and oversight for such consultant’s work. In 2022, the Talent and Compensation Committee retained Willis Towers Watson as its independent compensation consultant to provide advice on the following:
For each NEO other than the CEO, the Talent and Compensation Committee consults with and receives the recommendation of the CEO, but the Talent and Compensation Committee is ultimately responsible for determining whether to accept such recommendations. For the compensation related to the CEO, the Talent and Compensation Committee meets in executive session and considers the opinion of Willis Towers Watson as well as other criteria identified in this Compensation Discussion & Analysis.

COMPENSATION CONSULTANT

As provided for in its charter, the Talent and Compensation Committee has sole discretion to retain a compensation consultant and is directly responsible for the appointment, compensation and oversight for such consultant’s work. For 2021, the Talent and Compensation Committee retained Willis Towers Watson as its independent compensation consultant and asked Willis Towers Watson to regularly provide independent advice on the following:

●   the composition of our Market Comparison Group;

our compensation plan risk;

current trends in executive and director compensation design; and

the overall levels of compensation and types and blend of various compensation elements.

In May 2022, the Talent and Compensation Committee retained Meridian Compensation Partners, LLC (“Meridian”), as its new independent compensation consultant. Meridian’s work during the second half of 2022 consisted of review of our stock ownership guidelines, peer group composition, compensation benchmarking of senior executive pay structure, and review of Board compensation trends in anticipation of the Committee’s decisions on compensation program design in 2023.

Each of Willis Towers Watson and Meridian had direct access to the Talent and Compensation Committee’s members and advised them regarding matters for whichduring the Talent and Compensation Committee is responsible.period of their respective engagements in 2022. Within this framework, Willis Towers Watsoneach was instructed to work collaboratively with management, including our CEO and our Chief Human Resources Officer to gain an understanding of our business and compensation programs to help Willis Towers Watson advise the Talent and Compensation Committee.programs. In addition, during 2021 Willis Towers Watsoneach consultant regularly conferred with our senior management and human resources department to collect, analyze and present data requested by the Talent and Compensation Committee.


6662     
20222023 Proxy – Compensation PoliciesDiscussion and ProceduresAnalysis


Table of Contents

Compensation PoliciesDiscussion and ProceduresAnalysis

Market Comparison Group

Our Market Comparison Group is the foundation of our annual compensation review — which begins in September and runs through February — and is used to help guide the Talent and Compensation Committee’s decisions regarding competitive pay levels and design architecture.

How We Choose Our Market Comparison Group

Although we strive for consistency, theThe list of companies that comprise our Market Comparison Group arewas developed by Willis Towers Watson, our independent compensation consultant for 2021 and the first half of 2022. Although we strive for consistency, the list is reviewed and approved annually by the Talent and Compensation Committee using the following criteria:

Availability of public information— company is publicly-traded and compensation data is available in public filings

Relevant industry group— company included in at least one of ten leisure and tourismwithin the consumer discretionary sector under the Global industry groupsClassification Standard (GICS)

Equivalent revenue— company is within approximately 0.5 to 2 times our revenue

Similar business strategy— company falls under hospitality, hotels and motels, leisure time, leisure products or resort industry categories

Global Footprint— company has significant operations outside of the United States

Historical precedent— company included in the prior year’s Market Comparison Group


Based on considerations of the factors above, Willis Towers Watson did not recommend, and the Talent and Compensation Committee did not make, any changes to the Market Comparison Group from 2021. The below Market Comparison Group which was approved by our Talent and Compensation Committee in September 2020, was used to inform 20212022 compensation decisions.

Booking Holdings Inc.
Caesars Entertainment Corp.
Carnival Corp.
Darden Restaurants, Inc.
eBay Inc.
Expedia Inc.
Hilton Worldwide Holdings, Inc.
Norwegian Cruise Line
Caesars Entertainment Corp.Las Vegas Sands Corp.
Holdings Ltd.
Carnival Corp.Live Nation Entertainment, Inc.
Starbucks Corp.
Darden Restaurants, Inc.Marriott International Inc.
Wyndham Worldwide Corp.
eBay Inc.McDonald’s Corporation
Wynn Resort Ltd.
Expedia Inc.MGM Resorts InternationalNorwegian Cruise Line
Holdings Ltd.
Starbucks Corp.
Wyndham Worldwide Corp.
Wynn Resort Ltd.
Yum Brands IncInc.

Clawback Policy

For awards of PSUs, RCG has adopted a “clawback” policy applicable to the award recipients, including the NEOs. If, for the two year period following the end of the three-year performance period of each award, RCG is required to restate its financial results for the award performance period in a manner that would have adversely affected the number of PSUs subject to the award, the Talent and Compensation Committee may (regardless of any fault on the part of the participant) adjustrequire the number of PSUs subjectaward recipient to forfeit and/or repay an amount equal to the award to reflectdifference between the numberamount actually awarded based on the erroneous financial data and the amount of PSUscompensation that wouldshould have been payableawarded to the recipient under the restatedaccounting restatement or the adjusted financial statements, as determined by the Talent and Compensation Committee. For example, for the grants made in February 2021,2022, the compensation recoupment period would extend to December 31, 2025.2026.

Equity Grant Practices

Timing of Equity Awards:Awards: The Talent and Compensation Committee generally grants annual equity awards to NEOs and other members of management at the first regularly scheduled Talent and Compensation Committee meeting of the calendar year, usually held in February. Equity awards may be granted outside of the annual grant cycle in connection with events such as hiring, promotion or extraordinary performance or as part of a special retention effort.

20222023 Proxy – Compensation PoliciesDiscussion and ProceduresAnalysis67     63


Table of Contents

Compensation PoliciesDiscussion and ProceduresAnalysis

Vesting Into Retirement Policy: Starting with grants made in 2014, certainCertain of our executives may be eligible for accelerated or continued vesting of applicable long-term equity awards under our “Vesting Into Retirement” policy. In recognition that different motivations and considerations prevail for officers approaching retirement, awards granted to senior executives who are at least 62 years of age and who have been employed by RCG for at least 15 years are generally not subject to forfeiture upon termination of employment after the later of the first anniversary of the grant date and the first anniversary of the date that the officer meets both the age and service criteria. In order to maintain an alignment of interest with our shareholders, these awards continue to be subject to restrictions on transfer that will lift over a four-year period for the RSUs and over a three-year period for PSUs (mirroring the typical vesting schedule for these awards).

Stock Ownership Guidelines

We recognize the importance of aligning our management’s interests with those of our shareholders. As a result, the Board, at the recommendation of the Talent and Compensation Committee, has established stock ownership guidelines for all of our officers. Under these guidelines, the NEOs are expected to accumulate over a designated period, Company stock having a fair market value equal to the multiples of their base salaries as shown in the table below.

Name     Stock Ownership

Amount (base salary


multiple)
Chief Executive Officer86 times
All Other NEOs53 times

Stock owned outright, unvested time-based restricted stock, and the earned portion of performance-based stock awards count towards the stock ownership amount. Officers are required to retain 50% of the net after-tax shares received under any equity awards until they meet the applicable ownership amount. Once an officer’s target stock ownership is achieved, or upon expiration of the applicable accumulation period, an officer will be permitted to sell Company stock only to the extent that, immediately following such sale, the officer continues to meet the applicable ownership amount. Each NEO is currently satisfiesin compliance with the stock ownership guidelines.

Prohibition of Pledging/Hedging

We have a policy that prohibits the members of our Board and our officers and employees from engaging in pledging and hedging transactions with respect to our securities, including through the use of instruments such as prepaid variable forwards, equity swaps, collars and exchange funds, and from short selling our securities.

6864
20222023 Proxy – Compensation PoliciesDiscussion and ProceduresAnalysis


Table of Contents

Report of the Talent and
Compensation Committee

Report of the Talent and Compensation Committee

The Talent and Compensation Committee has reviewed and discussed with management the Compensation Discussion & Analysis and, based on such review and discussion, has recommended to the Board that the Compensation Discussion & Analysis be included in this proxy statement and incorporated by reference into our Annual Report on Form 10-K for 2021.2022.

THE TALENT AND COMPENSATION COMMITTEE

Vagn O. Sørensen, Chairman
Chair
John F. Brock

Ann S. Moore

Amy McPherson

Donald Thompson

20222023 Proxy – Report of the Talent and Compensation Committee69     65


Table of Contents

Executive Compensation Tables

Executive Compensation Tables

Summary Compensation Table

The following table presents certain summary information for the fiscal years ended December 31, 2019, 2020, 2021 and 20212022 concerning compensation earned for services rendered in all capacities by our CEO, our CFO and our other three most highly compensated executive officers during the fiscal year ended December 31, 2021.2022. We refer to these officers collectively as our named executive officers or NEOs.

Name and Principal
Position
    Year    Salary    Stock
Awards(1)(2)
    Non-Equity
Incentive Plan
Compensation(3)
    Declined
Non-Equity
Incentive
Plan
Compensation
    Change in
Pension
Value
and NQDC
Earnings(4)
    All Other
Compensation(5)
    Total
Richard D. Fain
Chairman & Chief Executive Officer
 2021 $1,300,000 $11,250,070          $2,925,000        $156,971             $179,986 $15,812,027
 2020 $645,000 $11,171,146 $3,042,000  ($3,042,000) $154,879 $112,478 $12,083,503
 2019 $1,276,923 $8,699,024 $4,006,080    $189,347 $187,545 $14,358,919
Jason T. Liberty
EVP, Chief Financial Officer
 2021 $950,000 $10,500,003 $1,377,500    $88,519 $118,660 $13,034,682
 2020 $818,798 $3,228,563 $1,411,938    $89,503 $100,429 $5,649,231
 2019 $866,346 $2,621,510 $1,731,002    $91,472 $113,674 $5,424,004
Michael W. Bayley
President and CEO, RCI
 2021 $1,000,000 $14,999,980 $1,400,000    $18,969 $132,217 $17,551,166
 2020 $866,346 $4,943,887 $1,435,000    $74,355 $116,244 $7,435,832
 2019 $941,923 $4,061,696 $1,803,361    $110,190 $140,711 $7,057,881
Lisa Lutoff-Perlo
President and CEO, Celebrity Cruises
 2021 $820,000 $8,250,057 $1,066,000    $130,258 $151,810 $10,418,125
 2020 $710,558 $2,719,084 $1,092,650    $130,177 $96,854 $4,749,323
 2019 $770,769 $2,278,490 $1,098,258    $140,211 $142,114 $4,429,482
Harri U. Kulovaara
EVP, Maritime
 2021 $810,000 $1,499,964 $1,110,000    $83,691 $109,980 $3,613,635
 2020 $803,846 $1,483,167 $830,250    $81,764 $107,746 $3,606,773
 2019 $761,923 $1,139,243 $870,446    $98,382 $102,335 $3,422,329

Name and
Principal Position
  Year   Salary /
Fees
     Stock
Awards
(1)(2)
     Non-Equity
Incentive Plan
Compensation(3)
     Declined
Non-Equity
Incentive
Plan
Compensation
     Change in
Pension
Value
and NQDC
Earnings(4)
     All Other
Compensation(5)
     Total
Richard D. Fain(6)
Chairman & Former Chief
Executive Officer
2022$100,000 $200,006$300,006
2021$1,300,000$11,250,070            $2,925,000     $156,971               $179,986$15,812,027
2020$645,000$11,171,146$3,042,000($3,042,000)$154,879$112,478$12,083,504
Jason T. Liberty
President & Chief Executive
Officer and Former Chief
Financial Officer
2022$1,200,000$7,000,056$2,344,800$$219,402$10,764,258
2021$950,000$10,500,003$1,377,500$88,519$118,660$13,034,682
2020$818,798$3,228,563$1,411,938$89,503$100,429$5,649,231
 
Naftali Holtz (7)
Chief Financial Officer
2022$675,000$1,400,011$709,645$$33,396$2,818,052
 
Michael W. Bayley
President and CEO, RCI
2022$1,046,849$5,000,029$1,590,035$$128,847$7,765,760
2021$1,000,000$14,999,980$1,400,000$18,969$132,217$17,551,166
2020$866,346$4,943,887$1,435,000$74,355$116,244$7,435,832
Lisa Lutoff-Perlo
President and CEO,
Celebrity Cruises
2022$858,416$2,749,988$1,032,747$$115,514$4,756,665
2021$820,000$8,250,057$1,066,000$130,258$151,810$10,418,125
2020$710,558$2,719,084$1,092,650$130,177$96,854$4,749,323
Harri U. Kulovaara
EVP, Maritime
2022$847,948$1,500,001$1,151,632$$115,759$3,615,340
2021$810,000$1,499,964$1,110,000$83,691$109,980$3,613,635
2020$803,846$1,483,167$1,130,250$81,764$107,746$3,606,773
(1)The amounts in this column do not reflect (i) the dollar amount of long-term equity awards approved by the Talent and Compensation Committee as discussed on page 62, (ii) the compensation actually received by the NEO nor (iii) the actual value that will be recognized by the NEO. Instead the amounts reflect the aggregate grant date fair value of awards computed in accordance with FASB ASC Topic 718. With respect to the performance-based share awards, pursuant to the applicable FASB ASC Topic 718 rules, the “grant date” for accounting purposes will not be determined until the performance period has been completed because of the Talent and Compensation Committee’s ability to make adjustments to the payout levels. Consequently, the amount reported in this column represents the fair value of the award at the service inception date (i.e., the date the Talent and Compensation Committee authorized the award) based upon the then-probable outcome of the performance conditions. See Note 11 of the consolidated financial statements in the Company’s Annual Report for the year ended December 31, 2021,2022, regarding assumptions underlying the valuation of each of these types of awards.
(2)AmountsWith the exception of Mr. Fain (who received a stock award in 2022 solely in connection with our director compensation program), amounts for 20212022 include the grant date fair value of (1)both the 2021 Annual Equity Awards, both time-based awards and performance-based annual equity awards granted to each NEO in March 2021 and (2) the special equity awards, both time-based awards and performance-based awards, granted to Mr. Liberty, Mr. Bayley and Ms. Lutoff-Perlo in March 2021. For 2021, the aggregate grant date fair value of the performance-based awards was calculated based on the target performance level (the probable outcome of the performance conditions) as of the date the Talent and Compensation Committee authorized the award.February 2022. The values on the service inception date of the 2021 performance-based awards granted to the NEOs as part of the 2021 Annual Equity AwardsFebruary 2022 annual equity awards (assuming that the highest level of performance conditions will be achieved (i.e., 200%)) are the following: Mr. Fain - $16,875,062; Mr. Liberty - $4,199,933;$8,400,067; Mr. Holtz – $1,679,950; Mr. Bayley - $6,000,026;$6,000,002; Ms. Lutoff-Perlo - $3,300,057$3,300,049 and Mr. Kulovaara -$1,799,923. The value of the 2021 performance-based awards granted to the three NEOs as part of the special equity awards on the service inception date (assuming that the highest level of performance conditions will be achieved (i.e., 200%)) is the following: Mr. Liberty – $7,000,002; Mr. Bayley - $9,999,930; and Ms. Lutoff-Perlo - $5,500,038.$1,799,969.
(3)Represents amounts earned pursuant to the annual Executive Bonus Plan. We make payments under our annual Executive Bonus Plan in the first quarter following the fiscal year in which they were earned. In addition to the amounts earned under the Executive Bonus Plan, Mr. Kulovaara is entitled to receive a bonus of $150,000 per ship delivered during the year. During 2021,2022, RCG took delivery of three ships; however, based on the impact of the pandemic, the Talenttwo ships and Compensation Committee exercised negative discretion to reduce the aggregate amount to $300,000. Mr. Kulovaara received a ship delivery bonus of $300,000, in addition to the $851,632 he earned $810,000 under the Executive Bonus Plan for 2021. We make payments under our annual Executive Bonus Plan in the first quarter following the fiscal year in which they were earned.2022.

7066     
20222023 Proxy – Executive Compensation Tables


Table of Contents

Executive Compensation Tables

(4)Each of the NEOs, except for Mr. Fain, participated in the Royal Caribbean Cruises Ltd. Retirement Savings Plan as of December 31, 2021.2022. Prior to January 1, 2009, each of thecertain NEOs participated in the Royal Caribbean Cruises Ltd. SERP.Supplemental Executive Retirement Plan. In 2021, 2020 and 2019,2021, certain of the NEOs continued to maintain a balance in the SERP of amounts accrued prior to January 1, 2009. The aggregate above market earnings on these NEOs’ holdings in the SERP are listed under the column titled “Change in Pension Value Earnings.” The above market portion of earnings is calculated as the total earnings in the plan, less the earnings that would have been achieved under an annual growth rate equal to 120% of the applicable federal long-term rate at the end of each year.
(5)Please see the following table below titled “2021“2022 All Other Compensation” for an itemized disclosure of this element of compensation.
(6)Mr. Fain stepped down from his position as Chief Executive Officer, effective January 3, 2022. Although he did not receive any cash or equity compensation in 2022 for this role as Chief Executive Officer, he received compensation for services he provided during 2022 as our Chairman of the Board of Directors. The Salary/Fees and Stock Awards columns in the “Summary Compensation” table notes compensation received by Mr. Fain for his role as Chairman. As required by Regulation S-K, Item 402(c), these amounts are also reported separately in the “Director Compensation for 2022” table below.
(7)Mr. Holtz is an NEO for the first time in fiscal 2022.

20212022 All Other Compensation

  Perquisites  Benefits    
Name   Auto
Lease(1)
    Other
Perquisites(2)
    Life
Insurance
Policies
    Company
Contributions
to Qualified
Deferred
Compensation
Plans(3)
    Benefit
Payouts(4)
    Total 
Richard D. Fain    $11,436             $0        $38,550               $29,000      $101,000   $179,986 
Jason T. Liberty $18,216  $2,809  $2,636  $29,000  $66,000  $118,660 
Michael W. Bayley $14,400  $9,065  $8,752  $29,000  $71,000  $132,217 
Lisa Lutoff-Perlo $18,670  $43,275  $7,865  $29,000  $53,000  $151,810 
Harri U. Kulovaara $14,400  $0  $14,580  $29,000  $52,000  $109,980 

PerquisitesBenefits
NameAuto
Lease(1)
Other
Perquisites
Life
Insurance
Policies
Company
Contributions
to Qualified
Deferred
Compensation
Plans(3)
Benefit
Payouts(4)
Total
Jason T. Liberty$19,800   $77,108(2)   $2,975          $30,500   $89,019$219,402
Naftali Holtz$12,814   $   $395$9,150$11,037$33,396
Michael W. Bayley$14,400   $   $9,831$30,500$74,115$128,847
Lisa Lutoff-Perlo$20,750   $   $8,979$30,500$55,285$115,514
Harri U. Kulovaara$14,400        $        $16,621     $30,500     $54,238     $115,759
(1)These amounts include payments or allowance for auto lease, maintenance and repairs, registration and insurance.
(2)For 2021, these amountsOther perquisites include discounts on Company cruises, personal tax consulting servicesthe installation cost of a security system at Mr. Liberty’s residence ($62,555) and executive physicals. The valuethe periodic use of discounts on Company cruisesa car and driver for Ms. Lutoff-Perlo is $43,275.commuting purposes.
(3)Represents Company contributions to the Royal Caribbean Cruises Ltd. Retirement Savings Plan.
(4)Since January 1, 2009,Represents amounts payable to the NEOs for service in 2022 in lieu of contributions to the SERP, each NEO receives, on an annual basis, a lump sum cash payment of the benefitsamounts that would have been accrued undercontributed by the SERP for services in a given yearCompany to the Royal Caribbean Cruises Ltd. Supplemental Executive Retirement Plan but for the adoption of Section 457A of the Internal Revenue Code effective as of January 1, 2009. The amounts included in this column represent amounts payable to the NEOs for service in 2021, all of which are taxable as ordinary income.

20222023 Proxy – Executive Compensation Tables71     67


Table of Contents

Executive Compensation Tables

Grants of Plan Based Awards in 20212022

The following table provides information about cash (non-equity) and equity incentive compensation awarded to our NEOs in 2021,2022, including (1) the range of possible cash payouts under our annual Executive Bonus Plan; (2) the grant date of equity awards; (3) the number of time-based and performance-based restricted stock units granted; and (4) the grant date fair value of the time-based and performance-based equity grants calculated in accordance with FASB ASC Topic 718. The time-based and performance-based equity awards were granted under RCG’s 2008 Performance and Equity Incentive Plan, which is discussed in greater detail in this proxy statement under the caption “Compensation Discussion and Analysis.” As noted above, Mr. Fain stepped down from service as Chief Executive Officer on January 3, 2022 and did not receive any cash or equity incentive compensation during 2022 (other than for his service as Chairman of our Board of Directors in accordance with our director compensation program).

    Estimated Future Payouts Under
Non-Equity Incentive Plan Awards(1)
   Grant
Date
   Type of
Award
   



Estimated Future Payouts Under
Equity Incentive Plan Awards(3)
   All Other
Stock
Awards:
Number of
Shares of
Stocks or
Units
   Grant Date
Fair Value
of Stock
Awards
($)(4)
Name Threshold Target Maximum    Threshold Target Maximum   
Richard D. Fain 0 $2,925,000 $5,850,000               
         3/24/21 PSA(5) 0 99,464 198,928   $8,437,521
         3/24/21 RSU(6)       33,155 $2,812,539
Jason T. Liberty 0 $1,377,500 $2,755,000               
         3/24/21 PSU(5) 0 24,755 49,510   $2,099,967
         3/24/21 RSU(6)       16,504 $1.400,034
         3/24/21 PSU(7) 0 41,259 82,518   $3,500,001
         3/24/21 RSU(8)       41,259 $3,500,001
Michael W. Bayley 0 $1,400,000 $2,800,000               
         3/24/21 PSA(5) 0 35,365 70,730   $3,000,013
         3/24/21 RSU(6)       23,577 $2,000,037
         3/24/21 PSU(7) 0 58,941 117,882   $4,999,965
         3/24/21 RSU(8)       58,941 $4,999,965
Lisa Lutoff-Perlo 0 $1,066,000 $2,132,000               
         3/24/21 PSA(5) 0 19,451 38,902   $1,650,028
         3/24/21 RSU(6)       12,967 $1,099,991
         3/24/21 PSU(7) 0 32,418 64,836   $2,750,019
         3/24/21 RSU(8)       32,418 $2,750,019
Harri U. Kulovaara 0 $810,000 $1,620,000               
   $150,000(2)                 
         3/24/21 PSA(5) 0 10,609 21,218   $899,962
         3/24/21 RSU(6)       7,073 $600,003
Estimated Future Payouts Under
Non-Equity Incentive Plan Awards
(1)
Grant
Date
     Type of
Award
     

Estimated Future
Payouts Under Equity
Incentive Plan Awards(3)
All Other
Stock
Awards:
Number of
Shares of
Stocks or
Units
Grant Date
Fair Value
of Stock
Awards
($)(4)
Name     Threshold     Target     Maximum     Threshold     Target     Maximum     
Jason T.
Liberty
0$2,400,000$4,800,000     
2/7/22PSU(5)052,632105,264$4,200,034
2/7/22RSU(6)35,088$2,800,022
Naftali
Holtz
0$675,000$1,350,000
2/7/22PSU(5)010,52621,052$839,975
2/7/22RSU(6)7,018$560,036
Michael W.
Bayley
0$1,470,000$2,940,000
2/7/22PSA(5)037,59475,188$3,000,001
2/7/22RSU(6)25,063$2,000,027
Lisa Lutoff-
Perlo
0$1,119,300$2,238,600
2/7/22PSA(5)020,67741,354$1,650,025
2/7/22RSU(6)13,784$1,099,963
Harri U.
Kulovaara
0$850,500$1,701,000
$300,000(2)
2/7/22PSA(5)011,27822,556$899,984
2/7/22RSU(6)7,519$600,016
(1)These values represent the threshold, target and maximum payouts under the Executive Bonus Plan. As discussed above, payouts under our Executive Bonus Plan range from 0% to 200% based on the company-wide and, if applicable, brand-specific performance level achieved and, except in the case of Mr. Liberty, the individual performance level achieved. For 2021,additional details on the final payout for each NEO, refer to “2022 Executive Bonus Plan payout was equal to 100% of the target.Payouts” on page 56.
(2)In addition to the amounts that may be earned pursuant to the Executive Bonus Plan, Mr. Kulovaara is eligible to receive an incentive payment equal to $150,000 for each ship delivered during the year. There were two scheduled ship deliveries for 2022.
(3)These values represent the threshold, target and maximum number of shares that may be earned pursuant to the performance-based award for the relevant performance period. As discussed above, payout on the performance-based awards range from 0% to 200% based on the company-wide performance level achieved. For the annual performance-based awards and the Special Equity Awards,granted in 2022, the PSUs or PSAs will vest based on the achievement of EPS, ROIC, leverage, and leverage ratioan ESG composite for the relevantthree-year performance period.period ending December 31, 2024.
(4)With respect to time-based RSUs, the grant date fair value is calculated in accordance with FASB ASC Topic 718. With respect to the performance-based share awards, pursuant to the applicable FASB ASC Topic 718 rules, the “grant date” for accounting purposes will not be determined until the performance period has been completed because of the Talent and Compensation
72
2022 Proxy – Executive Compensation Tables

Table of Contents

Executive Compensation Tables

Committee’s ability to make adjustments to the payout levels. Consequently, the amount reported in this column represents the fair value of the award at the service inception date (i.e., the date the Talent and Compensation Committee authorized the award) based upon the then probable outcome of the performance conditions (i.e. target).
(5)Represents annual performance-based awards granted on March 24, 2021February 7, 2022, which will be earned based on RCG’s performance for the three-year period ending December 31, 2023.2024.
(6)Represents the annual time-based RSUs granted on March 24, 2021February 7, 2022, which will vest, or for which the transfer restrictions will lapse, in four equal annual installments.
(7)Represents the performance-based awards granted on March 24,2021 as part of the Special Equity Awards, which will vest based on RCG’s performance – 50% based on the two year-period ending December 31, 2022 and 50% based on the three-year period ending on December 31, 2023. The performance-based awards are not subject to the “Vesting into Retirement” policy. Please see the discussion under “Special Equity Awards” in the Compensation Discussion and Analysis on page 64 above for more information on the Special Equity Awards.
(8)Represents the time-based RSUs granted on March 24, 2021 as part of the Special Equity Awards which will vest 50% on the second anniversary of the grant date and 50% on the third anniversary of the grant date. The time-based RSUs are not subject to the “Vesting into Retirement” policy. Please see the discussion under “Special Equity Awards” in the Compensation Discussion and Analysis on page 64 above for more information on the Special Equity Awards.


68     
20222023 Proxy – Executive Compensation Tables
73


Table of Contents

Executive Compensation Tables

Employment Agreements

We have employment agreements with each of our NEOs. These agreements are intended to enhance the retention and motivation of these key employees and include provisions protecting the Company such as non-competition and non-solicitation clauses. The material terms of the employment agreements are summarized below and apply uniformly to all of our NEOs, except thatas otherwise noted below. Ms. Lutoff-Perlo’s agreement is with Celebrity Cruises Inc.

Pursuant to each employment agreement, each NEO is entitled to receive an annual base salary, which may be increased, but not decreased, at any time during the term at our sole discretion. Each NEO is also eligible to participate in and receive awards, in our discretion, pursuant to any cash incentive compensation programs and any equity or long-term incentive plans on terms available to similarly situated executives of the Company.

Each NEO’s employment can be terminated by us or by them at any time. IfFor NEOs other than Mr. Holtz, if we terminate a NEO’stheir employment without “cause” or if thesuch NEO resigns for “good reason” (as both terms are defined in the applicable employment agreement), he or she is entitled to (i) two times his or her then current base salary payable over the two year period following termination, and (ii) two times his or her “target” bonus under the annual Executive Bonus Plan for the year in which the termination of employment occurs, generally payable in accordance with our normal bonus payment practices, (iii)practices. With regard to Mr. Holtz, he is entitled to a payment equal to his current base salary payable over the one year period following termination. In addition, all NEOs are entitled to continued payment of health and medical benefits for a period of two years (one year for Mr. Holtz) commencing on the date of termination, or until such time that he or she commences employment with a new employer, whichever occurs first, and (iv) payment of reasonable professional search fees relating to outplacement. At our sole discretion, each NEO is also eligible to receive a one-time lump sum termination bonus to be paid two years after the date of termination in an amount not to exceed 50% of his or her base salary as of the date of termination. All of these payments are conditioned on the NEO executing a general release of claims for the benefit of the Company.

IfFor NEOs other than Mr. Holtz, if the NEO’s employment is terminated as a result of the NEO’s death or disability, the NEO, or his or her legal representative, is entitled to, within 60 days of the NEO’s death or disability (i) payment in a lump sum of compensation equal to two times his or her base salary in effect at the time of termination of employment, (ii) payment of the “target” bonus he or she would have been entitled to receive in each year during the two year period commencing on the date of termination under the annual Executive Bonus Plan and (iii) any death or disability benefit, as applicable, provided in accordance with the terms of the Company’s employee benefit plans then in effect. For Mr. Holtz, he or his legal representative will be entitled to receive payment of compensation equal to his base salary in effect at the time of termination, payment of accrued benefits, and any benefits provided in accordance with applicable plans then in effect.

If the NEO’s employment is terminated for cause, we have no obligation to provide severance payments, except for certain amounts that were earned and unpaid as of the date of termination or as required by law.

Any outstanding equity grants held by the NEO at the time of termination will be treated in the manner provided for in each equity grant. Please see further information regarding treatment of equity grants under the heading “Payment Upon Termination of Employment.”

Each NEO has agreed not to compete with the Company or its affiliates during the term of employment and for two yearsa fixed period of time following termination of employment and to refrain from (i) employing the Company’s or its affiliates’ employees during this period or (ii) soliciting employees, consultants, lenders, suppliers or customers from discontinuing, modifying or reducing the extent of their relationship with the Company during such period. During the term of the agreements and subsequent thereto, the NEOs have agreed not to disclose or use any confidential information. The non-compete period extends two years following termination of employment for each NEO other than Mr. Holtz, and one year following termination of employment for Mr. Holtz.

74
20222023 Proxy – Executive Compensation Tables     69


Table of Contents

Executive Compensation Tables

Outstanding Equity Awards at 20212022 Fiscal Year End

The following table provides information concerning unvested restricted stock units and performance share awards for each NEO outstanding as of the end of the fiscal year ended December 31, 2021.2022. Each restricted stock unit grantaward is shown separately for each NEO.

            Stock Awards     Equity Incentive Plan Awards
Name Equity
Award
Grant Date
 # of Shares or
Units of Stock
That Have
Not
Vested (#)
    Market value
of Shares or
Units of Stock
That Have
Not
Vested ($)(1)
 # of Unearned
Shares/Units or Other
Rights That Have
Not Vested (#)
     Market or
Payout
Value of
Unearned
Shares/Units
or Other
Rights that
Have
Not Vested
($)(1)
Richard D. Fain 2/13/2019                       111,154(4) 8,547,743
  2/20/2020      153,124(5) 11,775,236
  3/24/2021      198,928(6) 15,297,563
  3/24/2021 33,155(2) 2,549,620     
    33,155  2,549,620 463,206  35,620,542
Jason T. Liberty 2/13/2019      28,456(4) 2,188,266
  2/20/2020      38,110(5) 2,930,659
  3/24/2021      49,510(6) 3,807,319
  3/24/2021      82,518(7) 6,345,634
  9/27/2017 10,253(2) 788,456     
  2/13/2018 1,744(2) 134,114     
  2/13/2019 4,742(2) 364,660     
  2/20/2020 9,528(2) 732,703     
  3/24/2021 16,504(2) 1,269,158     
  3/24/2021 41,259(3) 3,172,817     
    84,030  6,461,907 198,594  15,271,879
Michael W. Bayley 2/13/2019      41,666(4) 3,204,115
  2/20/2020      54,444(5) 4,186,744
  3/24/2021      70,730(6) 5,439,137
  3/24/2021      117,882(7) 9,065,126
  9/27/2017 10,253(2) 788,456     
  3/24/2021 23,577(2) 1,813,071     
  3/24/2021 58,941(3) 4,532,563     
    92,771(2) 7,134,090 284,722  21,895,122
Lisa Lutoff-Perlo 2/13/2019      23,374(4) 1,797,461
  2/20/2020      29,944(5) 2,302,694
  3/24/2021      38,902(6) 2,991,564
  3/24/2021      64,836(7) 4,985,888
  9/27/2017 6,835(2) 525,612     
  3/24/2021 12,967(2) 997,162     
  3/24/2021 32,418(3) 2,492,944     
    52,220(2) 4,015,718 157,056  12,077,606
Harri U. Kulovaara 2/13/2019      11,686(4) 898,653
  2/20/2020      16,334(5) 1,256,085
  3/24/2021      21,218(6) 1,631,664
  9/27/2017 3,417(2) 262,767     
  9/5/2018 5,381(2) 413,799     
  3/24/2021 7,073(2) 543,914     
    15,871(2) 1,220,480 49,238  3,786,402
             
Stock Awards
Equity Incentive Plan Awards
NameEquity
Award
Grant Date
     # of Shares or
Units of Stock
That Have
Not Vested
(#)
      Market value
of Shares or
Units of Stock
That Have
Not Vested
($)(1)
     # of Unearned
Shares/Units or
Other Rights
That Have
Not Vested
(#)
     Market or
Payout
Value of
Unearned
Shares/Units or
Other Rights
that Have
Not Vested
($)(1)
Richard D. Fain2/20/2020         153,124(4) 7,568,919
3/24/2021198,928(5) 9,833,011
352,05217,401,930
Jason T. Liberty2/20/202038,110(4) 1,883,777
3/24/202149,510(5) 2,447,279
3/24/202182,518(6) 4,078,865
2/7/2022105,264(7) 5,203,200
2/13/20192,371(2) 117,199
2/20/20206,352(2) 313,979
3/24/202112,378(2)611,845
3/24/202141,259(3) 2,039,432
2/07/202235,088(2) 1,734,400
97,4484,816,855275,40213,613,121
Naftali Holtz2/20/20206,752(4) 333,751
3/24/20219,194(5) 454,459
2/7/202221,052(7) 1,040,600
2/20/20201,124(2) 55,559
3/24/20212,298(2)113,590
2/7/20227,018(2) 346,900
10,440516,04936,9981,828,811
Michael W. Bayley2/20/202054,444(4) 2,691,167
3/24/202170,730(5) 3,496,184
3/24/2021117,882(6)5,826,907
2/7/202275,188(7) 3,716,543
3/24/202158,941(3) 2,913,454
2/7/202225,063(2) 1,238,864
84,0044,152,318318,24415,730,801
Lisa Lutoff-Perlo2/20/202029,944(4) 1,480,132
3/24/202138,902(5) 1,922,926
3/24/202164,836(6) 3,204,843
2/7/202241,354(7) 2,044,128
3/24/202132,418(3) 1,602,422
2/7/202213,784(2) 681,343
46,2022,283,765175,0368,652,029

70     
20222023 Proxy – Executive Compensation Tables
75


Table of Contents

Executive Compensation Tables

Stock AwardsEquity Incentive Plan Awards
Name     Equity
Award
Grant Date
     # of Shares or 
Units of Stock 
That Have 
Not Vested 
(#) 
     Market value
of Shares or
Units of Stock
That Have
Not Vested
($)(1)
  # of Unearned 
Shares/Units or 
Other Rights 
That Have 
Not Vested 
(#) 
     Market or
Payout
Value of
Unearned
Shares/
Units or
Other Rights
that Have
Not Vested
($)(1)
Harri U. Kulovaara2/20/2020             16,334(4) 807,390
3/24/202121,218(5) 1,048,806
2/7/202222,556(7) 1,114,943
9/5/2018             3,311(2) 163,663
2/7/20227,519(2) 371,664
10,830535,32760,1082,971,138
(1)Calculated based on the closing stock price of $76.90$49.43 of the Company’s common stock on December 31,2021.31, 2022.
(2)Outstanding time-based RSUs vest in accordance with the following schedule: remaining time-based RSUs granted in 2017 will fully vest on September 27, 2022; RSUs granted in September 5, 2018 will fully vest on September 5, 2023; remaining time-based RSUs granted in 2018 will fully vest2019 vested on the anniversary of the award date in 2022; remaining time-based RSUs granted in 2019 will vest in equal installments on the anniversary of the award date in 2022 andFebruary 13, 2023; remaining time-based RSUs granted in 2020 will vest in equal installments on the anniversary of the award date in 2022, 2023 and 2024; and remaining time-based RSUs granted in 2021 will vest in equal installments on the anniversary of the award date in 2022, 2023, 2024 and 2025.2025; and remaining time-based RSUs granted in 2022 will vest in equal installments on the anniversary of the award date in 2023, 2024, 2025 and 2026. Time-based RSUs awarded to NEOs eligible under the “Vesting into Retirement” policy vest on the later of the first anniversary of the grant date and the first anniversary of the date the officer meets both the age and service criteria; however, these awards remain subject to restrictions on transfer that lapse over the same four-year period during which the RSUs otherwise would have been scheduled to vest.
(3)Represents the time-based RSUs granted as part of the Special Equity Awards which will vest 50% on the second anniversary of the grant date and 50% on the third anniversary of the grant date.
(4)Represents the annual 2019-2021 PSU Awards for the three-year period ended December 31, 2021 that vested on February 7, 2022, when the Talent and Compensation Committee set the actual payout level for purposes of such grant. Reflects the maximum number of PSUs/PSAs that may be earned. The 2019-2021 PSUs awards were earned at 90%.
(5)Represents the annual 2020-2022 PSU Awards for the three-year period ending December 31, 2022 that to the extent earned, will vestvested on the date in 2023 that the Talent and Compensation Committee sets the actual payout level for purposes of such grant.February 20, 2023. Reflects the maximum number of PSUs/PSAs that may be earned. The 2020-2022 PSU awards were earned at 35%.
(5)
(6)Represents the annual 2021-2023 PSU Awards for the three-year period ending December 31, 2023 that, to the extent earned, will vest on the date in 2024 that the Talent and Compensation Committee sets the actual payout level for purposes of such grant. Reflects the maximum number of PSUs/PSAs that may be earned.
(6)
(7)Represents the PSUs granted as part of the Special Equity Awards, which will be earned based on RCG’s performance – 50% based on the two-year period ending December 31, 2022 and 50% based on the three-year period ending on December 31, 2023. The PSUs will vest on the dates in 2023 and 2024, respectively, that the Talent and Compensation Committee sets the actual payout level for purposes of such grant. Reflects the maximum number of PSUs that may be earned. These awards are not subject to the “Vesting into Retirement” policy.
(7)Represents the annual 2022-2024 PSU Awards for the three-year period ending December 31, 2024 that, to the extent earned, will vest on the date in 2025 that the Talent and Compensation Committee sets the actual payout level for purposes of such grant. Reflects the maximum number of PSUs/PSAs that may be earned.

76
20222023 Proxy –  Executive Compensation Tables     71


Table of Contents

Executive Compensation Tables

Option Exercises and Stock Vested in 20212022

The following table provides information for the NEOs on stock option exercises and the time-based RSUs and performance-based awards that vested during 2021,2022, including the number of shares acquired upon exercise or vesting and the value realized, before payment of any applicable withholding tax and broker commissions.

 Option Awards     Stock Awards(3)Option AwardsStock Awards(1)
Name    Number
of Shares
Acquired on
Exercise
     Value
Realized on
Exercise(1)
 Number
of Shares
Acquired on
Vesting(4)
     Value
Realized
on Vesting(5)
      Number
of Shares
Acquired on
Exercise
     Value
Realized on
Exercise
  Number
of Shares
Acquired on
Vesting(2)
     Value
Realized on
Vesting(3)
Richard D. Fain  37,513(2)  1,065,369(2)  70,306  $5,792,684 83,175    $6,511,127
Jason T. Liberty        26,063  $2,149,665 34,476$2,433,429
Naftali Holtz12,472$746,458
Michael W. Bayley        58,291(6) $4,649,736 52,580$3,762,126
Lisa Lutoff-Perlo        22,628  $1,889,699 30,321$2,140,930
Harri U. Kulovaara        13,761  $1,141,015 17,819$1,200,837
(1)The value realized on exercise is calculated by multiplying the number of shares times the difference between the average of the high and low sales price of the Company’s common stock on the date of exercise and the per share exercise price of the options.
(2)We withheld 26,999 shares to cover the exercise price and tax withholding obligations. Mr. Fain received net shares of 10,514 upon his exercise.
(3)These columns reflect RSUs, PSUs, and PSAs previously awarded to the named executive officers that vested during 2021.2022. For those executives eligible to participate in the “Vesting into Retirement” policy on the grant date, the time-based RSUs and the PSAs vest on the first anniversary of the grant date; however, the restrictions on transfer or sale of the time-based RSUs only lapse on the first through fourth anniversary dates of the grant date, while the PSAs are only earned at the same time as the PSUs at the end of the relevant performance period when the Talent and Compensation Committee approve the payout level. For those that become eligible to participate in the “Vesting into Retirement” policy between the grant date and the vesting date, the time-based RSUs and the PSUs vest on the later of (i) the first anniversary of the grant date and (ii) the first anniversary of the date the officer meets both the age and service criteria; however, these awards remain subject to the same restrictions on transfer and the same criteria for being earned.
(2)
(4)Of these amounts, shares were withheld by us to cover tax withholding obligations as follows: Mr. Fain -27,664- 31,035 shares; Mr. Liberty - 8,892– 11,938 shares; Mr. Holtz – 4,075; Mr. Bayley - 21,276– 19,044 shares; Ms. Lutoff-Perlo - 7,402– 10,380 shares; and Mr. Kulovaara - 4,594– 6,248 shares.
(3)
(5)Calculated based on the average of the high and low sales price of the Company’s common stock on the applicable vesting dates.
(6)Because the first anniversary of when Mr. Bayley met both the age and service criteria of the “Vesting into Retirement” policy occurred in 2021, all of Mr. Bayley’s outstanding time-based RSUs and PSUs immediately vested. However, these awards remain subject to restrictions on transfer and to the same criteria for being earned.

72     
20222023 Proxy – Executive Compensation Tables
77


Table of Contents

Executive Compensation Tables

Payments Upon Termination of Employment

The following table represents payments and benefits to which the NEOs would be entitled upon termination of their employment in accordance with their employment agreements and our equity plans and agreements. Termination of employment is assumed to occur, for purposes of this table, on December 31, 2021. The table does not include amounts a NEO would be entitled to receive without regard to the circumstances of termination, such as vested equity awards or accrued retirement benefits (if retirement eligible) and deferred compensation. Please see the “Outstanding Equity Awards at 2021 Fiscal Year-End” table for more information. In most cases, entitlements2022. Entitlements upon termination of employment are governed by the NEOs’ employment agreements with the Company, which are described under the heading “Employment Agreements.” In addition, the treatment of outstanding equity awards, which are unvested as of the time of termination, are treated in accordance with the agreement and plan applicable to the particular award, as described below. We do not provide any cash payments in the event of a change of control absent an employment termination nor do we increase the amount of cash severance that would be due to a NEO in the event of his or her termination of employment in connection with a change of control.

    Termination Type
Name     Benefit     Death or
Disability
       Termination
w/o Cause or
for Good
Reason
       “Change of
Control
Termination”
 
Richard D. Fain Severance Payment $2,600,000       $2,600,000      $2,600,000 
  Settlement of Outstanding Annual Bonus Award $5,850,000  $5,850,000  $5,850,000 
  Settlement of Outstanding Equity Awards(1) $20,359,890     $20,359,890 
  Medical and Dental Benefits Continuation    $19,191  $19,191 
  Outplacement Services    $25,000  $25,000 
  Total $28,809,890  $8,494,191  $28,854,081 
Jason T. Liberty Severance Payment $1,900,000  $1,900,000  $1,900,000 
  Settlement of Outstanding Annual Bonus Award $2,755,000  $2,755,000  $2,755,000 
  Settlement of Outstanding Equity Awards(1) $14,097,846     $14,097,846 
  Medical and Dental Benefits Continuation    $27,308  $27,308 
  Outplacement Services    $25,000  $25,000 
  Total $18,752,846  $4,707,308  $18,805,154 
Michael W. Bayley Severance Payment $2,000,000  $2,000,000  $2,000,000 
  Settlement of Outstanding Annual Bonus Award $2,800,000  $2,800,000  $2,800,000 
  Settlement of Outstanding Equity Awards(1) $18,081,651     $18,081,651 
  Medical and Dental Benefits Continuation    $16,943  $16,943 
  Outplacement Services    $25,000  $25,000 
  Total $22,881,651  $4,841,943  $22,923,594 
Lisa Lutoff-Perlo Severance Payment $1,640,000  $1,640,000  $1,640,000 
  Settlement of Outstanding Annual Bonus Award $2,132,000  $2,132,000  $2,132,000 
  Settlement of Outstanding Equity Awards(1) $10,054,521     $10,054,521 
  Medical and Dental Benefits Continuation    $19,539  $19,539 
  Outplacement Services    $25,000  $25,000 
  Total $13,826,521  $3,816,539  $13,871,060 
Harri U. Kulovaara Severance Payment $1,620,000  $1,620,000  $1,620,000 
  Settlement of Outstanding Annual Bonus Award $1,620,000  $1,620,000  $1,620,000 
  Settlement of Outstanding Equity Awards(1) $3,113,681     $3,113,681 
  Medical and Dental Benefits Continuation    $19,191  $19,191 
  Outplacement Services    $25,000  $25,000 
  Total $6,353,681  $3,284,191  $6,397,872 
               

The table does not include amounts a NEO would be entitled to receive without regard to the circumstances of termination, such as accrued vested equity awards or accrued retirement benefits (if retirement eligible) and deferred compensation. Please see the “Outstanding Equity Awards at 2022 Fiscal Year-End” table for more information.

Termination Type
Name(1)     Benefit     Death or
Disability
     Termination
w/o Cause or
for Good
Reason
     “Change of
Control
Termination”
Jason T. LibertySeverance Payment $2,400,000      $2,400,000    $2,400,000
Settlement of Outstanding Annual Bonus Award$4,800,000$4,800,000$4,800,000
Settlement of Outstanding Equity Awards(2)$11,623,415$11,623,415
Medical and Dental Benefits Continuation$27,174$27,174
Outplacement Services$25,000$25,000
Total$18,823,415$7,252,174$18,875,589
Naftali HoltzSeverance Payment$$675,000$675,000
Settlement of Outstanding Annual Bonus Award$$$
Settlement of Outstanding Equity Awards(2)$1,430,455$1,430,455
Medical and Dental Benefits Continuation$13,587$13,587
Outplacement Services$25,000$25,000
Total$1,430,455$713,587$2,144,042
Michael W. BayleySeverance Payment$2,100,000$2,100,000$2,100,000
Settlement of Outstanding Annual Bonus Award$2,940,000$2,940,000$2,940,000
Settlement of Outstanding Equity Awards(2)$12,017,718$12,017,718
Medical and Dental Benefits Continuation$16,810$16,810
Outplacement Services$25,000$25,000
Total$17,057,718$5,081,810$17,099,528
Lisa Lutoff-PerloSeverance Payment$1,722,000$1,722,000$1,722,000
Settlement of Outstanding Annual Bonus Award$2,238,600$2,238,600$2,238,600
Settlement of Outstanding Equity Awards(2)$6,609,780$6,609,780
Medical and Dental Benefits Continuation$19,461$19,461
Outplacement Services$25,000$25,000
Total$10,570,380$4,005,061$10,614,840
Harri U. KulovaaraSeverance Payment$1,701,000$1,701,000$1,701,000
Settlement of Outstanding Annual Bonus Award$1,701,000$1,701,000$1,701,000
Settlement of Outstanding Equity Awards(2)$2,020,896$2,020,896
Medical and Dental Benefits Continuation$19,191$19,191
Outplacement Services$25,000$25,000
Total$5,422,896$3,446,191$5,467,087
78(1)
Excludes Mr. Richard Fain, who stepped down from his role as CEO, effective January 3, 2022. Pursuant to his employment agreement with the Company, the only benefits payable upon his departure were accrued but unpaid benefits as of the date of termination of employment and settlement of outstanding equity grants as governed by the terms of the applicable award agreements.

20222023 Proxy – Executive Compensation Tables     73



Table of Contents

Executive Compensation Tables

(1)(2)The cost of Settlement of Outstanding Equity Awards, reflects the following based on the terms of the Plan and the relevant awards agreements:
upon a termination due to death or disability, (i) all unvested time-based RSUs will immediately vest and (ii) all unearned performance-based awards will be earned at target and, to the extent not yet vested, immediately vest; and
upon a termination of the executive’s employment by the Company without “cause” or by the executive for “good reason” within 12 months following a “change of control”, (i) all unvested time-based RSUs will immediately vest and (ii) all unearned performance-based awards will be earned based upon the Talent and Compensation Committee’s then best estimate of the shares that have been earned will be awardable at the end of the performance period, and, to the extent not yet vested, immediately vest. (For purposes of the table above, we assumed that the Company would meet target for each of the performance-based awards.)

Compensation Risk

In order to assess the risk inherent in the design of our compensation plans, policies and programs, management regularly undertakes a comprehensive inventory of all plans and programs. In accordance with screening methodology approved by the Talent and Compensation Committee, in late 2021,2022, management reviewed each plan and program for risk features and presented its findings to the Talent and Compensation Committee. Based on this review, management and the Talent and Compensation Committee believe that the nature of our business, and the material risks we face, are such that the compensation plans, policies and programs we have put in place are not reasonably likely to give rise to risks that would have a material adverse effect on our business. We believe our compensation programs and decisions include qualitative factors which restrain the influence that an overly formulaic approach may have on excessive risk taking by management.

74
20222023 Proxy – Executive Compensation Tables
79


Table of Contents

CEO Pay Ratio

In August 2015, pursuant to a mandate of the Dodd Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act, the SEC adopted a rule requiring annual disclosure of the ratio of the median employee’s annual total compensation to the total annual compensation of the Principal Executive Officer (“PEO”). The Company’s PEO is our former CEO, Richard Fain. The Company is presenting the required disclosure as follows:

We had approximately 85,00084,059 active employees as of December 31, 2021. The2022. This amount excludes shipboard employees who were not assigned to any sailing during the year and thus did not receive any compensation.

We calculated median employee’sgross wages for our employee population and identified our median employee. We did not annualize the pay for our employees when identifying our median. We determined that this person was a crew member whose total compensation for 2021,2022, calculated consistent with Item 402(c) of Regulation S-K, was $14,706.$15,264. This figure includes gratuities directly billed to our guests but excludes any cash gratuities paid directly to the employee by guests. It also excludes room and board, which is provided to our crew members without charge. Based upon this methodology and the CEO’s total compensation, as set forth in the Summary Compensation Table, we estimate the ratio of our CEO’s pay to the median employee’s pay is 1,075705 to 1.


80
20222023 Proxy – CEO Pay Ratio     75


Table of Contents

Pay Versus Performance

As required by Section 953(a) of the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act and Item 402(v) of Regulation S-K, we are providing the following information about the relationship between executive compensation actually paid and the Company’s financial performance.

Tabular Disclosure of Compensation Actually Paid versus Performance

The following table discloses information on “compensation actually paid” (CAP) to our principal executive officer (PEO) and (on average) to our other NEOs (non-PEO NEOs) during the specified years alongside total shareholder return (TSR) and net income metrics, as well as a Company-selected measure of Adjusted EPS. The Company selected this measure as the most important in linking compensation actually paid to our NEOs for 2022 to Company performance, as Adjusted EPS was the predominant metric used in evaluating company-wide performance under our Executive Bonus Plan (60%) and comprised 30% of target long-term incentive awards granted to our NEOs in 2022 for the performance period ending December 2025, as described in more detail in the “Compensation Discussion and Analysis” beginning on page 45.

                               
Year SCT Total for
Former PEO
(1)
 Compensation
Actually Paid
to Former
PEO(3)
  SCT Total
Compensation
for PEO(2)
 Compensation
Actually Paid to
Mr. Liberty(3)
 Average
SCT Total
Compensation
for Other NEOs(4)
 Average
Compensation
Actually Paid
to Other NEOs(3)
 Company
TSR(5)
 Dow Jones
U.S. Travel
& Leisure
Index(5)
 Net
Income
($M)(6)
  Adjusted
EPS(7)
 
2022    $300,006    ($4,371,814)    $10,764,258        $3,846,340        $4,738,954        $1,390,884     $37.39      $116.17($2,156)($6.82)
2021$15,812,027$15,310,661$11,154,402$10,506,637$58.17$127.35  ($5,261)  ($19.19)
2020$12,083,504($462,571)$5,360,290$498,183$56.50$101.09($5,798)($18.31)
(1)Reflects the total compensation for our former PEO, Mr. Richard Fain, who served as PEO until January 3, 2022, and is therefore included in this table as an additional PEO in accordance with SEC rules. Amounts shown are calculated in the Summary Compensation Table (SCT) for each of the years shown (and for Mr. Fain, solely reflect compensation for his service as our Chairman of the Board of Directors, since he received no additional compensation for his service as PEO in 2022.)
(2)Reflects total compensation of our current CEO, Mr. Jason Liberty, as calculated in the Summary Compensation Table (SCT).
(3)The dollar amounts shown in these columns reflect “compensation actually paid” to the NEOs calculated in accordance with SEC rules. As required, the dollar amounts include (among other items) unpaid amounts of equity compensation that may be realizable in future periods, and as such, the dollar amounts shown do not fully represent the actual final amount of compensation earned or actually paid to either individual during the applicable years. The adjustments made to each officer’s total compensation for each year to determine CAP are shown in the tables below. For Mr. Liberty, information is only included with respect to 2022, the first year in which he served as CEO.

76     2023 Proxy – Pay Versus Performance


Table of Contents

Pay Versus Performance

202220212020
     Richard D.
Fain
     Jason T.
Liberty
     Other NEOs     Richard D.
Fain
     Other NEOs     Richard D.
Fain
     Other NEOs
Total Reported in 2022
Summary Compensation
Table (SCT)
$300,006$10,764,258$4,738,954$15,812,027$11,154,402$12,083,504$5,360,290
Deduct Change in Pension
Value and NQDC Earnings
Reported in SCT
$(156,971)$(80,359)$(154,879)$(93,950)
Add Service Cost and Prior
Service Cost
Deduct Value of Stock
Awards Reported
in SCT
$(200,006)$(7,000,056)$(2,662,507)$(11,250,070)$(8,812,501)$(11,171,146)$(3,093,676)
Add Year-End Fair Value of
Awards Granted in Fiscal
Year that are Outstanding
and Unvested
$4,336,000$1,649,220$10,198,401$7,988,699$7,624,579$2,160,278
Add Change in Fair Value of
Prior Year Awards that are
Outstanding and Unvested
$(4,835,434)$(4,049,875)(2,150,970)$292,027$96,223$(5,771,819)$(2,576,592)
Add Fair Value of Awards
Granted in Fiscal Year that
Vested in the Same
Fiscal Year
$111,514
Add Change in Fair Value
of Prior Year Awards that
Vested in Year
$252,107$(203,987)$(183,813)$415,247$160,173$(3,072,810)$(1,258,168)
Deduct Prior Year Fair Value
of Prior Year Awards that
Failed to Vest this Year
Total Adjustments$(4,671,820)$(6,917,918)$(3,348,070)$(501,366)$(647,765)$(12,546,075)$(4,862,107)
Compensation Actually
Paid for Fiscal Year
$(4,371,814)$3,846,3401,390,88415,310,661$10,506,637$(462,571)$498,183
(4)Reflects the average total compensation of our non-PEO NEOs, as calculated in the SCT for each of the years shown. Our non- PEO NEOs included in the table above are the following individuals: for 2022: Naftali Holtz, Michael Bayley, Lisa Lutoff-Perlo, and Harri U. Kulovaara; for 2021: Jason Liberty, Michael W. Bayley, Lisa Lutoff-Perlo and Harri U. Kulovaara; and for 2020: Jason Liberty, Michael W. Bayley, Lisa Lutoff-Perlo and Harri U. Kulovaara.
(5)
Pursuant to SEC rules, the TSR figures assume an initial investment of $100 on December 31, 2019. As permitted by SEC rules, the peer group referenced for purpose of the TSR comparison is the group of companies included in the Dow Jones U.S. Travel and Leisure Index, which is the industry peer group used for purposes of Item 201(e) of Regulation S-K. The separate peer group used by the Talent and Compensation Committee for purposes of determining compensation paid to our executive officers is described on page 63.
(6)Reflects after-tax net income (loss) attributable to shareholders prepared in accordance with GAAP for each of the years shown.
(7)
Adjusted Earnings (Loss) per Share is a non-GAAP financial measure that represents net income (loss) excluding certain items that we believe adjusting for is meaningful when assessing our performance on a comparative basis. For the 2022 periods presented, these items included (i) gain or loss on the extinguishment of debt; (ii) the amortization of non-cash debt discount on our convertible notes; (iii) the estimated cash refunds expected to be paid to Pullmantur guests as part of the Pullmantur S.A. reorganization in 2020; (iv) impairment and credit losses; (v) equity investment asset impairments; (vi) net insurance recoveries related to the collapse of the drydock structure at the Grand Bahama Shipyard involving Oasis of the Seas; (vii) restructuring charges and other initiative expenses; (viii) the amortization of the Silversea Cruises intangible assets resulting from the Silversea Cruises acquisition in 2018; (ix) the net gain recognized in 2021 in relation to the sale of the Azamara brand; (x) the net loss recognized in the fourth quarter of 2021 related to the elimination of the three-month reporting lag for Silversea Cruises; and (xi) the estimated amounts that may be payable in relation to the ongoing Havana Docks litigation. In addition, for purposes of determining payouts in 2022 under the Executive Bonus Plan and performance-based awards, the Talent and Compensation Committee also accounted for variances in fuel prices, interest rates, and foreign exchange rates from the Company’s forecast when setting targets, net of hedging impacts. Refer to “Compensation Discussion and Analysis,” beginning on page 45.

2023 Proxy – Pay Versus Performance     77


Table of Contents

Pay Versus Performance

Tabular Disclosure of Most Important Measures Linking Compensation Actually Paid During 2022 to Company Performance

As required, we disclose below the most important measures (unranked) used by the Company to link compensation actually paid to our NEOs for 2022 to Company performance. For further information regarding these performance metrics and their function in our executive compensation program, please see “Compensation Discussion and Analysis” beginning on page 45.

ROIC
Leverage
Liquidity
Adjusted Gross Margin
ESG Composite Index

Disclosure of the Relationship Between Compensation Actually Paid and Financial Performance Measures

The below graphical illustrations demonstrate the relationship between compensation actually paid to the NEOs over the last three fiscal years as compared to TSR, Net Income, and Adjusted EPS over the last three fiscal years. Generally, compensation actually paid (for both the PEO(s) and NEOs) since fiscal 2020 has increased or decreased as each of TSR, Net Income, and Adjusted EPS has increased or decreased, respectively. However, the compensation in fiscal 2021 for the PEOs does not align with that trend as Mr. Liberty, Mr. Bayley, and Ms. Lutoff-Perlo received special retention equity grants as described of page 60 of the “Compensation Discussion and Analysis.” In accordance with Item 402(v) of Regulation S-K, the Company is providing the following descriptions (shown graphically) of the relationships between information presented in the Pay versus Performance table.

PEO & Average NEO CAP vs Net Income,
Fiscal 2020 - 2022


78     2023 Proxy – Pay Versus Performance


Table of Contents

Pay Versus Performance

PEO & Average NEO CAP vs Comparator Group TSR,
Fiscal 2020 - 2022

PEO & Average NEO CAP vs Adjusted EPS,
Fiscal 2020 - 2022

2023 Proxy – Pay Versus Performance     79


Table of Contents

Director Compensation for 20212022

Director Compensation for 2021

We pay annual cash retainers of $100,000 to our directors for their service on the Board. We also pay annual cash retainers for chairing and service on various Board committees. The amount of these retainers in 20212022 for a full year of service was as follows:

Committee Role     Audit
Committee
      Talent &
Compensation
Committee
      Nominating &
Corporate
Governance
Committee
      Safety,
Environment,
Sustainability &
Health
Committee
      Audit
Committee
     Talent &
Compensation
Committee
     Nominating & Corporate
Governance Committee
     Safety, Environment,
Sustainability &
Health Committee
Chairman       $35,000              $25,500          $20,000             $20,000 $35,000$25,000$20,000$20,000
Member $20,000  $12,000  $10,000  $10,000 $20,000$12,000$10,000$10,000

Directors do not earn fees for each meeting attended; however, they are reimbursed for their travel expenses and, occasionally, for those of an accompanying guest. In addition, our Lead Director received a further annual cash retainer of $75,000 for 2021.2022. Directors who are also Company employees do not receive any compensation for their services as directors.

In February 2021,2022, each non-employee director received restricted stock units with a fair market value of $200,029$200,006 as of the grant date. These restricted stock units vested in full immediately upon grant and settled one year following the date of grant. Our stock ownership guidelines require directors to accumulate ownership of at least $300,000 of our common stock (which is 3three times their annual cash retainer for Board service), including the value of restricted stock and restricted stock units, within three years of becoming a director. If the value of their stock holdings falls below this amount, directors cannot sell shares of our common stock until the value once again exceeds the required amount. In addition, non- employeenon-employee directors may not be granted awards with a dollar value, in excess of $500,000 in any onewhich together with cash compensation paid to such director for such calendar year.year, would exceed $750,000.

In order to increase their knowledge and understanding of our business, we encourage our non-employee Board members and their families to experience our cruises. As a result, we have adopted a Non-Management Director Cruise Policy. Under this policy, with certain limited exceptions, a Board member is entitled to up to two complimentary staterooms on two cruises per year for the Board member and any immediate family accompanying the Board member on the cruise. Additional guests traveling with a Board member will receive a 15% discount off the lowest available fare for up to five staterooms. These benefits are provided at little or no incremental cost to the Company. The CEO may grant exceptions to this policy at his discretion but did not do so in 2021.2022.

80     2023 Proxy – Director Compensation for 2022


Table of Contents

Director Compensation for 2022

The table below summarizes the compensation of each person serving as a non-employee director in 2021.2022. Mr. Richard Fain was an NEO for 2022 as he served as our Chief Executive Officer until January 3, 2022. He did not receive compensation in 2022 for his role as Chief Executive Officer but received compensation for his service as Chairman of the Board of Directors, as set forth below and in the “Summary Compensation Table.”

Name Fees Earned
or Paid in
Cash
 Stock
Awards(1),(2)
 All Other
Compensation(3)
 Total     Fees
Earned
or Paid in
Cash
     Stock
Awards
(1)(2)
     All Other
Compensation
     Total
John F. Brock     $122,000     $200,029          $322,029  $122,000     $200,006$322,006
Richard D. Fain$100,000$200,006$300,006
Stephen R. Howe, Jr. $140,000 $200,029  $340,029$140,000$200,006$340,006
William L. Kimsey $220,000 $200,029  $420,029$220,000$200,006$420,006
Michael O. Leavitt(3)$97,471$200,006$297,477
Amy McPherson $110,233 $200,029 $17,996 $328,258$112,000$200,006$312,006
Maritza G. Montiel $120,000 $200,029   $320,029$120,000$200,006$320,006
Ann S. Moore $112,000 $200,029  $312,029$112,000$200,006$312,006
Eyal M. Ofer $120,000 $200,029  $320,029$120,000$200,006$320,006
William K. Reilly $120,000 $200,029 $48,446 $368,475
William K. Reilly(4)$120,000$200,006$320,006
Vagn O. Sørensen $145,500 $200,029  $345,529$145,000$200,006$345,006
Donald Thompson $122,000 $200,029  $322,029$122,000$200,006$322,006
Arne Alexander Wilhelmsen $120,000 $200,029  $320,029$120,000$200,006$320,006
(1)The column titled “Stock Awards” reports the fair value of restricted stock unit awards at their grant date in 20212022 calculated in accordance with the provisions of Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) Accounting Standards Codification (“ASC”) Topic 718. For the assumptions used in valuing these awards for purposes of computing this expense, please see Note 11 of the consolidated financial statements in the Company’s Annual Report for the year ended December 31, 2021.2022.
(2)As of December 31, 2021,2022, each non-employee director listed in the table held 2,3582,256 vested restricted stock units that are issuable one year following the grant date.
(3)Mr. Leavitt was appointed to the Board of Directors on February 10, 2022 and received a prorated cash retainer.
(3)(4)These amounts relate to discounts on Company cruises provided to directors.
Mr. Reilly retired from the Board of Directors, effective January 26, 2023.

20222023 Proxy – Director Compensation for 2021202281


Table of Contents

Audit Committee MattersProposal 3

                                              

PROPOSAL 3

Advisory Vote on Frequency of Shareholder Vote on Executive Compensation

The board recommends a vote for the option of “ONE YEAR.”

Applicable SEC rules require that, at least once every six years, shareholders be given the opportunity to vote on an advisory basis regarding the frequency (i.e., annually, every two years or every three years) of future shareholder advisory “say-on-pay” votes on the compensation of our named executive officers.

Our shareholders voted on a similar proposal in 2011 and 2017. In 2011, the majority of our shareholders voted to hold the say-on-pay vote once every three years. Notwithstanding this, the Talent and Compensation Committee adopted an annual vote as it believed such practice was in accord with best market practices and, more importantly, allowed shareholders to provide valuable input on our compensation philosophy, policies and practices. In 2017, the majority of shareholders voted in favor of holding such a vote annually.

We continue to believe that say-on-pay votes should be conducted every year so that our shareholders may annually express their views on our executive compensation program.

As an advisory vote, this proposal is not binding on the Company, our Board, or the Talent and Compensation Committee. However, the Talent and Compensation Committee and the Board value the opinions expressed by shareholders in their votes on this proposal and will consider the outcome of the vote when making future decisions regarding the frequency of conducting a say-on-pay vote.

Shareholders may cast their advisory vote to conduct advisory votes on executive compensation every “One Year,” “Two Years,” or “Three Years,” or may “Abstain.”

Board Recommendation

The Board unanimously recommends that shareholders vote for the option of “ONE YEAR” as the frequency of future advisory votes on executive compensation.


82     2023 Proxy – Proposal 3


Table of Contents

Proposal 4

PROPOSAL 4

Ratification of Principal Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm


The board recommends a vote “FOR” this proposal.

 

The Audit Committee has appointed PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP as our principal independent auditor for the fiscal year ending December 31, 2022.2023. PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP has served in this capacity since at least 1989. A representative of PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP is expected to be present at the Annual Meeting to respond to questions from the shareholders and to make a statement if the representative desires to do so.

Although ratification by the shareholders of the appointment of our principal independent auditor is not required, the Board is submitting the selection of PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP for ratification because the Board values the views of our shareholders on the selection and believes doing so is consistent with good corporate governance. If the shareholders do not approve this proposal, the Audit Committee will re-evaluate its selection, taking into consideration the shareholder vote. However, the Audit Committee is solely responsible for selecting and terminating our independent registered public accounting firm and may do so at any time at its discretion.

The Board unanimously recommends a vote “FOR” ratification of the selection of PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP as our principal independent auditor for the 20222023 fiscal year.


2023 Proxy – Proposal 4     83


Table of Contents

Audit Fees

Audit Fees

Aggregate fees for professional services rendered by PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP for the fiscal years ended December 31, 2022, and 2021 and 2020 were:

     2021     2020      2022     2021
Audit fees(1)   $4,967,736    $5,718,226 $5,090,316$4,967,736
Audit-related fees(2) $193,375 $190,265 $212,889$193,375
Tax fees(3) $10,902 $14,616 $12,488$10,902
All other fees(4) $10,000 $10,000 $10,000$10,000
Total $5,182,013 $5,933,107 $5,325,693$5,182,013
(1)The audit fees for the fiscal years ended December 31, 20212022 and 20202021 were for professional services rendered for the integrated audits of the Company’s consolidated financial statements and system of internal control over financial reporting, quarterly reviews, statutory audits required by foreign jurisdictions, consents, issuance of comfort letters, and review of documents filed with the SEC.
(2)The audit-related fees for the fiscal years ended December 31, 20212022 and 20202021 were for the audits of the Company’s retirement savings plan and other attest services.
(3)Tax fees for the fiscal years ended December 31, 20212022 and 20202021 were for services performed in connection with international tax compliance, and transfer pricing.
(4)All other fees for the fiscal years ended December 31, 20212022 and 20202021 were for subscription fees for accounting and auditing research software.
82
2022 Proxy – Audit Committee Matters

Table of Contents

Audit Committee Matters

Pursuant to the terms of its charter, the Audit Committee approves all audit and audit related engagement fees and terms and all non-audit engagements with the principal independent auditor. The ChairmanChair of the Audit Committee also has the authority to approve any non-audit engagements with the independent registered public accounting firm but must report any such approvals to the Audit Committee at its next meeting. Our Audit Committee was not called upon in the fiscal year ended December 31, 2021,2022, to approve, after the fact, any non-audit, review or attest services pursuant to the pre-approval waiver provisions of the auditor independence rules of the SEC and the Audit Committee charter.

The Audit Committee has considered and determined that the services provided by PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP are compatible with maintaining PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP’s independence.

84     
20222023 Proxy – Audit Committee MattersFees
83


Table of Contents

Report of the Audit Committee

The Audit Committee is composed of four non-management directors, each of whom meets the independence and financial literacy requirements of the New York Stock Exchange and SEC rules. In addition, all four members qualify as “audit committee financial experts” as defined by the SEC.

The Audit Committee operates under a written charter adopted by the Board of Directors, which may be accessed on our website at www.rclinvestor.com. The Audit Committee reviews and assesses the adequacy of its charter on an annual basis. In accordance with the charter, the Audit Committee assists the Board of Directors in fulfilling its oversight responsibilities with respect to the quality and integrity of the Company’s financial statements; the qualifications, independence and performance of the Company’s principal independent auditor; the performance of the Company’s internal audit function; and the Company’s compliance with legal and regulatory requirements in connection with the foregoing.

It is the responsibility of the Company’s management to prepare the Company’s financial statements and to develop and maintain adequate systems of internal control over financial reporting. The internal auditor’s responsibility is to review and, when appropriate, audit the internal control over financial reporting. The Company’s principal independent auditor has the responsibility to express an opinion on the financial statements and internal control over financial reporting based on an audit conducted in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (the “PCAOB”).

As part of its oversight of the Company’s financial statements, the Audit Committee reviews and discusses with both management and the Company’s principal independent auditor all annual and quarterly financial statements prior to their issuance. During 2021,2022, management advised the Audit Committee that each set of financial statements reviewed had been prepared in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles, and management reviewed significant accounting and disclosure issues with the Audit Committee. These reviews included discussion with the principal independent auditor of matters required to be discussed by the applicable requirements of the PCAOB and the SEC, including the quality of the Company’s accounting principles, the reasonableness of significant judgments and the clarity of disclosures in the financial statements. The Audit Committee also discussed with the principal independent auditor matters relating to its independence, including the written disclosures and letter from the principal independent auditor to the Audit Committee required by applicable PCAOB requirements regarding the independent accountants’ communications with the Audit Committee concerning independence. The Audit Committee has also considered whether the provision of non-audit services is compatible with maintaining the independence of the principal independent auditor.

The Audit Committee also has reviewed and discussed with management, the internal auditor and the principal independent auditor the Company’s internal controls report and the auditor’s attestation of the report.

Based on the review and discussions referred to above, the Audit Committee recommended to the Board of Directors that the audited financial statements be included in the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2021,2022, for filing with the SEC.

THE AUDIT COMMITTEE

William L. Kimsey, Chairman
Chair
Stephen R. Howe, Jr.

Maritza G. Montiel


Vagn O. Sørensen

84
20222023 Proxy – Report of the Audit Committee     85


Table of Contents

PROPOSAL 4

Approval of Amended and Restated 2008 Equity Incentive Plan

The board recommends a vote “FOR” this proposal.

The Board believes that equity-based incentive compensation is essential to attracting, motivating and retaining employees, consultants and directors, and aligning their interests with those of our shareholders. We currently maintain the 2008 Equity Incentive Plan, as amended and restated (the “2008 Plan”), which is our only active equity award plan other than our employee stock purchase plan. The 2008 Plan was originally adopted by our Board of Directors on March 7, 2008 and approved by our shareholders on May 13, 2008. The 2008 Plan was subsequently amended and restated as of May 20, 2016 to, among other things, extend the term for an additional 10 years through May 19, 2026.

We are asking shareholders to approve another amendment and restatement of the 2008 Plan to, among other things, extend the term for an additional 10 years through April 11, 2032 and increase the number of shares of common stock reserved for issuance thereunder by 9.5 million shares. This amendment and restatement of the 2008 Plan (the “Amended Plan”) was recommended by our Talent and Compensation Committee and approved by our Board of Directors in March 2022. If approved by our shareholders, the Amended Plan will become effective as of the date of the Annual Meeting.

In addition to extending the term for an additional 10 years through April 11, 2032 and increasing the number of shares of common stock reserved for issuance, in the Amended Plan, we are making certain other changes which the Talent and Compensation Committee and the Board of Directors believe are consistent with good corporate governance and with our equity compensation practices. These changes include:

expanding the scope of eligible award recipients to include individual consultants of the Company and certain of its affiliates, as determined by our Talent and Compensation Committee;
requiring a one-year minimum vesting period for all awards granted under the Amended Plan, except with respect to five percent (5%) of the shares of common stock reserved for issuance; and
prohibiting the payment of dividends or dividend equivalents that are granted in connection with an award until the shares underlying such award become vested.

As of March 31, 2022, a total of 2,514,786 shares of the Company’s common stock were subject to outstanding awards granted under the 2008 Plan, and an additional 583,570 shares were available for new award grants under the 2008 Plan. The Amended Plan will increase by 9.5 million the number of shares authorized for issuance bringing the total available for issuance up to 10,083,570.

If the requisite shareholder approval is not obtained, the Amended Plan will not take effect but the Company may continue to grant awards under the 2008 Plan in accordance with the current terms and conditions of the 2008 Plan.

We believe that equity incentives are critical to our success. Shareholder approval of the Amended Plan will allow us to continue to provide such incentives in a way that benefits both our service providers and our shareholders.

2022 Proxy – Approval of Amended and Restated 2008 Equity Incentive Plan85

Table of Contents

Approval of Amended and Restated 2008 Equity Incentive Plan

Significant Historical Award Information

The following table provides information regarding the grant of equity awards under the 2008 Plan over the past three completed fiscal years:

Key Equity Metrics

      2019     2020     2021
Equity burn rate(1) 0.3% 0.4% 0.3%
Dilution(2) 2.4% 2.0% 1.4%
Overhang(3) 0.8% 0.9% 0.9%
(1)Equity burn rate is calculated by dividing the gross number of shares issuable pursuant to equity awards granted during the fiscal year by the weighted-average number of shares outstanding during the period. In determining the gross number of shares issuable, we have excluded shares cancelled or forfeited during the period and have counted performance shares and performance units in the year in which they are earned rather than the year in which they were granted.
(2)Dilution is calculated by dividing the sum of (x) the number of shares issuable pursuant to equity awards outstanding at the end of the fiscal year and (y) the number of shares available for future grants at the end of the fiscal year, by the number of shares outstanding at the end of the fiscal year.
(3)Overhang is calculated by dividing the number of shares issuable pursuant to equity awards outstanding at the end of the fiscal year by the number of shares outstanding at the end of the fiscal year.

Overview

The Amended Plan provides for the grant of incentive stock options, nonqualified stock options, stock appreciation rights, stock awards and stock unit awards to employees, non-employee directors and consultants of the Company and certain of its affiliates.

The Amended Plan aims to reflect certain “best practices” that are consistent with the interests of our shareholders and with our corporate governance policies. Accordingly, the Amended Plan reflects the following practices:

No Evergreen Provision. There is no evergreen feature under which the shares authorized for issuance under the Amended Plan may automatically be replenished.
No Liberal Share Recycling. There is no liberal share recycling feature under which shares tendered or withheld in payment of the exercise price of an award and shares tendered or withheld to satisfy tax withholding obligations related to an award may become available for future grants under the Amended Plan.
Limits on Awards to Non-Employee Directors. The value of awards granted to any non-employee director in any calendar year, when aggregated with cash compensation paid to such non-employee director for such calendar year, may not exceed $750,000.
No Repricing of Options Without Shareholder Approval. The Amended Plan does not permit the repricing of outstanding stock options to reduce their exercise, or the exchange of underwater stock options for cash or by substitution for new awards with a lower exercise without shareholder approval, other than in limited circumstances involving a corporate event or transaction that involves the equitable adjustment of awards in order to preserve their aggregate value.
Minimum Vesting Periods. No award may vest earlier than one year following the date of grant, except with respect to five percent (5%) of the shares reserved for issuance.
No Single Trigger Acceleration of Awards upon a Change in Control. Awards will not accelerate simply upon the occurrence of a change in control unless the awards are not assumed or adequately substituted by an acquiror or the applicable participant experiences a termination of employment or service without cause within the 18-month period following the change in control.
86
2022 Proxy – Approval of Amended and Restated 2008 Equity Incentive Plan

Table of Contents

Approval of Amended and Restated 2008 Equity Incentive Plan

Recoupment. The Talent and Compensation Committee shall have full authority to implement any policies and procedures necessary to comply with Section 10D of the Exchange Act. In addition, the Talent and Compensation Committee may require that certain awards be forfeited or repaid by employees who are at the senior vice president level and above in the event of restatements of, or adjustments to, incorrect financial results.

The following is a summary of the principal features of the Amended Plan. This summary does not purport to be a complete description of all of the provisions of the Amended Plan. It is qualified in its entirety by reference to the full text of the Amended Plan, a copy of which is attached to this Proxy Statement as Annex A.

Summary of the Amended Plan

The Amended Plan is administered by the Talent and Compensation Committee. The Talent and Compensation Committee has, among other powers, the power to establish rules and regulations for administering the Amended Plan and to perform other acts relating to the Amended Plan. Decisions of the Talent and Compensation Committee are final and conclusive on all parties. The Board may appoint another committee to perform the functions of the Talent and Compensation Committee under the Amended Plan.

The Talent and Compensation Committee has the discretion to grant to eligible participants one or more equity-based awards, including options, stock appreciation rights, stock awards (including time-based and/or performance-based restricted stock) and stock units (including time-based and/or performance based restricted stock units), or any combination thereof. The Talent and Compensation Committee has the discretion to determine the number or amount of any award to be awarded to any participant subject to the following limitations:

during any calendar year, no one individual (other than a non-employee director) may be granted awards with respect to more than 500,000 shares of our stock; and
during any calendar year, no one non-employee director may be granted awards with a dollar value, measured as of the date of grant, which together with cash compensation paid to such non-employee director for such calendar year, would exceed $750,000. Awards to directors shall be recommended by the Talent and Compensation Committee and approved by the full Board.

If a dividend, recapitalization, stock split, or other similar corporate event or transaction (more fully described in Section 7 of the Amended Plan) affects the shares in such a way that an adjustment is appropriate to prevent dilution or enlargement of the benefits, or potential benefits, intended to be made available under the Amended Plan, the Talent and Compensation Committee shall, in such manner as it may deem equitable and appropriate, adjust: (i) the number of shares (or other securities) which may be made the subject of awards, (ii) the number of shares subject to outstanding awards, (iii) the exercise price with respect to any award, and (iv) any other provision determined by the Talent and Compensation Committee to be necessary for an equitable adjustment. The Talent and Compensation Committee may not take any other action to directly or indirectly reduce, or have the effect of reducing, the total exercise price of any option as established at the time of grant.

Awards may provide that upon their exercise the holder will receive cash, stock, other securities or other awards or any combination thereof, as the Talent and Compensation Committee determines. Any shares of stock deliverable under the Amended Plan may consist in whole or in part of authorized and unissued shares or treasury shares acquired by the Company.

The grant of any award shall count, equal in number to the shares represented by such award, towards the maximum number of shares that may be issued under the Amended Plan. To the extent that an

2022 Proxy – Approval of Amended and Restated 2008 Equity Incentive Plan87

Table of Contents

Approval of Amended and Restated 2008 Equity Incentive Plan

award is forfeited or otherwise does not result in the delivery of shares by the Company, such shares shall be deemed to have not been delivered and shall be restored to the share maximum.

Notwithstanding the foregoing, the following shares shall not become available for grant under the Amended Plan: (i) shares subject to an option that are used to satisfy the exercise price of an option, (ii) shares surrendered or withheld to cover taxes due upon the vesting of an award, (iii) shares subject to a stock appreciation right that are not issued or delivered as a result of the net, stock settlement of a stock appreciation right, or (iv) shares repurchased on the open market with the proceeds of the exercise price of an option.

Except in the case of substitute awards, the exercise price under any stock option and the grant price of any stock appreciation right will not be less than 100% of the fair market value of the stock or other security on the date of the grant of the option, right or award. The Talent and Compensation Committee will determine the times at which options and other purchase rights may be exercised and the methods by which and the forms in which payment of the purchase price may be made. Under the Amended Plan, determinations of the fair market value of shares of the Company’s common stock will be based on the closing sales price on the date in question and determinations of fair market value with respect to other property will be made in accordance with methods or procedures established by the Talent and Compensation Committee.

No awards may be granted under the Amended Plan after the tenth anniversary of the approval of the Amended Plan by our Board of Directors.

Awards

Options. An option is a right to purchase from the Company a stated number of shares at an exercise price and for a period of time established by the Talent and Compensation Committee. The duration of options granted under the Amended Plan will be established by the Talent and Compensation Committee but may not exceed ten years. The Talent and Compensation Committee may impose a vesting schedule on options, and will determine the acceptable form(s) in which the exercise price may be paid.

Options granted under the Amended Plan may be “incentive stock options” (“ISOs”), which afford certain favorable tax treatment for the holder, or “nonqualified stock options” (“NQSOs”). See “Tax Matters” below. Under the Amended Plan, we are restricted from granting “reload” options.

Stock Appreciation Rights. A stock appreciation right (“SAR”) is the right to receive an amount equal to the excess of the fair market value of the shares underlying the SAR over the base price of the SAR. The settlement amount of SARs may be paid in cash or shares. The Talent and Compensation Committee determines the terms of each SAR at the time of the grant. Any SAR may not have a base price less than the fair market value of the stock on the date the SAR is granted and cannot have a term of longer than ten years.

Stock Awards and Stock Units. The Talent and Compensation Committee may issue stock awards in the form of “bonus stock” (i.e. shares not subject to any restrictions or limitations) or in the form of “restricted stock”. In addition, the Talent and Compensation Committee may issue stock unit awards which are awards payable in cash or stock at a future date and represented by a bookkeeping credit. Stock unit awards may also be in the form of units not subject to any restrictions or limitations or in the form of “restricted stock units”.

In the case of both restricted stock and restricted stock units, the award is subject to restrictions on transferability and such other restrictions, if any, as the Talent and Compensation Committee may impose at the date of grant. The restrictions may lapse separately or in combination, at such times, under such circumstances, including, without limitation, a specified period of employment or the satisfaction of pre-established performance goals, and in such installments, or otherwise, as the Talent

88
2022 Proxy – Approval of Amended and Restated 2008 Equity Incentive Plan

Table of Contents

Approval of Amended and Restated 2008 Equity Incentive Plan

and Compensation Committee may determine. Except to the extent provided in the applicable award agreement, a participant granted restricted stock will have all of the rights of a shareholder, including, without limitation, the right to vote and the right to accrue dividends equal to the dividends paid on shares of common stock. If provided in the applicable award agreement, a holder of restricted stock units may be entitled to dividend equivalents with respect to such restricted stock units, which shall accrue and only be paid to the extent the award becomes vested.

Transferability

The Amended Plan provides that, except as described in the following sentence, no options or SARs granted under the Amended Plan may be transferred or otherwise encumbered by the individual to whom it is granted, other than by will, court order or by designation of a beneficiary and that, during the individual’s lifetime, each award will be exercisable only by the individual or by the individual’s guardian or legal representative. The Talent and Compensation Committee may permit options or SARs to be transferred to an option holder’s or SAR holder’s family members or a trust for the benefit of family members, or to certain controlled corporations. Shares represented by restricted stock awards may not be sold, assigned, transferred, pledged or otherwise encumbered, except as permitted by the Talent and Compensation Committee, during the applicable vesting period.

Minimum Vesting Periods

Except with respect to five percent (5%) of the maximum number of shares that may be issued under the Amended Plan, each award shall vest on the basis of the participant’s continued performance of services or the attainment of performance goals. No award which vests on the basis of the participant’s continued performance of services shall vest earlier than one year following the date of grant of such award, and no award which vests on the basis of attainment of performance goals shall provide for a performance period of less than one year; provided, however, that such limitations shall not preclude the acceleration of vesting of such award upon the death or disability of the participant, or in connection with a change in control.

Change in Control

In the event of a “Change in Control”:

with respect to each outstanding award that is assumed or substituted in connection with the Change in Control, if the participant’s employment is terminated by the Company without Cause within the 18-month period following the Change in Control, the awards held by the participant will become fully vested and any restrictions applicable to such awards shall automatically lapse; and
any outstanding awards that are not assumed or substituted in connection with the Change in Control will become fully vested upon the Change in Control and any restrictions applicable to such awards shall automatically lapse (with the exception of options granted within one year of the Change in Control which will vest proportionately based on the number of months the grant was outstanding compared to original vesting period).

The terms “Cause” and “Change in Control” are defined in the Amended Plan.

Eligibility and Participation

Any employee of the Company or its affiliates, including any executive officer, and any consultant or director of the Company or its affiliates, will be eligible to receive awards under the Amended Plan. Additionally, any holder of an outstanding equity-based award issued by a company acquired by the

2022 Proxy – Approval of Amended and Restated 2008 Equity Incentive Plan89

Table of Contents

Approval of Amended and Restated 2008 Equity Incentive Plan

Company may be granted a substitute award under the Amended Plan. The Company and its affiliates had approximately 88,000 employees, 6,000 consultants and 13 directors as of March 31, 2022 that would be eligible to receive awards under the Amended Plan.

Recoupment

The Talent and Compensation Committee shall have full authority to implement any policies and procedures necessary to comply with Section 10D of the Exchange Act and any rules promulgated thereunder. Without limiting the foregoing, each agreement evidencing awards with performance conditions made to employees who are at the senior vice president level or more senior shall include a provision which requires, at a minimum, that in the event that:

it is required under regulations adopted under the Dodd Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act;
the Company’s financial statements covering the applicable performance period are restated due to material non-compliance with financial reporting requirements within two years of the end of the performance period; or
the Talent and Compensation Committee determines, in consultation with the Company’s Audit Committee, that there is a high likelihood that an out-of-period adjustment to the Company’s financial statements covering the applicable performance period would be deemed to be material because there is alleged misconduct of one or more participants associated with the adjustment and, absent the adjustment, the benefits payable to such participant(s) would be materially greater,

the Talent and Compensation Committee may require the award holder to forfeit and/or repay an amount equal to the difference between the amount actually awarded pursuant to such agreement based on the erroneous financial data and the amount of compensation that should have been awarded to the award holder pursuant to such agreement under the accounting restatement or the adjusted financial statements, as applicable, as determined by the Talent and Compensation Committee in its sole discretion taking into account those factors the Talent and Compensation Committee determines necessary or appropriate.

Amendment and Termination

The Talent and Compensation Committee may at any time terminate, suspend or discontinue the Amended Plan. The Talent and Compensation Committee may amend the Amended Plan at any time, provided that no amendment may be made without the approval of the Company’s shareholders (a) to the extent that such approval is required by applicable law or by the listing standards of any applicable exchange(s) on or after the adoption of the Amended Plan, (b) to the extent that such amendment would materially increase the number of securities which may be issued under the Amended Plan, (c) to the extent that such amendment would materially modify the requirements for participation in the Amended Plan, (d) to the extent that such amendment would accelerate the vesting of any restricted stock or restricted stock units under the Amended Plan except as otherwise provided therein or (e) to the extent that such amendment would permit or would result in the purchase of any or all outstanding Options with an Exercise Price greater than fair market value.

90
2022 Proxy – Approval of Amended and Restated 2008 Equity Incentive Plan

Table of Contents

Approval of Amended and Restated 2008 Equity Incentive Plan

Grants and Awards as of December 31, 2021

As of December 31, 2021, the following awards are outstanding under the 2008 Plan for each of the named executive officers below, all current executive officers as a group, all non-employee directors as a group, and all other employees, respectively:

Number of Shares
Underlying
Options/SARs
Weighted Average
Exercise Price of
Options/SARs ($)
Number of Shares
Underlying Restricted
Stock Awards/Stock
Units Awards(1)
Richard D. Fain496,361
Jason T. Liberty183,327
Michael W. Bayley318,552
Harri U. Kulovaara65,109
Lisa Lutoff-Perlo176,858
All Executive Officers as a Group (9 people)1,346,335
All Non-Employee Directors as a Group (11 people)23,580
All Other Employees888,687
(1)For purposes of this column, all unvested performance shares as of December 31, 2021 are reflected at target.

New Plan Benefits

Any awards under the Amended Plan will be at the discretion of the Talent and Compensation Committee or its delegate. Therefore, it is not possible at present to determine the amount or form of any award that will be available for grant to any individual during the term of the Amended Plan.

As of March 31, 2022, the closing price on the New York Stock Exchange of the Company’s common stock was $83.78 per share.

Tax Matters

The following discussion is a brief summary of the principal United States Federal income tax consequences under current Federal income tax laws relating to awards under the Amended Plan. This summary is not intended to be exhaustive and, among other things, does not describe state, local or foreign income and other tax consequences.

Nonqualified Stock Options. An optionee will not recognize any taxable income upon the grant of an NQSO and the Company will not be entitled to a tax deduction with respect to the grant of an NQSO. Upon exercise of an NQSO, the excess of the fair market value of the underlying shares of common stock on the exercise date over the option exercise price will be taxable as compensation income to the optionee and will be subject to applicable withholding taxes. The Company will generally be entitled to a tax deduction at such time in the amount of such compensation income. The optionee’s tax basis for the shares received pursuant to the exercise of an NQSO will equal the sum of the compensation income recognized and the exercise price.

In the event of a sale of shares received upon the exercise of an NQSO, any appreciation or depreciation after the exercise date generally will be taxed as capital gain or loss and will be long-term capital gain or loss if the holding period for such shares is more than one year.

Incentive Stock Options. An optionee will not recognize any taxable income at the time of grant or timely exercise of an ISO and the Company will not be entitled to a tax deduction with respect to such grant or exercise. Exercise of an ISO may, however, give rise to taxable compensation income subject to applicable withholding taxes, and a tax deduction to the Company, if the ISO is not exercised on a timely basis (generally, while the optionee is employed by the Company or within 90 days after termination of employment) or if the optionee subsequently engages in a “disqualifying disposition”,

2022 Proxy – Approval of Amended and Restated 2008 Equity Incentive Plan91

Table of Contents

Approval of Amended and Restated 2008 Equity Incentive Plan

as described below. Also, the excess of the fair market value of the underlying shares on the date of exercise over the exercise price will be an item of income for purposes of the optionee’s alternative minimum tax in the year of exercise.

A sale or exchange by an optionee of shares acquired upon the exercise of an ISO more than one year after the transfer of the shares to such optionee and more than two years after the date of grant of the ISO will result in any difference between the net sale proceeds and the exercise price being treated as long-term capital gain (or loss) to the optionee. If such sale or exchange takes place within two years after the date of grant of the ISO or within one year from the date of transfer of the ISO shares to the optionee, such sale or exchange will generally constitute a “disqualifying disposition” of such shares that will have the following results: any excess of (i) the lesser of (a) the fair market value of the shares at the time of exercise of the ISO and (b) the amount realized on such disqualifying disposition of the shares over (ii) the option exercise price of such shares, will be ordinary income to the optionee, subject to applicable withholding taxes, and the Company will be entitled to a tax deduction in the amount of such income. Any further gain or loss after the date of exercise generally will qualify as capital gain or loss and will not result in any deduction by the Company.

Stock Appreciation Rights. Generally, the recipient of a standalone SAR will not recognize taxable income at the time the standalone SAR is granted. The amount of cash, or the value of stock received upon exercise of the SAR will be taxed as ordinary income to the employee at the time it is received. In general, there will be no federal income tax deduction allowed to the Company upon the grant or termination of SARs. However, upon the exercise of a SAR, the Company will be entitled to a deduction equal to the amount of ordinary income the recipient is required to recognize as a result of the exercise.

Stock and Restricted Stock. A grantee will not recognize any income upon the receipt of restricted stock unless the holder elects under Section 83(b) of the Internal Revenue Code, within thirty days of such receipt, to recognize ordinary income in an amount equal to the fair market value of the restricted stock at the time of receipt, less any amount paid for the shares. If the election is made, the holder generally will not be allowed a deduction for amounts subsequently required to be returned to the Company. If the election is not made, the holder will generally recognize ordinary income, on the date that the stock is no longer subject to vesting restrictions, in an amount equal to the fair market value of such shares on such date, less any amount paid for the shares. With respect to a stock award that is not subject to vesting restrictions, the holder will generally recognize ordinary income on the grant date in an amount equal to the fair market value of such shares on the grant date, less any amount paid for the shares. At the time the holder recognizes ordinary income, the Company generally will be entitled to a deduction in the same amount.

Generally, upon a sale or other disposition of stock or restricted stock with respect to which the holder has recognized ordinary income (i.e., a Section 83(b) election was previously made or the vesting restrictions were previously removed), the holder will recognize capital gain or loss in an amount equal to the difference between the amount realized on such sale or other disposition and the holder’s basis in such shares. Such gain or loss will be long-term capital gain or loss if the holding period for such shares is more than one year.

Restricted Stock Units. The grant of an award of restricted stock units, including units with performance conditions, will not result in income for the grantee or in a tax deduction for the Company. Upon the settlement of such an award, the grantee will recognize ordinary income equal to the aggregate value of the payment received, and the Company generally will be entitled to a tax deduction in the same amount.

Certain Other Tax Issues. In addition to the matters described above, (i) any entitlement to a tax deduction on the part of the Company is subject to applicable federal tax rules (including, without limitation, Section 162(m) of the Internal Revenue Code regarding the $1,000,000 limitation on deductible compensation), (ii) the exercise of an incentive stock option may have implications in

92
2022 Proxy – Approval of Amended and Restated 2008 Equity Incentive Plan

Table of Contents

Approval of Amended and Restated 2008 Equity Incentive Plan

the computation of alternative minimum taxable income, (iii) certain awards under the Amended Plan may be subject to the requirements of Section 457A of the Internal Revenue Code (regarding certain nonqualified deferred compensation), and (iv) if the exercisability or vesting of any award is accelerated because of a change in control, such award (or a portion thereof), either alone or together with certain other payments, may constitute parachute payments under Section 280G of the Internal Revenue Code, which excess amounts may be subject to excise taxes. Officers and directors of the Company subject to Section 16(b) of the Exchange Act may be subject to special tax rules regarding the income tax consequences concerning their awards. The Amended Plan is not subject to any of the requirements of the Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974, as amended. The Amended Plan is not, nor is it intended to be, qualified under Section 401(a) of the Internal Revenue Code.

Registration with the SEC

We intend to file with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission a registration statement on Form S-8 covering the additional shares that would be reserved for issuance under the Amended Plan.

Summary

We believe strongly that the approval of the Amended Plan is important to our continued success. Equity-based compensation such as the awards that would be granted under the Amended Plan are essential to attracting, motivating and retaining high performing individuals.

Board Recommendation

The Board unanimously recommends a vote “FOR” approval of the Amended and Restated 2008 Equity Incentive Plan.

2022 Proxy – Approval of Amended and Restated 2008 Equity Incentive Plan93

Table of Contents

Security Ownership of Certain
Beneficial Owners and Management

Principal Shareholders

This table sets forth information as of March 31, 20222023 about persons we know to beneficially own(1) own(1) more than five percent of our common stock.

Name of Beneficial Owner     Shares of
Common
Stock (#)
     Percentage of
Ownership(2)
Capital International Investors30,538,307(3)11.9%
Capital Research Global Investors27,990,406(4)11.0%
The Vanguard Group23,947,488(5)9.4%
AWILHELMSEN AS21,064,632(6)8.2%
BlackRock, Inc.14,299,319(7)5.6%
Name of Beneficial OwnerShares of
Common
Stock (#)
Percentage of
Ownership(2)
Capital International Investors28,783,559(3)11.3%
Capital Research Global Investors23,740,080(4)9.3%
AWILHELMSEN AS23,206,512(5)9.1%
The Vanguard Group23,041,064(6)9.0%
BlackRock, Inc.13,894,098(7)5.4%
(1)A person is deemed to be the beneficial owner of securities to which such person has the right to acquire within 60 days from March 31, 2022,2023, including upon the exercise of options, warrants and other convertible securities.
(2)Applicable percentage ownership is rounded and based on 254,955,331255,602,951 shares of common stock outstanding as of March 31, 2022.2023.
(3)Represents shares beneficially owned by Capital International Investors, 333 South Hope Street, 55th Floor, Los Angeles, California 90071. Of the total shares owned, the nature of beneficial ownership is as follows: sole voting power over 28,783,55930,230,124 shares and sole dispositive power over 29,444,03530,538,307 shares. The foregoing information is based on Amendment 23 to Schedule 13G/A filed by Capital International Investors with the SEC on February 11, 2022.13, 2023.
(4)Represents shares beneficially owned by Capital Research Global Investors, 333 South Hope Street, 55th Floor, Los Angeles, California 90071. Of the total shares owned, the nature of beneficial ownership is as follows: sole voting power over 23,738,26927,988,103 shares; and sole dispositive power over 23,740,08027,990,406 shares. The foregoing information is based on Amendment 1 to Schedule 13G/A filed by Capital Research Global Investors with the SEC on February 11, 2022.13, 2023.
(5)Represents shares beneficially owned by The Vanguard Group, 100 Vanguard Blvd., Malvern, PA 19355. Of the total shares owned, the nature of beneficial ownership is as follows: shared voting power over 306,374 shares; sole dispositive power over 23,046,666 shares; and shared dispositive power over 900,822 shares. The foregoing information is based solely on Amendment 8 to Schedule 13G/A filed by The Vanguard Group with the SEC on February 9, 2023.
(6)AWILHELMSEN AS is a Norwegian corporation, the indirect beneficial owners of which are members of the Wilhelmsen family of Norway. The shares reported in the table include 5,035,259 shares owned by AWECO Invest AS, an affiliate of AWILHELMSEN AS. AWILHELMSEN AS has the power to vote and dispose of the shares owned by AWECO Invest AS pursuant to an agreement between AWILHELMSEN AS and AWECO Invest AS. The address of AWILHELMSEN AS is Beddingen 8, Aker Brygge, Vika N 0118 Oslo, Norway. The foregoing information is based on aAmendment 4 to Schedule 13G/A and Form 4 filed by AWILHELMSEN AS with the SEC on February 6, 201514, 2023 and December 11, 2020, respectively.
(6)Represents shares beneficially owned by The Vanguard Group, 100 Vanguard Blvd., Malvern, PA 19355. Of the total shares owned, the nature of beneficial ownership is as follows: shared voting power over 343,404; sole dispositive power over 22,164,310 shares; and shared dispositive power over 876,754 shares. The foregoing information is based solely on Amendment 7 to Schedule 13G/AForm 4 filed by The Vanguard GroupArne Alexander Wilhelmsen with the SEC on February 10, 2022.13, 2023.
(7)Represents shares beneficially owned by BlackRock, Inc., 55 East 52nd Street, New York, NY 10055. Of the total shares owned, the nature of beneficial ownership is as follows: sole voting power over 11,953,980;12,881,980 shares; and sole dispositive power over 13,894,09814,299,319 shares. The foregoing information is based solely on Amendment 23 to Schedule 13G/A filed by BlackRock, Inc. with the SEC on February 1, 2022.2023.

9486     
20222023 Proxy – Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management


Table of Contents

Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management

Security Ownership of Directors and Executive Officers

This table sets forth information as of March 31, 20222023 about the number of shares of common stock beneficially owned(1) owned(1) by (i) our directors; (ii) the named executive officers listed in the “Compensation Discussion and Analysis” below; and (iii) our directors and executive officers as a group.

The number of shares beneficially owned by each named person or entity is determined under rules of the SEC, and the information is not necessarily indicative of beneficial ownership for any other purpose.

No shares of common stock held by our directors or named executive officers have been pledged.

Name of Beneficial Owner     Shares of
Common
Stock (#)
      Percentage of
Ownership(2)
      Shares of
Common
Stock (#)
     Percentage of
Ownership
(2)
Michael W. Bayley 22,994  * 75,804*
John F. Brock 19,020(3) * 
John F. Brock21,276*
Richard D. Fain 801,329(4) * 652,619(3)*
Naftali Holtz15,968*
Stephen R. Howe, Jr. 6,117  * 8,373*
William L. Kimsey 25,076  * 27,332*
Harri U. Kulovaara 34,247  * 46,615*
Michael O. Leavitt 0  * 2,256*
Jason T. Liberty 23,557  * 63,566*
Lisa Lutoff-Perlo 17,179  * 47,950*
Amy McPherson 2,392  * 4,648*
Maritza G. Montiel 7,654  * 9.910*
Ann S. Moore 20,823  * 23,079*
Eyal M. Ofer 34,745(5) * 37,001*
William K. Reilly 21,425  * 
Vagn O. Sørensen 27,542  * 26,583*
Donald Thompson 31,381  * 33,637*
Arne Alexander Wilhelmsen 22,499,407(6) 8.8%21,081,397(4)8.2%
All directors and executive officers as a group (22 persons) 23,658,551  9.28%
      
Rebecca Yeung*
All directors and executive officers as a group (19 persons)22,138,7728.7%
*Denotes beneficial ownership of less than 1% of the outstanding shares of common stock
(1)A person is deemed to be the beneficial owner of securities to which such person has the right to acquire within 60 days from March 31, 2022,2023, including upon the exercise of options, warrants and other convertible securities.
(2)Applicable percentage ownership is based on 254,955,331255,602,951 shares of common stock outstanding as of March 31, 2022.2023.
(3)Includes 8,29285,947 shares owned by the Fain Family Foundation and 445,776 shares held indirectly in a Grantor Retained Annuity Trust.
(4)Includes 235,106 shares owned by various trusts primarily for the benefit of certain members of the Fain family. Mr. Fain disclaims beneficial ownership of some or all of these shares. Does This column does not include shares owned by other trusts for the benefit of members of the Fain family in which Mr. Fain does not have any beneficial or pecuniary interest or shares directly or indirectly owned by Mr. Fain’s adult children.
(5)(4)Does not include 11,496,865 shares beneficially owned by Osiris Holdings Inc., a Liberian corporation, the indirect beneficial owner of which is a trust primarily for the benefit of certain members of the Ofer family.
(6)Includes 22,484,89821,064,632 shares beneficially owned by AWILHELMSEN AS. Mr. Wilhelmsen disclaims beneficial ownership of these shares.

20222023 Proxy – Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management95     87


Table of Contents

Equity Compensation Plan Information

Equity Compensation Plan Information

Equity Compensation Plan Information

The following table summarizes our equity plan information as of December 31, 2021.2022.

Plan Category     Column A:
Number of
Securities to Be
Issued Upon
Exercise of
Outstanding
Options,
Warrants
and Rights
     Weighted-Average
Exercise Price of
Outstanding
Options, Warrants
and Rights
     Number of
Securities
Remaining
Available for
Future Issuance
Under Equity
Compensation
Plans (Excluding
Securities Reflected
in Column A)
     Column A:
Number of
Securities to Be
Issued Upon
Exercise of
Outstanding
Options,
Warrants
and Rights
     Weighted-Average
Exercise Price of
Outstanding
Options, Warrants
and Rights
     Number of
Securities
Remaining
Available for
Future Issuance
Under Equity
Compensation
Plans (Excluding
Securities
Reflected
in Column A)
Equity compensation plans approved by security holders 1,461,030(1)  2,699,005(2)1,536,353(1)    11,241,118(2)
Equity compensation plans not approved by security holders   
Total 1,461,030  2,699,0051,536,35311,241,118
      
(3)(1)Includes unvested or unsettled restricted stock units and unvested performance share units under our 2008 Equity Incentive Plan.
(4)(2)Includes 1,274,0919,987,482 shares available for issuance under our 2008 Equity Incentive Plan, as amended and restated, plus 1,424,9141,253,636 shares remaining available, as well as the number of shares subject to purchase during any current purchase period, under the 1994 Employee Stock Purchase Plan. This table does not reflect the number of additional shares that would be available under the Amended and Restated 2008 Equity Incentive Plan if shareholders approve proposal 4.

9688     
20222023 Proxy – Equity Compensation Plan Information


Table of Contents

General Information

Availability of Proxy Materials

Under the rules adopted by the SEC, we are furnishing proxy materials to our shareholders primarily over the Internet. We believe that this process expedites shareholders’ receipt of these materials, lowers the costs of our Annual Meeting and helps to conserve natural resources. On or about April 19, 2022,18, 2023, we mailed to each of our shareholders (other than those who previously requested electronic or paper delivery) a Notice of Internet Availability of Proxy Materials containing instructions on how to access and review the proxy materials, including this proxy statement and our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2021,2022, on the Internet and how to access a proxy card to vote on the Internet. The Notice of Internet Availability of Proxy Materials also contains instructions on how to receive a paper copy of the proxy materials. If you received a Notice of Internet Availability of Proxy Materials by mail, you will not receive a printed copy of the proxy materials unless you request one. If you received paper copies of our proxy materials, you may also view these materials at www.proxyvote.com.

Who May Vote

Each share of our common stock outstanding as of the close of business on April 7, 20226, 2023 (the “Record Date”) is entitled to one vote at the Annual Meeting. At the close of business on the Record Date, 255,060,065255,731,909 shares of our common stock were outstanding and entitled to vote. You may vote all of the shares owned by you as of the close of business on the Record Date. These shares include shares that are (1) held of record directly in your name (in which case, you are a “Record Holder” with respect to such shares) and (2) held for you as the beneficial owner through a broker, bank or other nominee (in which case, you are a “Beneficial Holder” with respect to such shares). There are some distinctions between being a Record Holder and a Beneficial Holder as described herein.

Shares heldHeld of recordRecord

If your shares are registered directly in your name with our transfer agent, American Stock Transfer & Trust Company, you are considered the Record Holder with respect to those shares, and the proxy materials were sent directly to you by Royal Caribbean. As the Record Holder, you have the right to grant your voting proxy directly to us or to vote in person at the Annual Meeting. If you requested to receive printed proxy materials, we have enclosed or sent a proxy card for you to use. You may also vote on the Internet as described in the Notice of Internet Availability of Proxy Materials and below under the heading “How to Vote.”

Shares owned beneficiallyOwned Beneficially

If your shares are held in a stock brokerage account or by a bank or other nominee, you are considered the Beneficial Holder of shares held in street name, and the proxy materials were forwarded to you by your broker or other nominee who is considered, with respect to those shares, the shareholder of record. As the Beneficial Holder, you have the right to direct your broker or other nominee on how to vote the shares in your account, and you are also invited to attend the Annual Meeting.

Requirements to Attend the Annual Meeting

You are invited to attend the Annual Meeting if you are a Record Holder or Beneficial Holder as of the Record Date. If you are a Record Holder, you must bring proof of identification, such as a valid driver’s license, for admission to the Annual Meeting. If you are a Beneficial Holder, you will need to provide proof of ownership by bringing either your proxy card provided to you by your broker or a copy of your brokerage statement showing your share ownership as of the Record Date.

20222023 Proxy – General Information97     89


Table of Contents

General Information

In the interests of mitigating risks related to the ongoing COVID-19 pandemic and to prioritize the well-being of all attendees, including our employees, shareholders and other stakeholders, the following will be implemented at the Annual Meeting:

Social distancing measures will be put in place and closely monitored;
Hand sanitizer will be provided upon entry to, and throughout, the venue;
No food or refreshments will be provided; and
Attendees will be required to comply with health and safety measures implemented at the venue.

Attendees will be required to comply with any additional federal, state and/or local government guidance in force on the day of the Annual Meeting. You should not attend the Annual Meeting if you are suffering from any COVID-19 symptoms or you have come into close contact with someone who has tested positive for COVID-19 within the 14 days preceding the date of the Annual Meeting. You may be asked to complete a Health Declaration Form upon arrival.

How to Vote

Voting in Person

Shares held in your name as the Record Holder may be voted in person at the Annual Meeting. Shares for which you are the Beneficial Holder may be voted in person at the Annual Meeting only if you obtain a legal proxy from the broker or other nominee that holds your shares giving you the right to vote the shares. Even if you plan to attend the Annual Meeting, we recommend that you also vote by proxy in advance of the meeting so that your vote will be counted if you later decide not to attend the meeting.

Voting Without Attending the Annual Meeting

Regardless of how you hold your shares, you may vote your shares without attending the Annual Meeting. You may vote by granting a proxy or, for shares held as a Beneficial Holder, by submitting voting instructions to your broker or other nominee. You may also vote using the Internet or by mail as outlined in the Notice of Internet Availability of Proxy Materials or on your proxy card. Please see the Notice of Internet Availability of Proxy Materials, your proxy card or the information your bank, broker or other holder of record provided to you for more information on these options. Votes cast by Internet have the same effect as votes cast by submitting a written proxy card.

How Proxies Work

All properly executed proxies will be voted in accordance with the instructions contained thereon and, if no choice is specified, the proxies will be voted:

1.FOR the election of the fourteen nominees for director named below (Proposal No. 1);
2.
2.FOR the approval of the compensation of our named executive officers (Proposal No. 2);
3.FOR the option of “ONE YEAR” as the frequency of future advisory votes on executive compensation (Proposal No. 3); and
3.4.FOR the ratification of the selection of PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP (Proposal No. 3); and
4.FOR the Amended and Restated 2008 Equity Incentive Plan (Proposal No. 4).

Under New York Stock Exchange (“NYSE”) rules, if you are a Beneficial Holder and do not provide specific voting instructions in a timely fashion to your broker or other nominee that holds your shares, such broker or nominee will not be authorized to vote your shares on any matters other than Proposal No. 34 regarding the ratification of the auditors. Therefore, failure to provide your broker or other nominee with specific voting instructions in a timely fashion will result in “broker non-votes” with respect to Proposals No. 1, 2, and 4.

98
2022 Proxy – General Information

Table of Contents3.

General Information

Matters to be Presented

We are not aware of any matters to be presented for a vote at the Annual Meeting other than those described in this proxy statement. If any matters not described in this proxy statement are properly presented at the meeting, the proxies will use their own judgment to determine how to vote your shares. If the meeting is postponed or adjourned, the proxies will vote your shares on the new meeting date in accordance with your previous instructions unless you have revoked your proxy.

Votes Necessary to Approve Proposals

We will hold the Annual Meeting if we have a quorum, which requires the presence, in person or represented by proxy, of holders of a majority of the outstanding shares of common stock as of the Record Date. If you vote via the Internet or sign and return your proxy card, your shares will be counted to determine whether we have a quorum, even if you abstain or fail to vote on any of the proposals listed on the proxy card. If the persons present or represented by proxy at the Annual Meeting constitute the holders of less than a majority of the outstanding shares of common stock as of the Record Date, we will not have a quorum and the Annual Meeting may be adjourned to a subsequent date for the purpose of obtaining a quorum.

The affirmative vote of a majority of the votes cast is required to approve each proposal.

Although abstentions and broker non-votes will be counted for purposes of determining whether a quorum is present, they will not have any effect on the outcome of any proposal.

90     2023 Proxy – General Information


Table of Contents

General Information

Prior to the Annual Meeting, we will select one or more inspectors of election for the meeting. Such inspectors shall determine the number of shares of common stock represented at the Annual Meeting, the existence of a quorum and the validity and effect of proxies. They shall also receive, count and tabulate ballots and votes and determine the results thereof.

Revoking a Proxy

Any proxy may be revoked by a shareholder at any time prior to the final vote at the Annual Meeting by voting again on a later date via the Internet (only your latest Internet proxy submitted prior to the Annual Meeting will be counted), by signing and submitting a later dated proxy or by attending the Annual Meeting and voting in person. However, your attendance at the Annual Meeting will not automatically revoke your proxy unless you vote again at the Annual Meeting or specifically request that your prior proxy be revoked by delivering to our Corporate Secretary at 1050 Caribbean Way, Miami, Florida 33132 a written notice of revocation prior to the Annual Meeting.

Proposals of Shareholders for Next Year

Proposals of shareholders intended to be considered for inclusion in our proxy statement for our 20232024 Annual Meeting of Shareholders must be received by our Corporate Secretary no later than December 20, 20222023 at our executive offices: 1050 Caribbean Way, Miami, Florida 33132. Such proposals will need to comply with SEC regulations regarding the inclusion of shareholder proposals in company sponsored proxy statements. Any proposals for consideration at our next annual meeting of shareholders, but not included in our proxy statement, must be received by the Corporate Secretary of the Company no later than February 2, 2023.2024 in accordance with our Bylaws.

In addition, in order for shareholders to give timely notice of nominations for directors for inclusion on a universal proxy card in connection with the 2024 Annual Meeting, notice must be submitted by the same deadline as disclosed above under the advance notice provisions of our Bylaws and must include the information in the notice required by our Bylaws and by Rule 14a-19(b)(2) and Rule 14a-19(b)(3) under the Exchange Act.

Solicitation of Proxies

This proxy statement is furnished in connection with the solicitation of proxies by the Company on behalf of the Board. We will pay the cost of this proxy solicitation. In addition to soliciting proxies by mail, we expect that a number of our employees will solicit shareholders for the same type of proxy, personally and by telephone or other electronic means. None of these employees will receive any additional or special

2022 Proxy – General Information99

Table of Contents

General Information

compensation for assisting us in soliciting proxies. Okapi Partners has been retained to assist in soliciting proxies at a fee of approximately $14,500,$15,500, plus distribution costs and other expenses. We will, on request, reimburse banks, brokerage firms and other nominees for their expenses in sending proxy materials to their customers who are beneficial owners of our common stock and obtaining their voting instructions.

2023 Proxy – General Information     91


Table of Contents

General Information

Notice Regarding Delivery of Security Holder Documents

Under the SEC rules, delivery of one proxy statement and annual report to two or more investors sharing the same mailing address is permitted, under certain conditions. This procedure, called “householding,” applies to you if all of the following criteria are met:

(1)You have the same address as other security holders registered on our books;
(2)You have the same last name as the other security holders; and
(3)Your address is a residential address or post office box.

(1) You have the same address as other security holders registered on our books;

(2) You have the same last name as the other security holders; and

(3) Your address is a residential address or post office box.

If you meet these criteria, you are eligible for householding and the following terms apply. If you are not eligible, please disregard this notice.

For Registered Shareholders

Only one proxy statement and annual report will be delivered to the shared mailing address. You will, however, still receive separate mailings of important and personal information, as well as a separate proxy card.

What do I need to do to receive just one set of annual disclosure materials?

You do not have to do anything. Unless Broadridge is notified otherwise within 60 days of the mailing of this notice, your consent is implied and only one set of materials will be sent to your household. This consent is considered perpetual, which means you will continue to receive a single proxy statement/ annual report in the future unless you notify us otherwise.

What if I want to receive multiple sets of materials?

If you would like to receive multiple sets of materials, call or write Broadridge at 800-542-1061 or 51 Mercedes Way, Edgewood, NY 11717. A separate set of materials will be sent to you promptly.

What if I consent to have one set of materials mailed now, but change my mind later?

Call or write Broadridge to turn off the householding instructions for yourself. You will then be sent a separate proxy statement and annual report within 30 days of receipt of your instruction.

The reason I receive multiple sets of materials is that some of the stock belongs to my children. What happens when they move out and no longer live in my household?

When there is an address change for one of the members of the household, materials will be sent directly to the shareholder at his or her new address.

Annual Report on Form 10-K

We will provide without charge to each person solicited by this proxy statement, upon the written request of such person, a copy of our annual report on Form 10-K, as filed with the SEC, for our most recent fiscal year. Such written requests should be directed to investor relations, Royal Caribbean Cruises Ltd., 1050 Caribbean Way, Miami, Florida 33132.

10092     
20222023 Proxy – General Information


Table of Contents

Annex A to Proxy Statement

RoyalMiami, Florida
royalcaribbeangroup.com
1050
Caribbean Cruises Ltd.
Way
Miami, FL 33132




















2008 Equity Incentive Plan


Amended and Restated as of [        ], 2022

Table of Contents

SectionPage
SECTION 1.PURPOSE AND EFFECTIVENESSA-2
SECTION 2.DEFINITIONS AND RULES OF CONSTRUCTIONA-2
SECTION 3.ELIGIBILITY AND PARTICIPATIONA-6
SECTION 4.STOCK SUBJECT TO PLANA-6
SECTION 5.FORMS AND TERMS OF AWARDS UNDER THE PLANA-7
SECTION 6.EXERCISES OF STOCK OPTIONSA-11
SECTION 7.EVENTS AFFECTING PLAN RESERVE OR PLAN AWARDSA-12
SECTION 8.ADMINISTRATIONA-14
SECTION 9.GOVERNMENT REGULATIONS AND REGISTRATION OF SHARESA-15
SECTION 10.MISCELLANEOUS PROVISIONSA-15
SECTION 11.TERM; AMENDMENT AND TERMINATION; STOCKHOLDER APPROVAL OF THIS PLANA-18

2022 Proxy – Amended and Restated 2008 Equity Incentive PlanA-1

Table of Contents

Amended and Restated 2008 Equity Incentive Plan

Section 1. Purpose and Effectiveness

(A)The purpose of this 2008 Equity Incentive Plan, as amended and restated (the “Plan”), is to promote the success of Royal Caribbean Cruises Ltd., a Liberian corporation (the “Company”), by providing a method whereby employees, consultants and directors of the Company and its Affiliates may be encouraged to increase their proprietary interest in the Company’s business. By offering incentive compensation opportunities that are based on the Company’s common stock, the Plan will motivate Participants to achieve long-range goals, further identify their interests with those of the Company’s other shareholders, and promote the long-term financial interest of the Company. The Plan is further intended to aid in attracting and retaining persons of exceptional ability and leadership qualities to become officers, employees, consultants, and directors of the Company and its Affiliates.
(B)The Plan, as set forth herein, is effective as of the Effective Date (as defined in Section 11) and is an amendment and restatement of the Royal Caribbean Cruises Ltd. 2008 Equity Incentive Plan, as amended, which was originally approved by our shareholders on May 13, 2008 and subsequently amended and restated as of May 20, 2016 (the “2008 Plan”). Awards granted to Participants under the 2008 Plan prior to the Effective Date shall be treated in accordance with the terms and conditions of the 2008 Plan as in effect prior to the Effective Date.
(C)No Awards may be granted under the Plan following the tenth anniversary of the approval of the Plan by the Board.

Section 2. Definitions and Rules of Construction

(A)Defined Terms. Capitalized terms not defined elsewhere in the Plan shall have the following meanings (whether used in the singular or plural):

(i)“Affiliate” means any business entity, regardless of whether organized as a corporation, limited liability company, partnership or any other legal form, in which the Company has (i) an ownership of 50% or greater, or (ii) an entity with respect to which the Company possesses the power, directly or indirectly, to direct or cause the direction of the management and policies of that entity, whether through the Company’s ownership of voting securities, by contract or otherwise.
(ii)“Agreement” means a written instrument (including an electronic instrument), which need not be executed by the Participant, that sets out the terms of the grant of an Award, as any such Agreement may be supplemented or amended from time to time.
(iii)“Award” means any award or benefit granted under the Plan, as further defined in Section 5(A) of the Plan.
(iv)“Beneficiary” means the individual(s) designated by the Participant to succeed to his/ her rights in all Awards granted to him/her under the Plan in the eventuality of his/her death or Disability.
(v)“Board” means the Board of Directors of the Company.
(vi)“Cause” shall mean (1) if such term is defined in an employment agreement between the Participant and the Company or Affiliate, as such term is defined therein or (2) (a) an act of material dishonesty, including, without limitation, fraud, misappropriation, embezzlement, financial misrepresentation or other similar behavior, (b) conviction of, or the entry of a plea of guilty or nolo contendere to, the commission of a felony; (c) an action or failure to act that demonstrates a conflict of interest in which the person
A-2
2022 Proxy – Amended and Restated 2008 Equity Incentive Plan

Table of Contents

Amended and Restated 2008 Equity Incentive Plan

acts for his or her own benefit to the detriment of the Company; (d) an action or failure to act that constitutes a material breach of the person’s duties to the Company; (e) the failure to follow the lawful directives of the Company provided that those directives are consistent with the person’s duties to the Company; or (f) violations of the Company’s code of conduct or any other applicable employment and workplace policies.
(vii)“Change of Control” shall mean:

(1)the acquisition by any individual, entity or group of beneficial ownership (as such term is defined in Rule 13d-3 promulgated under the Exchange Act) of more than 50% of the then outstanding voting securities of the Company entitled to vote generally in the election of Directors (the “Voting Securities”);
(2)during any period of 24 consecutive months, a majority of the Board shall no longer be composed of individuals (a) who were members of the Board on the first day of such period, or (b) whose election or nomination to the Board were approved by a vote of at least a majority of the members of the Board who were members of the Board on the first day of such period, or (c) whose election or nomination to the Board was approved by a vote of at least a majority of the members of the Board referred to in the foregoing subclauses (a) and (b);
(3)consummation of a reorganization, merger or consolidation or sale or other disposition of all or substantially all of the assets of the Company (a “Business Combination”) unless, following such Business Combination (a) the beneficial owners of the Voting Securities of the Company immediately prior to the Business Combination beneficially own more than 50% of the combined voting power of the voting securities entitled to vote generally in the election of directors of the corporation resulting from such Business Combination, and (b) at least a majority of the board of directors of the corporation resulting from such Business Combination were members of the Company’s Board at the time of the action of the Company’s Board providing for such Business Combination;
(4)consummation of a reorganization, merger or consolidation with another corporation or business entity not already under common control with the Company, or the acquisition of stock or assets of such other corporation or business entity, if the market capitalization of the other corporation or entity, or the stock or assets acquired, is equal to or greater than the Company’s market capitalization immediately prior to the closing of such transaction; or
(5)the complete liquidation or dissolution of the Company.

(viii)“Code” means the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended from time to time, or any successor statute or statutes thereto. Reference to any specific Code section shall include any successor section.
(ix)“Committee” means the Talent and Compensation Committee of the Board.
(x)“Company” means Royal Caribbean Cruises Ltd., a Liberian corporation and any successor entity.
(xi)“Consultant” means each individual who performs services for the Company or an Affiliate, and who is determined by the Committee to be a consultant to the Company or an Affiliate.
2022 Proxy – Amended and Restated 2008 Equity Incentive PlanA-3

Table of Contents

Amended and Restated 2008 Equity Incentive Plan

(xii)“Date of Grant” means the date on which the Committee takes the corporate actions necessary to fix the major terms of an Award to a specified Eligible Individual, including, in the case of an Option, the number of Shares subject to the Option and the applicable Exercise Price.
(xiii)“Director” means a duly elected or appointed member of the Board or the Board of Directors of an Affiliate.
(xiv)“Disability” means, unless otherwise provided in an Award Agreement, a disability that would entitle a Participant to payment of monthly disability payments under any Company disability plan or as otherwise determined by the Committee; provided, a disability shall not be considered a Disability with respect to any 409A Covered Award (as defined in Section 10(H)) that provides for a payment upon Disability unless such disability also constitutes a “disability” as defined in Treasury Regulation section 1.409A-3(i)(4) or a successor provision; further provided, that with respect to an Incentive Stock Option, disability shall mean a permanent and total disability within the meaning of Section 22(e)(3) of the Code.
(xv)“Eligible Individual” means an Employee, Consultant or Director who is described in Section 3(A) of the Plan.
(xvi)“Employee” means an individual who is employed by the Company or any Affiliate.
(xvii)“Exchange Act” means the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended from time to time, or any successor statute or statutes thereto. Reference to any specific Exchange Act section shall include any successor section.
(xviii)“Executive Officer” means an executive officer of the Company as defined in Rule 3b-7 under the Exchange Act, provided that, if the Board has designated the executive officers of the Company for purposes of reporting under the Exchange Act, the designation by the Board shall be conclusive for purposes of the Plan.
(xix)“Exercise Price” means the price that must be paid by an Optionee upon exercise of an Option to purchase a share of Stock.
(xx)“Fair Market Value” of a Share of Stock as of any date means the closing sale prices of the Stock (i) on the date on the principal exchange or market on which the Stock is then listed or admitted to trading, or (ii) if the day is not a date on which such exchange or market is open, the last preceding date on which there was a sale of such Stock on such exchange or market, or (iii) as otherwise determined by the Committee, in good faith and in a manner consistent with Section 409A of the Code, if the Stock is not listed on an exchange.
(xxi)“Option” means a right to purchase from the Company a stated number of Shares at an Exercise Price and for a period of time established by the Committee.
(xxii)“Optionee” means an Eligible Individual who has received an Option under this Plan, for the period of time during which such Option is held in whole or in part.
(xxiii)“Option Shares” means, with respect to any Option granted under this Plan, the Stock that may be acquired upon the exercise of such Option.
(xxiv)“Non-Employee Director” means a Director who is not an Employee.
A-4
2022 Proxy – Amended and Restated 2008 Equity Incentive Plan

Table of Contents

Amended and Restated 2008 Equity Incentive Plan

(xxv)“Participant” means an Eligible Individual who has received an Award under this Plan.
(xxvi)“Settlement Date” means the date on which Stock, cash, cash equivalents, or any combination thereof are transferred by the Company to a Participant with respect to, and in settlement of, a prior contractual commitment made by the Company to such Participant under the Plan in the form of Stock Units or Stock Appreciation Rights, or the net settlement of an Option.
(xxvii)“Shares” or “Stock” mean shares of the common stock of the Company, par value $.01, subject to any adjustments made under Section 7 of the Plan or by operation of law.
(xxviii)“Subsidiary” of the Company means any present or future subsidiary (as that term is defined in Section 424(f) of the Code, without regard to Section 424(f)’s limitation to corporations) of the Company An entity shall be deemed a subsidiary of the Company for purposes of this definition only for such periods as the requisite ownership or control relationship is maintained.
(xxix)“Substitute Awards” shall mean Awards granted in assumption of, or in substitution for, outstanding awards previously granted by a company acquired by the Company or with which the Company combines.
(xxx)“Termination of Service”, “Terminate” or “Termination” occurs when a Participant ceases to be an Employee, Consultant or a Director of the Company and its Affiliates, as the case may be, for any reason; provided, however, that a Participant’s change of status from Employee to Consultant or vice versa, or Employee to Director or vice versa, shall not constitute a Termination of Service unless otherwise determined by the Committee in writing. With respect to any Section 409A Covered Award, a Participant’s Termination of Service means a Participant’s “separation from service” (as such term is defined and used in Section 409A of the Code).
(xxxi)“Vest”, “Vested”, and “Vesting” means, with respect to any portion of an Award, that the Award will not be forfeited by the Participant pursuant to the provisions of this Plan in the event the Participant Terminates Service with the Company or any Affiliate; provided, however, that in the event the Award is based on the achievement of individual, divisional, corporate or other goals, the “Vesting” of the Award shall occur, except as otherwise determined by the Committee in writing, upon the later of (x) the date such Award is no longer forfeitable in the event the Participant Terminates Service with the Company or any Affiliate and (y) the date that achievement of the applicable goals is determined by the Committee.
(xxxii)“Vesting Date” with respect to any Award granted hereunder means the date on which such Award becomes Vested, as designated in or determined in accordance with the Plan and, subject to Section 5(F) hereof, with the Award Agreement. If more than one Vesting Date is designated for an Award, reference in the Plan to a Vesting Date in respect of such Award shall be deemed to refer to each part of such Award and the Vesting Date for such part.

(B)Rules of Construction. Where the context permits, words in any gender shall include the other gender, words in the singular shall include the plural, and the plural shall include the singular.
2022 Proxy – Amended and Restated 2008 Equity Incentive PlanA-5

Table of Contents

Amended and Restated 2008 Equity Incentive Plan

Section 3. Eligibility and Participation

(A)The persons who shall be eligible to participate in the Plan and to receive Awards shall be such Employees (including Executive Officers), Consultants and Directors, as the Committee, in its sole discretion, shall select. Awards may be made to Eligible Individuals who hold or have held Awards under this Plan or any similar plan or other awards under any other plan of the Company. Holders of Options and other types of Awards granted by a company acquired by the Company or with which the Company combines are eligible for grant of Substitute Awards hereunder. Any member of the Committee shall be eligible to receive Awards while serving on the Committee.
(B)Awards may be granted by the Committee at any time and from time to time to new Participants, or to then Participants, or to a greater or lesser number of Participants, and may include or exclude previous Participants, as the Committee shall determine. All Awards made to members of the Board shall be recommended by the Committee and approved by the full Board. Except as required by this Plan, Awards granted at different times need not contain similar provisions. The Committee’s determinations under the Plan (including without limitation, determinations of which individuals, if any, are to receive Awards, the form, amount and timing of such Awards, the terms and provisions of such Awards and the agreements evidencing same) need not be uniform and may be made by it selectively among individuals who receive, or are eligible to receive, under the Plan.

Section 4. Stock Subject to Plan

(A)Subject to the following provisions of this Section 4 and to the provisions of Section 7, the maximum number of Shares with respect to which any Awards may be granted, including Awards of Incentive Options as defined in Section 5(A)(i), during the term of the Plan (including Shares previously approved by the Company’s shareholders) shall be 10,083,570. During any calendar year, no one individual (other than a Non-Employee Director) shall be granted, under this Plan, Awards with respect to more than 500,000 Shares. During any calendar year, no one Non-Employee Director shall be granted, under this Plan, Awards with a dollar value, measured as of the Date of Grant, which together with cash compensation paid to such Non-Employee Director for such calendar year, would exceed $750,000. Shares underlying Substitute Awards shall not reduce the number of Shares remaining available for issuance hereunder.
(B)During the term of this Plan, the Company will at all times reserve and keep available the number of Shares that shall be sufficient to satisfy the requirements of this Plan. Shares will be made available from the currently authorized but unissued shares of the Company or from shares currently held or subsequently reacquired by the Company as treasury shares, including shares purchased in the open market or in private transactions.
(C)The grant of any Award hereunder shall count, equal in number to the Shares represented by such Award, towards the share maximum indicated in Section 4(A). To the extent that (i) any outstanding Option for any reason expires, is terminated, forfeited or canceled without having been exercised, or if any other Award is forfeited or otherwise does not result in the delivery of Shares by the Company, and (ii) any Shares covered by an Award are not delivered because the Award is settled in cash, such Shares shall be deemed to have not been delivered and shall be restored to the share maximum. Notwithstanding the foregoing, the following Shares shall not become available for grant under the Plan: (i) Shares subject to an Option that are used to satisfy the exercise price of an Option, (ii) Shares surrendered or withheld to cover taxes due
A-6
2022 Proxy – Amended and Restated 2008 Equity Incentive Plan

Table of Contents

Amended and Restated 2008 Equity Incentive Plan

upon the vesting of an Award, (iii) Shares subject to a Stock Appreciation Right that are not issued or delivered as a result of the net, stock settlement of a Stock Appreciation Right, or (iv) Shares repurchased on the open market with the proceeds of the exercise price of an Option.

Section 5. Forms and Terms of Awards under the Plan

(A)In General. The Committee may grant any of the following types of Awards, either singly or in combination with other Awards:

(i)Incentive Stock Options. An incentive stock option (an “Incentive Option”) is any Option that complies with the requirements of Section 422 of the Code.
(ii)Nonqualified Stock Options. A nonqualified stock option (a “Nonqualified Option”) is any Option that is not an Incentive Option.
(iii)Stock Appreciation Rights. A Stock Appreciation Right is an Award in the form of a right to receive, upon surrender of the right, but without other payment an amount based on appreciation in the value of Stock over a base price established in the Award, at times and upon conditions (which may include a Change of Control) as may be approved by the Committee.
(iv)Stock Awards. Stock awards may be in the form of Shares not subject to any restrictions or limitations imposed by this Plan (“Bonus Stock”), or of Restricted Stock. “Restricted Stock” is an Award of Shares that is issued to a Participant such that the Participant is thereupon the legal owner of such Shares with all of the attendant rights and privileges of ownership (unless otherwise provided in the accompanying Award Agreement), but remains subject to a risk of forfeiture of such ownership back to the Company for a period of time specified on the Date of Grant. Such forfeiture may be conditioned on the continued performance of services or on the achievement of individual, divisional, corporate, or other goals. Restricted Stock will also be subject to restrictions on transfer and such other restrictions on incidents of ownership as may be set forth in the Award Agreement, and for such period of time, as the Committee may determine.
(v)Stock Unit Awards. A Stock Unit is an Award payable in cash or Stock and represented by a bookkeeping credit, in which both the number of Shares and the Settlement Date are fixed on the Date of Grant. The value of each Stock Unit equals the Fair Market Value of a share of Stock, as such value may change up to the date the Stock Unit is settled. Stock Units may be in the form of Stock Units not subject to any restrictions or limitations imposed by this Plan (“Deferred Stock Units”), or of “Restricted Stock Units”, in which case, the settlement of the Award may be made contingent, in the sole discretion of the Committee, upon (A) solely continued service, (B) the achievement of individual, divisional, corporate, or other goals, and/or (C) other limitations or restrictions. Stock Units are not outstanding shares of Stock and do not entitle a Participant to voting or other rights or dividends with respect to Stock, unless and until actually paid out in the form of Stock. The restrictions and limitations imposed on Restricted Stock Unit Awards may vary among Participants and from year to year, and the Committee may assign varying titles to different forms of Restricted Stock Units.
(vi)Dividend Equivalents. The Committee may, in its sole discretion, grant dividend equivalents in connection with any Award. Such dividend equivalents shall be converted to cash or additional Shares, or some combination thereof, by such formula and at such time and subject to such limitations as may be determined by the Committee.Notwithstanding the foregoing, dividend equivalents shall accrue and only be paid to the extent an Award becomes vested.
2022 Proxy – Amended and Restated 2008 Equity Incentive PlanA-7

Table of Contents

Amended and Restated 2008 Equity Incentive Plan

(B)Provisions Applicable to All Forms of Awards.

(i)Subsequent to the grant of any Award, the Committee may, at any time before the complete expiration of such Award, accelerate the time or times at which such Award may become nontransferable, exercisable and/or settled, in whole or in part.
(ii)To the extent that the Company is required to withhold any Federal, state or other taxes in respect of any compensation income realized by the Participant in respect of Shares acquired pursuant to an Award, or in respect of the exercise, settlement, or vesting of any such Awards, then, except as otherwise agreed between the Company and the Participant prior to the date of the required withholding, the Company shall deduct from either the Shares issuable or any payments of any kind otherwise due to such Participant the aggregate amount of such Federal, state or other taxes required to be so withheld; provided however, that if the Company deducts from the Shares issuable, the dollar value of the Shares deducted may not be greater than the amount required under the maximum applicable tax rate. If such payments are insufficient to satisfy such Federal, state or other taxes, then such Participant will be required to pay to the Company, or make other arrangements satisfactory to the Company regarding payment to the Company of, the aggregate amount of any such taxes. All matters with respect to the total amount of taxes to be withheld in respect of any such compensation income shall be determined by the Company in its sole discretion.

(C)Provisions Applicable to Options and Stock Appreciation Rights.

(i)Subject to the limitations of the Plan, the Committee shall designate from time to time those Eligible Individuals to be granted Options, the date when each Option shall be granted, the number of Shares subject to such Option, whether such Option is an Incentive Option or a Nonqualified Option, and the Exercise Price of the Option Shares.Options shall be evidenced by Agreements in such form and containing such terms and provisions not inconsistent with the provisions of the Plan as the Committee may from time to time approve. Each Optionee shall be notified of such grant and a written Agreement shall be delivered by the Company to the Optionee. Subject to the other provisions of the Plan, the same person may receive Incentive Options and Nonqualified Options at the same time and pursuant to the same Agreement, provided that Incentive Options and Nonqualified Options are clearly designated as such.
(ii)Option Agreements may provide that the grant of any Option under the Plan, or that Stock acquired pursuant to the exercise of any Option, shall be subject to such other conditions (whether or not applicable to an Option or Stock received by any other Optionee) as the Committee determines appropriate, including, without limitation, provisions conditioning exercise upon the occurrence of certain events or performance or the passage of time, provisions to assist the Optionee in financing the purchase of Stock through the exercise of Options, provisions for forfeiture, restrictions on resale or other disposition of shares acquired pursuant to the exercise of Options, provisions conditioning the grant of the Option or future Options upon the Optionee retaining ownership of Shares acquired upon exercise for a stated period of time, and provisions to comply with federal and state securities laws and federal and state income tax and other payroll tax withholding requirements.
(iii)The price at which Shares may be purchased upon exercise of an Option shall be fixed by the Committee on the Date of Grant and may not be less than 100% of the Fair Market Value of the Option Shares on the Date of Grant or, if specified by the Committee, on a date subsequent to the Date of Grant that is identified as the effective
A-8
2022 Proxy – Amended and Restated 2008 Equity Incentive Plan

Table of Contents

Amended and Restated 2008 Equity Incentive Plan

date of the Award. All Options shall specify the term during which the Option may be exercised, which shall be in all cases ten years or less.
(iv)No Option may be exercised in part or in full before the date(s) therefore set forth in its terms, other than in the event of acceleration as provided in Section 5(B)(i) or Section 7. No Option may be exercised after the Option expires by its terms as set forth in the applicable Agreement. In the case of an Option that is exercisable in installments, installments that are exercisable and not exercised shall remain exercisable during the term of the Option. The grant of an Option shall impose no obligation on the Optionee to exercise such Option.
(v)No Option shall be transferable other than by will or the laws of descent and distribution, other than pursuant to an order issued by a court of competent jurisdiction in connection with the divorce or bankruptcy of the Participant. During the lifetime of the Optionee, the Option shall be exercisable only by such Optionee or his/her court-appointed legal representative or transferee. Notwithstanding anything herein to the contrary, the Committee may, in its sole discretion, provide in the applicable Agreement evidencing a Nonqualified Option that the Optionee may transfer, assign or otherwise dispose of an option (i) to his/her spouse, parents, siblings and lineal descendants, (ii) to a trust for the benefit of the Optionee and any of the foregoing, or (iii) to any corporation or partnership controlled by the Optionee, subject to such conditions or limitations as the Committee may establish to ensure compliance with any rule promulgated pursuant to the Exchange Act, or for other purposes. The terms applicable to the assigned Option shall be the same as those in effect for the Option immediately prior to such assignment and shall be set forth in such documents issued to the assignee as the Company may deem appropriate.
(vi)An Optionee or a transferee of an Option shall have no rights as a shareholder with respect to any Share covered by his/her Option until he/she shall have become the holder of record of such Share, and he/she shall not be entitled to any dividends or distributions or other rights in respect of such Share for which the record date is prior to the date on which he/she shall have become the holder of record thereof.
(vii)Without the consent of the shareholders of the Company, except as provided in Section 7(A) or in connection with the grant of Substitute Awards, the Committee shall have no authority to effect (i) the repricing of any outstanding Options under the Plan, (ii) the cancellation of any outstanding Options under the Plan and the grant in substitution therefor new Options or other Awards, in any case covering the same or different numbers of Shares that has the effect of an indirect repricing, or (iii) cashing out Options that have an Exercise Price greater than the then-Fair Market Value of the Shares.
(viii)The following additional provisions shall be applicable to Incentive Options, but only if, and to the extent, required by section 422 of the Code:

(a)Incentive Options shall be specifically designated as such in the applicable Agreement, and may be granted only to those Eligible Individuals who are both (i) Employees of the Company and/or a Subsidiary, and (ii) citizens or resident aliens of the United States.
(b)To the extent the aggregate Fair Market Value (determined as of the time the Option is granted) of the Stock with respect to which any Incentive Options granted hereunder may be exercisable for the first time by the Optionee in any calendar year (under this Plan or any other compensation plan of the Company or
2022 Proxy – Amended and Restated 2008 Equity Incentive PlanA-9

Table of Contents

Amended and Restated 2008 Equity Incentive Plan

any Subsidiary thereof) exceeds $100,000, such Options shall not be considered Incentive Options.
(c)No Incentive Option may be granted to an individual who, at the time the Option is granted, owns directly, or indirectly within the meaning of Section 424(d) of the Code, stock possessing more than 10% of the total combined voting power of all classes of stock of the Company or of any Subsidiary thereof, unless such Option (i) has an exercise price of at least 110% of the Fair Market Value of the Stock on the Date of Grant of such option; and (ii) cannot be exercised more than five years after the Date of Grant.
(d)The Exercise Price for Incentive Options shall not be less than the Fair Market Value of the Stock on the Date of Grant.

(ix)Options that provide for the automatic grant of another Option upon exercise of the original Option (“Reload Options”) may not be granted under the Plan.
(x)Each of the above provisions with respect to the granting, vesting, transferability, exercise and repurchase of Options, except to the extent they are applicable solely to (i) the actual purchase of stock and payment of consideration or (ii) Incentive Options, shall also apply to the grant of Stock Appreciation Rights by the Committee under the Plan.

(D)Provisions Applicable to Certain Stock Awards and Stock Unit Awards.

(i)Awards of Restricted Stock and Restricted Stock Units shall be subject to the right of the Company to require forfeiture of such Shares or rights by the Participant in the event that conditions specified by the Committee in the applicable Agreement are not satisfied prior to the end of the applicable vesting period established by the Committee for such Awards. Conditions for forfeiture (or repurchase) may be based on continuing employment or service or achievement of pre-established individual, divisional, corporate, or other goals.
(ii)A Stock Unit may provide the Participant with the right to receive dividend equivalent payments with respect to Stock subject to the Award, which payments shall be credited to an account for the Participant and only be paid after the Stock subject to the Award is earned, vested, or acquired, and may be settled in cash or Stock, as determined by the Committee. Any such settlements, and any such crediting of dividend equivalents or reinvestment in shares of Stock, may be subject to such conditions, restrictions and contingencies as the Committee shall establish, including the reinvestment of such credited amounts in Stock equivalents.
(iii)Shares represented by Restricted Stock Awards may not be sold, assigned, transferred, pledged or otherwise encumbered, except as permitted by the Committee, during the applicable vesting period. Such Shares shall be evidenced in such manner as the Committee may determine. Any certificates issued in respect of such Shares shall be registered in the name of the Participant and, unless otherwise determined by the Committee, deposited by the Participant, together with a stock power endorsed in blank, with the Company (or its designee). To the extent Shares of a Restricted Stock Award become nonforfeitable, the Company (or such designee) shall deliver such certificates to the Participant or, if the Participant has died, to the Participant’s Beneficiary. Each certificate evidencing stock subject to Restricted Stock Awards shall bear an appropriate legend referring to the terms, conditions and restrictions applicable to such Award. Any attempt to dispose of stock in contravention of such
A-10
2022 Proxy – Amended and Restated 2008 Equity Incentive Plan

Table of Contents

Amended and Restated 2008 Equity Incentive Plan

terms, conditions and restrictions shall be ineffective. During the restriction period and unless otherwise provided in the Agreement evidencing the Award, the Participant shall have all the rights of a shareholder for all such Shares, including the right to vote and the right to receive dividends thereon. Notwithstanding the foregoing, dividends shall accrue and only be paid to the extent Shares of a Restricted Stock Award become vested.

(E)Provisions Applicable to Stock Units. The Committee may provide in the terms of a Stock Unit for the elective deferral by the Participant of the receipt of the actual payment of cash or Stock otherwise due and payable to the Participant pursuant to such Award. In providing for such deferral, the Committee shall limit eligibility, and shall specify such rules regarding the timing and other features of the deferral, so as to comply with all applicable sections of ERISA, sections 409A and 457A of the Code, and the constructive receipt and similar doctrines of the internal revenue laws.
(F)Minimum Vesting Periods. Except with respect to five percent (5%) of the maximum number of Shares that may be issued under the Plan, as provided in Section 4(a), each Award shall vest on the basis of the Participant’s continued performance of services or the attainment of performance goals. No Award which vests on the basis of the Participant’s continued performance of services shall vest earlier than one year following the date of grant of such Award and no Award which vests on the basis of attainment of performance goals shall provide for a performance period of less than one year; provided, however, that such limitations shall not preclude the acceleration of vesting of such Award upon the death or Disability of the Participant, or in connection with a Change of Control.

Section 6. Exercises of Stock Options

(A)A Vested Option may be exercised in whole or in part at any time during the term of such Option as provided in the Agreement; provided, however, that (i) an Option may be exercised only while the Optionee is an Eligible Individual, and (ii) each partial exercise shall be for whole Shares only. Unless otherwise provided by Section 5(B)(i), Section 7 or in the Agreement, that portion of an Option that has not become Vested as of the date the Optionee ceases to be an Eligible Individual shall lapse and be null and void.
(B)An Option may be exercised to the extent of any or all full shares of Stock as to which the Option has become exercisable, by giving written or electronic notice of such exercise to the Company or the brokerage firm or firms approved by the Company to facilitate exercises and sales under this Plan, in accordance with the terms of the Option by the person entitled to exercise the Option in accordance with the procedures established by the Committee, its delegate and/or the brokerage firm approved by the Company, as applicable, and delivering full payment for the Shares with respect to which the Option is being exercised to the Company or the brokerage firm or firms, as applicable, along with full payment of all amounts which, under federal, state or other law, the Company is required to withhold upon exercise of the Option or adequate provision therefor.
(C)Except as noted in this paragraph, upon receiving notice of exercise and payment as set forth in Section 6(B) above, the Company will cause the Shares to be delivered to the Optionee (by delivery of a share certificate, electronic transfer or other lawful means), as soon as practicable, and shall evidence such transfer on the books and records of the Company. The Shares issued and delivered upon the exercise of an Option shall be fully paid and non-assessable. Shares shall not be issued pursuant to the exercise of an Option unless the exercise of such Option and the issuance and delivery of such Shares pursuant thereto shall comply with all relevant provisions of law, including, without limitation, the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, the
2022 Proxy – Amended and Restated 2008 Equity Incentive PlanA-11

Table of Contents

Amended and Restated 2008 Equity Incentive Plan

Exchange Act, the rules and regulations promulgated thereunder, and the requirements of any stock exchange upon which the Shares may then be listed, and shall be further subject to the approval of counsel for the Company with respect to such compliance.
(D)The method or methods of payment of the purchase price for the Shares to be purchased upon exercise of an Option and of any amounts required for tax withholding purposes shall be determined by the Company and may consist of (i) cash, (ii) check, (iii) the tendering, by either actual delivery or by attestation, of whole shares of Stock, valued at Fair Market Value as of the day of exercise, (iv) through a special sale and remittance procedure pursuant to which the Optionee shall concurrently provide irrevocable written instructions to (a) a brokerage firm acceptable to the Company to effect the immediate sale of the purchased shares and remit to the Company, out of the sale proceeds available on the settlement date, sufficient funds to cover the aggregate exercise price payable for the purchased shares plus all applicable Federal, state and other employment taxes required to be withheld by the Company by reason of such exercise, and (b) the Company to deliver the certificates for the purchased Shares directly to such brokerage firm in order to complete the sale. The permitted method or methods of payment of the amounts payable upon exercise of an Option may be transacted by the Optionee or by a broker designated by him/her (other than a payment described in clause (iv) above), and, if other than in cash, shall be set forth in the applicable agreement or (v) such other means as may be approved by the Committee from time to time, including without limitation, by the withholding from the number of Shares otherwise issuable upon exercise of the Option that number of shares having an aggregate Fair Market Value on the date of exercise equal to the Exercise Price.

Section 7. Events Affecting Plan Reserve or Plan Awards

(A)If (a) the Company subdivides its outstanding shares of Stock into a greater number of shares of Stock (including, without limitation, by stock dividend or stock split) or combines its outstanding shares of Stock into a smaller number of shares (by reverse stock split, reclassification or otherwise), or (b) any stock dividend, extraordinary cash dividend, reclassification, recapitalization, reorganization, split-up, spin-off, combination, exchange of shares, warrants or rights offering to purchase Stock, or other similar corporate event (including mergers or consolidations) affects the Stock such that the Committee determines that an adjustment is required in order to preserve the benefits or potential benefits intended to be made available under this Plan, then the Committee shall, in such manner as it may deem equitable and appropriate, make such adjustments to any or all of (i) the number of shares of Stock reserved for the Plan, (ii) the number of shares subject to outstanding Options and other Awards, (iii) the Exercise Price with respect to outstanding Options, and any other adjustment that the Committee determines to be equitable; provided, however, that the number of shares subject to any Option shall always be a whole number. The Committee may provide for a cash payment to any Participant of an Award in connection with any adjustment made pursuant to this Section 7.
(B)Any such adjustment to an Option shall comply with Section 409A and any other applicable provisions of the Code and shall be made without a change to the total Exercise Price applicable to the unexercised portion of the Option (except for any change in the aggregate price resulting from rounding-off of share quantities or prices), and shall be final and binding upon all Participants, the Company, their representatives, and all other interested persons.
(C)In the event of a Change in Control:

(i)With respect to each outstanding Award that is assumed or substituted in connection with the Change in Control, in the event the Participant’s employment or service is
A-12
2022 Proxy – Amended and Restated 2008 Equity Incentive Plan

Table of Contents

Amended and Restated 2008 Equity Incentive Plan

terminated by the Company, its successor or an Affiliate thereof without Cause on or after the effective date of the Change in Control but prior to eighteen (18) months following the Change in Control, then:

(1)any unvested or unexercisable portion of any Award carrying a right to exercise shall become fully vested and exercisable; and
(2)the restrictions, deferral limitations, payment conditions and forfeiture conditions applicable to an Award granted under the Plan shall lapse and such Awards shall be deemed fully vested and any performance conditions imposed with respect to such Awards shall be deemed to be achieved at the Committee’s then best estimate of actual performance.

(ii)With respect to each outstanding Award that is not assumed or substituted in connection with a Change in Control, immediately upon the occurrence of the Change of Control:

(1)if such Award is an Option granted one year or more prior to the Change in Control, any unvested or unexercisable portion of such Award shall become fully vested and exercisable and to the extent not exercised as of the Change in Control, shall terminate with respect to all remaining Shares subject to such Option;
(2)if such Award is an Option granted less than one year prior to the Change in Control, such Award shall become fully vested and exercisable as to the number of Shares subject to such Option equal to (i) the number of Shares originally subject to such Option, multiplied by (ii) the number of whole months between the Grant Date and the Change in Control, divided by (iii) the number of months between the Grant Date and the date on which all Shares originally subject to such Option would have been fully vested and exercisable; and such Option shall terminate with respect to all remaining Shares subject to such Option.
(3)if such Award is not an Option, such Award shall become fully vested and all restrictions, deferral limitations, payment conditions and forfeiture conditions applicable to such Award shall lapse immediately prior to the Change in Control and all Stock Unit Awards shall become immediately payable.

(iii)For purposes of this Section 7(C), an Award shall be considered assumed or substituted if, following the Change in Control, the Award is of substantially comparable value and remains subject to substantially the same terms and conditions that were applicable to the Award immediately prior to the Change in Control except that, if the Award related to shares of Stock, the Award instead confers the right to receive cash or common stock of the acquiring or ultimate parent entity.
(iv)Notwithstanding anything in this Section 7(C) to the contrary, with respect to any Award of Restricted Stock Units granted under this Plan that constitutes deferred compensation within the meaning of Section 409A of the Code, if the Change in Control does not constitute a “change in effective ownership or control” of the Company within the meaning of Section 409A of the Code, Restricted Stock Units shall vest as provided in this Section 7(C), but shall be payable to the Participant in accordance with the payment provisions of the applicable Award Agreement.

(D)The Company may determine whether any given leave of absence constitutes a Termination of Service and, if it does not, whether the time spent on the leave will or will not be counted
2022 Proxy – Amended and Restated 2008 Equity Incentive PlanA-13

Table of Contents

Amended and Restated 2008 Equity Incentive Plan

as vesting credit; provided, however, that for purposes of the Plan (i) a leave of absence, duly authorized in writing by the Company, if the period of such leave does not exceed 90 days, and (ii) a leave of absence in excess of 90 days, duly authorized in writing by the Company, provided (a) the Employee’s right to reemployment is guaranteed either by statute or contract, or (b) for the purpose of military service, shall not be deemed a Termination of Service.
(E)Each of the above provisions, to the extent applicable to Options, except to the extent they are applicable solely to (i) the actual purchase of stock and payment of consideration or (ii) Incentive Options, shall also apply to the grant of Stock Appreciation Rights by the Committee under the Plan.

Section 8. Administration

(A)The Plan shall be administered by the Talent and Compensation Committee of the Board unless a different committee is appointed by the Board.
(B)The Committee’s administration of the Plan shall be subject to the following:

(i)Subject to the provisions of the Plan, the Committee will have the authority and discretion to select from among the Eligible Individuals those persons who shall receive Awards, to determine the time or times of receipt, to determine the types of Awards and the number of shares covered by the Awards, to establish the terms, conditions, performance criteria, restrictions, and other provisions of such Awards, and, subject to the restrictions of Section 11, to cancel or suspend Awards.
(ii)To the extent that the Committee determines that the restrictions imposed by the Plan preclude the achievement of the material purposes of the Awards in jurisdictions outside the United States, the Committee will have the authority and discretion to modify those restrictions as the Committee determines to be necessary or appropriate to conform to applicable requirements or practices of those jurisdictions.

(C)The Committee may delegate to one or more Directors or officers of the Company, or a committee of such Directors or officers, the authority, subject to such terms and limitations as the Committee shall determine, to grant Awards to, or to cancel, modify, waive rights with respect to, alter, discontinue, suspend or terminate Awards held by, Employees who are not officers or Directors of the Company for purposes of Section 16 of the Exchange Act provided, however, that any such delegation shall conform with applicable law and the requirements of any exchange on which the Company’s securities are listed.
(D)The Company and its Affiliates shall furnish the Committee with such data and information as it determines may be required for it to discharge its duties. The records of the Company and its Affiliates as to an Employee’s or Participant’s employment (or other provision of services), Termination of Service, leave of absence, reemployment and compensation shall be conclusive on all persons unless determined to be incorrect. Participants and other persons entitled to benefits under the Plan must furnish to the Company such evidence, data, or information, as the Committee or the Company considers desirable to carry out the terms of the Plan.
(E)The Committee is authorized, subject to the provisions of the Plan, to construe and interpret the terms of the Plan and any Award granted hereunder, establish, amend and rescind such rules and regulations, as it deems necessary or advisable for the proper administration of the Plan and to take any such other action in connection with or in relation to the Plan, as it deems necessary or advisable. Each action and determination made or taken pursuant to the Plan by the Committee, including any interpretation or construction of the Plan, shall be final and conclusive for all purposes and upon all persons.
A-14
2022 Proxy – Amended and Restated 2008 Equity Incentive Plan

Table of Contents

Amended and Restated 2008 Equity Incentive Plan

(F)No member of the Committee or the Board shall be personally liable for any action, determination or interpretation made by him/her or the Committee or the Board in good faith with respect to the Plan or any Award granted pursuant thereto.
(G)The Committee, the Company, and its officers and Directors, shall be entitled to rely upon the advice, opinions or valuations of any attorneys, consultants, accountants or other persons employed to assist them in connection with the administration of the Plan.

Section 9. Government Regulations and Registration of Shares

(A)The Plan, and the grant and exercise of Awards hereunder, and the Company’s obligation to sell and deliver stock under Options and Stock Appreciation Rights, shall be subject to all applicable federal and state laws, rules and regulations and to such approvals by any regulatory or governmental agency as may be required.
(B)The obligation of the Company with respect to Awards shall be subject to all applicable laws, rules and regulations and such approvals by any governmental agencies as may be required, including, without limitation, the effectiveness of any registration statement required under the Securities Act of 1933, and the rules and regulations of any securities exchange or association on which the Stock may be listed or quoted.
(C)With respect to persons subject to Section 16 of the Exchange Act, it is the intent of the Company that the Plan and all transactions under the Plan comply with all applicable provisions of Rule 16b-3 or its successors under the Exchange Act. In addition, it is the intent of the Company that Incentive Options comply with the applicable provisions of Section 422 of the Code and that, to the extent applicable, all Awards comply with the requirements of Section 409A of the Code. To the extent that any legal requirement of Section 16 of the Exchange Act or Section 422 or 409A of the Code as set forth in the Plan ceases to be required under such section, the Committee, in its sole discretion, may decide that the applicable Plan provision shall cease to apply. The Committee may revoke any Award if it is contrary to law, or may modify an Award to bring it into compliance with any valid and mandatory government regulation.

Section 10. Miscellaneous Provisions

(A)Rights of Company. Nothing contained in the Plan or in any Agreement, and no action of the Company or the Committee with respect thereto, shall interfere in any way with the right of the Company or an Affiliate to terminate the employment of the Participant at any time, with or without cause. The grant of Awards pursuant to the Plan shall not affect in any way the right or power of the Company to make reclassifications, reorganizations or other changes of or to its capital or business structure or to merge, consolidate, liquidate, sell or otherwise dispose of all or any part of its business or assets.
(B)Designation of Beneficiaries. Each Participant who shall be granted a Plan Award may designate a beneficiary or beneficiaries and may change such designation from time to time by filing a written designation of beneficiary or beneficiaries with the Company on a form to be prescribed by it, provided that no such designation shall be effective unless so filed prior to the death of such person.
(C)Participants Subject to Taxation Outside the United States. The Committee may amend or modify the terms of the Plan or Awards with respect to Participants who reside or work outside the United States in order to conform such terms with the requirements of local law or tax law for a Participant and the Company. An award may be modified under this Section 10(C) in a
2022 Proxy – Amended and Restated 2008 Equity Incentive PlanA-15

Table of Contents

Amended and Restated 2008 Equity Incentive Plan

manner that is inconsistent with the express terms of the Plan, so long as such modifications will not contravene any applicable law or regulation or result in actual liability under Section 16(b) of the Act for the Participant whose award is modified. Additionally, the Committee may adopt such procedures and sub-plans as are necessary or appropriate to permit individuals eligible to participate in the Plan who are non-U.S. nationals or who reside or work outside the United States to participate in the Plan.
(D)Exclusion from Benefit Computation. By accepting an Award, unless otherwise provided in the applicable Agreement, each Participant shall be deemed to have agreed that such Award is special incentive compensation that will not be taken into account, in any manner, as salary, compensation or bonus in determining the amount of any payment under any health and welfare, pension, retirement or other employee benefit plan, program or policy of the Company or any Subsidiary. In addition, each Beneficiary of a deceased Participant shall be deemed to have agreed that such Award will not affect the amount of any life insurance coverage, if any, provided by the Company on the life of the Participant which is payable to such Beneficiary under any life insurance plan covering employees of the Company or any Subsidiary.
(E)Use of Proceeds. Proceeds from the sale of Shares pursuant to Options granted under this Plan shall constitute general funds of the Company.
(F)Form and Time of Elections. Unless otherwise specified herein, each election required or permitted to be made by any Participant or other person entitled to benefits under the Plan, and any permitted modification, or revocation thereof, shall be in writing filed with the Company at such times, in such form, and subject to such restrictions and limitations, not inconsistent with the terms of the Plan, as the Company shall require.
(G)Unfunded Status. Neither a Participant nor any other person shall, by reason or participation in the Plan, acquire any right in or title to any assets, funds or property of the Company or any Affiliate whatsoever, including, without limitation, any specific funds, assets, or other property which the Company or any Affiliate, in its sole discretion may set aside in anticipation of a liability under the Plan. A Participant shall have only a contractual right to the Stock or amounts, if any, payable under the Plan, unsecured by any assets of the Company or any Subsidiary, and nothing contained in the Plan shall constitute a guarantee that the assets of the Company or any Affiliate shall be sufficient to pay any benefits to any person.
(H)Section 409A Compliance. Although the Company does not guarantee the particular tax treatment of an Award granted under this Plan, Awards made under this Plan are intended to comply with, or be exempt from, the applicable requirements of Section 409A of the Code and this Plan and any Award agreement hereunder shall be limited, construed and interpreted in accordance with such intent. To the extent that any Award granted under the Plan constitutes “non-qualified deferred compensation” pursuant to Section 409A of the Code (a “Section 409A Covered Award”), it shall be paid in a manner that is intended to comply with Section 409A of the Code. In no event whatsoever shall the Company be liable for any additional tax, interest or penalties that may be imposed on a participant by Section 409A of the Code or any damages for failing to comply with Section 409A of the Code or this Section 15.6. Notwithstanding anything in the Plan or in an Award to the contrary, the following provisions shall apply to Section 409A Covered Awards:

(i)A termination of employment shall not be deemed to have occurred for purposes of any provision of a Section 409A Covered Award providing for payment upon or following a termination of the Participant’s employment unless such termination is also a “Separation from Service” within the meaning of Code Section 409A and, for purposes of any such provision of Section 409A Covered Award, references to a “termination,” “termination of employment” or like terms shall mean Separation from
A-16
2022 Proxy – Amended and Restated 2008 Equity Incentive Plan

Table of Contents

Amended and Restated 2008 Equity Incentive Plan

Service. Notwithstanding any provision to the contrary in the Plan or the Award, if the participant is deemed on the date of the Participant’s termination to be a “specified employee” within the meaning of that term under Code Section 409A(a)(2)(B) and using the identification methodology selected by the Company from time to time, or if none, the default methodology set forth in Code Section 409A, then with regard to any such payment under a Section 409A Covered Award, to the extent required to be delayed in order to avoid the imposition of taxes under Code Section 409A(a)(2)(B), such payment shall not be made prior to the earlier of (i) the expiration of the six (6)-month period measured from the date of the participant’s Separation from Service, and (ii) the date of the participant’s death. All payments delayed pursuant to this Section 15.6(a) shall be paid to the participant on the first day of the seventh month following the date of the participant’s Separation from Service or, if earlier, on the date of the participant’s death.
(ii)Whenever a payment under a Section 409A Covered Award specifies a payment period with reference to a number of days, the actual date of payment within the specified period shall be within the sole discretion of the Company.
(iii)If under the Section 409A Covered Award an amount is to be paid in two or more installments, for purposes of Code Section 409A, each installment shall be treated as a separate payment.

(I)Recoupment. Dodd-Frank Clawback. The Committee shall have full authority to implement any policies and procedures necessary to comply with Section 10D of the Exchange Act and any rules promulgated thereunder. Without limiting the foregoing, each Agreement evidencing Awards with performance conditions made to Employees who are at the Senior Vice President level or more senior shall include a provision which requires at a minimum that, in the event that:

(i)It is required under regulations adopted under the Dodd Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act;
(ii)the Company’s financial statements covering the applicable performance period (the “Performance Period”) are restated due to material non-compliance with financial reporting requirements within two years of the end of the Performance Period; or
(iii)the Committee determines, in consultation with the Company’s Audit Committee, that there is a high likelihood that an out-of-period adjustment to the Company’s financial statements covering the Performance Period would be deemed to be material because there is alleged misconduct of one or more participants hereunder associated with the adjustment and, absent the adjustment, the benefits payable hereunder to such participant(s) would be materially greater the Committee may require the Award holder to forfeit and/or repay an amount equal to the difference between the amount actually awarded pursuant to such Agreement based on the erroneous financial data and the amount of compensation that should have been awarded to the Award holder pursuant to such Agreement under the accounting restatement or the adjusted financial statements, as applicable, as determined by the Committee in its sole discretion taking into account those factors the Committee determines necessary or appropriate.

(J)Data Privacy. As a condition of receipt of any Award, each Participant explicitly and unambiguously consents to the collection, use, and transfer, in electronic or other form, of personal data as described in this Section by and among, as applicable, the Company and its Affiliates for the exclusive purpose of implementing, administering and managing the Plan and Awards and the Participant’s participation in the Plan (“Plan Administration”). In furtherance of such implementation and administration, the Company and its Affiliates may hold certain
2022 Proxy – Amended and Restated 2008 Equity Incentive PlanA-17

Table of Contents

Amended and Restated 2008 Equity Incentive Plan

personal information about a Participant, including but not limited to, the Participant’s name, home address, telephone number, date of birth, social security or insurance number or other identification number, compensation, nationality, job title, information regarding any securities of the Company or any of its Affiliates, and details of all Awards (the “Data”). In addition to transferring the Data among themselves as necessary for the purpose of Plan Administration, the Company and its Affiliates may each transfer the data to any third parties assisting the Company in Plan Administration. Recipients of the Data may be located in the Participant’s country or elsewhere, and the Participant’s country and any given recipient’s country may have different data privacy laws and protections. By accepting an Award, each Participant authorizes such recipients to receive, possess, use, retain and transfer the Data, in electronic or other form, for the purposes of Plan Administration, including any requisite transfer of such Data as may be required to a broker or other third party with whom the Company or the Participant may elect to deposit any Shares. The Data related to a Participant will be held only as long as is necessary for Plan Administration. A Participant may, at any time, view the Data held by the Company with respect to such Participant, request additional information about the storage and processing of the Data with respect to such Participant, recommend any necessary corrections to the Data with respect to the Participant, or refuse or withdraw the consents herein in writing, in any case without cost, by contacting his or her local human resources representative. The Company may cancel the Participant’s eligibility to participate in the Plan, and in the Company’s discretion, the Participant may forfeit any outstanding Awards in the Participant refuses or withdraws the consents described herein. For more information on the consequences of refusal to consent or withdrawal of consent, Participants may contact their local human resources professional.

Section 11. Term; Amendment and Termination; Stockholder Approval of this Plan

(A)Term. The Plan in this form shall be effective as of the date of the annual shareholders meeting in 2022 (the “Effective Date”) if the Company’s shareholders approve of the Plan. Subject to Section 11(B) hereof, no Awards may be granted under the Plan after April 11, 2032, but Awards granted prior to such date may, and the Committee’s authority to administer the terms of such Awards shall, extend beyond that date.
(B)Amendment and Termination. The Committee may at any time terminate, suspend or discontinue this Plan. The Committee may amend this Plan at any time, provided that no such amendment shall be made without the approval of the Company’s stockholders (a) to the extent that such approval is required by applicable law or by the listing standards of any applicable exchange(s) on or after the adoption of this Plan, (b) to the extent that such amendment would materially increase the number of securities which may be issued under the Plan, (c) to the extent that such amendment would materially modify the requirements for participation in the Plan or (d) to the extent that such amendment would permit or would result in the purchase of any or all outstanding Options with an Exercise Price greater than the Fair Market Value of a Share of Stock or repricing of any Options under the Plan.
The Committee may at any time alter or amend any or all Award Agreements under this Plan to include provisions, or to effect a result, that would be authorized for a new Award under this Plan, so long as such an amendment would not require approval of the Company’s shareholders if such amendment were made to the Plan. Notwithstanding the foregoing, except as may be provided in Section 7(C), no such action by the Board or the Committee shall, in any manner adverse to a Participant, affect any Award then outstanding without the consent in writing of the affected Participant.
A-18
2022 Proxy – Amended and Restated 2008 Equity Incentive Plan

Table of Contents



 

Miami, Florida
royalcaribbean.com
1050 Caribbean Way
Miami, FL 33132

 



ROYAL CARIBBEAN CRUISES LTD.

1050 CARIBBEAN WAY

MIAMI, FL 33132-2096

ATTN: INVESTOR RELATIONS

SCAN TO
VIEW MATERIALS & VOTE

Vote 24 Hours a Day, 7 Days a Week by Internet, Telephone or Mail.

VOTE BY INTERNET - www.proxyvote.comor scan the QR Barcode above

Use the Internet to transmit your voting instructions and for electronic delivery of information up until 11:59 p.m. Eastern Time the day before the cut-off date or meeting date. Have your proxy card in hand when you access the web site and follow the instructions to obtain your records and to create an electronic voting instruction form.

ELECTRONIC DELIVERY OF FUTURE PROXY MATERIALS

If you would like to reduce the costs incurred by our company in mailing proxy materials, you can consent to receiving all future proxy statements, proxy cards and annual reports electronically via e-mail or the Internet. To sign up for electronic delivery, please follow the instructions above to vote using the Internet and, when prompted, indicate that you agree to receive or access proxy materials electronically in future years.

VOTE BY PHONE - 1-800-690-6903

Use any touch-tone telephone to transmit your voting instructions up until 11:59 p.m. Eastern Time the day before the cut-off date or meeting date. Have your proxy card in hand when you call and then follow the instructions.

VOTE BY MAIL

Mark, sign and date your proxy card and return it in the postage-paid envelope we have provided or return it to Vote Processing, c/o Broadridge, 51 Mercedes Way, Edgewood, NY 11717.







TO VOTE, MARK BLOCKS BELOW IN BLUE OR BLACK INK AS FOLLOWS:
D83327-P71659TO VOTE, MARK BLOCKS BELOW IN BLUE OR BLACK INK AS FOLLOWS:
V11780-P90832                    KEEP THIS PORTION FOR YOUR RECORDS
THIS PROXY CARD IS VALID ONLY WHEN SIGNED AND DATED.DETACH AND RETURN THIS PORTION ONLY
THIS PROXY CARD IS VALID ONLY WHEN SIGNED AND DATED.
ROYAL CARIBBEAN CRUISES LTD.

ROYAL CARIBBEAN CRUISES LTD.

The Board of Directors recommends you vote FORthe election of all the listed nominees, and FOR Proposals 2 3 and 4.4, and 1 YEAR for Proposal 3.

1.
1.Election of DirectorsForAgainstAbstain
1a.John F. Brock
1b.Richard D. Fain
1c.Stephen R. Howe, Jr.
1d.William L. Kimsey
1e.Michael O. Leavitt
1f.Jason T. Liberty
1g.Amy McPherson
1h.Maritza G. Montiel
1i.Ann S. Moore
1j.Eyal M. Ofer
1k.William K. Reilly
1l.Vagn O. Sørensen


ForAgainstAbstain
1m.Donald Thompson
1n.Arne Alexander Wilhelmsen
      
1a.John F. Brock
   
2.1b.Richard D. Fain
1c.Stephen R. Howe, Jr.
1d.William L. Kimsey
1e.Michael O. Leavitt
1f.Jason T. Liberty
1g.Amy McPherson
1h.Maritza G. Montiel
1i.Ann S. Moore
1j.Eyal M. Ofer
1k.Vagn O. Sørensen
1l.Donald Thompson

            
 




ForAgainstAbstain
1m.Arne Alexander Wilhelmsen
1n.Rebecca Yeung
2.Advisory approval of the Company's compensation of its named executive officers.
3.
1 Year2 Years3 YearsAbstain
3.Advisory vote on the frequency of shareholder vote on executive compensation.
ForAgainstAbstain
4.Ratification of the appointment of PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP as the Company's independent registered public accounting firm for 2022.2023.
4.Approval of Amended and Restated 2008 Equity Incentive Plan.

NOTE: THE SHARES COVERED BY A PROPERLY EXECUTED PROXY WILL BE VOTED AS SPECIFIED THEREIN. IF NO SPECIFIC DIRECTIONS ARE MADE, THE SHARES WILL BE VOTED "FOR" THE ELECTION OF ALL LISTED NOMINEES, AND "FOR" PROPOSALS 2 3 AND 4.

4, AND FOR "1 YEAR" ON PROPOSAL 3.

Please sign exactly as your name(s) appear(s) hereon. When signing as attorney, executor, administrator, or other fiduciary, please give full title as such. Joint owners should each sign personally. All holders must sign. If a corporation or partnership, please sign in full corporate or partnership name by authorized officer.

                                                                

Signature [PLEASE SIGN WITHIN BOX]

Date

                                                                

Signature (Joint Owners)

Date











Table of Contents











Important Notice Regarding Internet Availability of Proxy Materials for the Annual Meeting:


The Notice of Annual Meeting and Proxy Statement and Annual Report are available at www.proxyvote.com.


















D83328-P71659

V11781-P90832

ROYAL CARIBBEAN CRUISES LTD.

PROXY SOLICITED BY THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS FOR THE

ANNUAL MEETING OF SHAREHOLDERS TO BE HELD JUNE 2, 2022
1, 2023

The undersigned hereby appoints Jason T. Liberty and Naftali Holtz, and each of them, as the undersigned's attorneys and agents to vote as Proxy for the undersigned, as herein stated, at the Annual Meeting of Shareholders of Royal Caribbean Cruises Ltd. to be held at the JW Marriott Marquis Miami, 255 Biscayne Boulevard Way, Miami, Florida 33131 on Thursday, June 2, 20221, 2023 at 9:00 A.M., Eastern Time, and at any adjournment or postponement thereof, according to the number of votes the undersigned would be entitled to vote if personally present, on the Proposals set forth on the reverse side and in accordance with their discretion on any other matters that may properly come before the meeting or any adjournments or postponements thereof. The undersigned hereby acknowledges receipt of the Notice of Annual Meeting and Proxy Statement dated April 19, 202218, 2023 and Annual Report for 2021.2022.






Continued and to be signed on reverse side